Gone to the dogs: Cautionary tales of IT pet projects
"Pet projects": If you're a typical tech toiler, those two words no doubt made your hair stand up on end. How often have you been assigned to labor on a project that you suspect reflects your immediate supervisor's interests or office-politics goals, but does little or nothing for the health and profits of your organization as a whole? We asked some readers to share their own horror stories in this department -- to serve as gruesome entertainment and provide cautionary examples. Note that the names and details in some of these stories have been tweaked a bit to protect the innocent -- and the guilty.
Buzzword compliance, please
A little knowledge can be a dangerous thing -- especially a little knowledge about the latest trends in IT, or just "computers" in general, because then those trends start becoming priorities for front-line workers. A civilian employee on a U.S. military base, who wants to remain anonymous, is in just such a spot. "My boss wants to do Twitter, Facebook, Flickr, YouTube -- 'all that social media stuff' -- and a blog, video, RSS, Sharepoint, 'or some other CMS' -- basically, any of the buzzwords in new communication you can think of. His resources? Me, and a budget of a few thousand dollars."
Photo by skullY Dazed
While you may be sniffing at that list -- "Pssht, everyone wants a buzzword-compliant Web 2.0 site these days" -- you probably aren't facing the same set of troubles that our anonymous correspondent is. Military networks are a quite a different animal than whatever's been cobbled together at your local startup. "What I'm up against is a completely locked-down computer network that prevents access to those sites, and a bureaucratic IT department that doesn't know how to implement VPN or WebDAV for remote access to a Web server, for example," my correspondent writes. You'd think that his manager would see the mismatch, but, as he puts it, "It's been my experience that supervisors in technical fields are promoted to get them out of the way of those who can actually implement, maintain and fix things."
Good intentions gone wrong
Sometimes even initiatives that that start off with valid business purposes can go awry, especially when the requirements haven't been worked out in enough detail and good money is thrown after bad.
An IT architect at a major midwestern university was directed by his boss to help set up a virtual dashboard that would indicate the status of the school network. When users had a problem, they'd be able to see for themselves what isn't working, or why the Internet is slow. "This will make them feel empowered and lend a sense of inclusiveness and transparency to what we do!" his boss explained. Sounds good, right?
Sign up for ITworld's Daily newsletter
Follow ITworld on Twitter @IT_world
On Twitter now
project management
Powered by Twitter
jfruh
Apple syncing patent can't come soon enough
pasmith
New Twitter features borrow from 3rd party clients
Esther Schindler
Open Source Changes the Software Acquisition Process
mikelgan
How to set up continuous podcast play on the new iTunes
David Strom
Five important Windows 7 mobility features
sjvn
Guard your Wi-Fi for your own sake
Sandra Henry-Stocker
Grepping on Whole Words
Sidekick: The Good News & the Bad News
Either way you look at it Microsoft Data Center management did not follow standards or best practices in this failure. In which case it makes me wonder more about the outsourcing of corporate data much less personal data.
- mburton325
Join the conversation here
Quick, practical advice for IT pros. Made fresh daily.
Want to cash in on your IT savvy? Send your tip to tips@itworld.com. If we post it, we'll send you a $25 Amazon e-gift card.













True, That
"...management often won't listen to input on such matters from their own employees unless an expensive consultant suggests it."You don't have to be in IT to know this is so very true.
Hmmm. Decent article for the
Hmmm. Decent article for the most part...but looked at from another direction, kind of whiny in spots. I'm amused at the part suggesting the management keeps themselves informed of the progress and status of projects--but isn't that just what the people under them *complain* about, being badgered to report on that, to the detriment of their ability to actually get work done on it?And the last bit with the dogs...yes, making the employees care for the animals is a bit excessive, yes--but the part about the doghouse is pure stupidity. Even in the author's own words, the doghouse was *commissioned* from the previous employee--ie, they were paid separate from their normal wages for making it--as opposed to just having the project dumped on them. For all we know, said predecessor was an hobbyist carpenter and was *happy* to make the project.