Virtual Savings – Yea or Nay?

Be the first to comment | I like it!
February 4, 2009, 08:16 PM —  Miro Consulting — 

Virtualization has become one of the biggest trends in IT in the last eighteen months, with Gartner predicting it to be the single most important technology for IT Departments by 2010. As more and more organizations hop on the Virtualization bandwagon, the question that should be asked: Does virtualization really lead to significant cost savings? Most IT and finance managers will say yes, but there seems to be a big misunderstanding as to what a virtualized environment means in terms of costs savings – particularly when it comes to software licensing. Because usage on virtual environments is difficult to measure and the premise encourages multiple usages of one license – in the long run – it could actually end up costing more for licenses year over year.

In the new, more consolidated data center – vendors are fighting to protect revenues and have yet to figure out a way to accurately license virtual environments. And, each software vendor treats virtualization and licensing very differently. Microsoft, for example, has faced scrutiny over its licensing schemes and has succumbed to pressure, changing its 90-day rule for re-assigning server applications. On the other hand, VMWare is considered soft partitioning and under Oracle's standard licensing policy, “soft partitions are not an acceptable means to limit licensing requirements.” There are a variety of partitioning scenarios even within this policy, but each has its own challenges and each situation should be viewed separately for licensing compliance.

Consider the traditional methods of software licensing – you buy one license and are given the right to install that license on one computer or server. When one physical computer is divided into multiple virtual computers and can be moved around or destroyed with the click of a button, what happens to the applications running in that environment? Should every instance of the use of that license be charged as a separate license? If so, we are talking exponential fees, particularly for large organizations that could potentially deploy hundreds of virtual computers and/or severs.

Should customers pay for each separate virtual computer and its subsequent application usage? The answer is no, usage may appear to go up, when in fact it doesn't – it has only changed. We must also remember that virtualization hardware itself comes with a hefty price tag. Of course, the issue is to make a distinction between hard and soft partitioning and aligning the environment with licensing compliance rules.

Licensing in a virtualized environment adds to the already complex world of enterprise software licensing. So, let's look at the cost savings that we know.

Hardware

Turning five physical servers into four virtual and one physical will obviously cut down on hardware costs. The caveat – the machines required to run your new virtual environments are much more expensive.

Sign up for ITworld's Daily newsletter
Follow ITworld on Twitter @IT_world

I like it!
Close

On Twitter now

virtualization

Powered by Twitter
You are logged in | Sign out
Sign in and post to Twitter

What are you thinking?

Cancel Tweet sent

On Twitter now

Post a comment
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
peer-to-peer

Esther Schindler
If the comments are ugly, the code is ugly

claird
SVG a graphics format for 21st century

pasmith
Take Chrome OS for a test spin

Sandra Henry-Stocker
Solaris Tip: Have Your Files Changed Since Installation?

sjvn
64-bits of protection?

jfruh
Android fragments vs. the iPhone monolith

mikelgan
What Gizmodo missed about the Pro WX Wireless USB disk drive

 

Where Google Chrome security fails: the password
I heard mention that the Chrome OS will have some sort of encryption available a la bitlocker. If it's possible to encrypt personal data using another password or key, then it may have potential for very secure data.... And Ubuntu has an 'encrypt home directory' option, perhaps google should follow suit.
- Dann

Join the conversation here

The Daily Tip

The Daily TipQuick, practical advice for IT pros. Made fresh daily.

Hot tips:

Want to cash in on your IT savvy? Send your tip to tips@itworld.com. If we post it, we'll send you a $25 Amazon e-gift card.

Newsletters

Subscribe to ITWORLD TODAY and receive the latest IT news and analysis.

I would like to receive offers via email from ITworld partners.
By clicking submit you agree to the terms and conditions outlined in ITworld's privacy policy.
Featured Sponsor

AISO founders envisioned a Web hosting company that was environmentally friendly. While the company employed energy-efficient innovations like solar panels, its infrastructure produced unacceptable power and cooling requirements. Find out how AISO leveraged AMD technology to overcome their challenge in this case study white paper.

In this whitepaper, Scalar explores the opportunity to change the landscape with respect to mission critical databases built around Oracle. Leveraging technologies such as Linux, high-end commodity processing power and Oracle RAC technology to architect, design, build and maintain database infrastructure that delivers maximum availability, reliability and performance at a fraction of traditional cost.

On a typical day, weather.com, the Web site for The Weather Channel in Atlanta, serves up between 15 million and 20 million page views. But in September 2004, when back-to-back hurricanes ransacked Florida, the peak traffic on one day more than tripled: over 70 million page views by more than 7 million unique visitors. Read the full success story now.

Marketplace