Gone to the dogs: Cautionary tales of IT pet projects

2 comments | 41I like it!
June 2, 2009, 07:00 AM —  ITworld — 

"Pet projects": If you're a typical tech toiler, those two words no doubt made your hair stand up on end.  How often have you been assigned to labor on a project that you suspect reflects your immediate supervisor's interests or office-politics goals, but does little or nothing for the health and profits of your organization as a whole?  We asked some readers to share their own horror stories in this department -- to serve as gruesome entertainment and provide cautionary examples. Note that the names and details in some of these stories have been tweaked a bit to protect the innocent -- and the guilty.

Buzzword compliance, please

A little knowledge can be a dangerous thing -- especially a little knowledge about the latest trends in IT, or just "computers" in general, because then those trends start becoming priorities for front-line workers. A civilian employee on a U.S. military base, who wants to remain anonymous, is in just such a spot. "My boss wants to do Twitter, Facebook, Flickr, YouTube -- 'all that social media stuff' -- and a blog, video, RSS, Sharepoint, 'or some other CMS' -- basically, any of the buzzwords in new communication you can think of. His resources? Me, and a budget of a few thousand dollars."

buzzwords

Is your project fully buzzworded?
Photo by skullY Dazed

While you may be sniffing at that list -- "Pssht, everyone wants a buzzword-compliant Web 2.0 site these days" -- you probably aren't facing the same set of troubles that our anonymous correspondent is. Military networks are a quite a different animal than whatever's been cobbled together at your local startup. "What I'm up against is a completely locked-down computer network that prevents access to those sites, and a bureaucratic IT department that doesn't know how to implement VPN or WebDAV for remote access to a Web server, for example," my correspondent writes.  You'd think that his manager would see the mismatch, but, as he puts it, "It's been my experience that supervisors in technical fields are promoted to get them out of the way of those who can actually implement, maintain and fix things."

Good intentions gone wrong

Sometimes even initiatives that that start off with valid business purposes can go awry, especially when the  requirements haven't been worked out in enough detail and good money is thrown after bad.

An IT architect at a major midwestern university was directed by his boss to help set up a virtual dashboard that would indicate the status of the school network.  When users had a problem, they'd be able to see for themselves what isn't working, or why the Internet is slow. "This will make them feel empowered and lend a sense of inclusiveness and transparency to what we do!" his boss explained.  Sounds good, right?

Sign up for ITworld's Daily newsletter
Follow ITworld on Twitter @IT_world

I like it!
Close

On Twitter now

project management

Powered by Twitter
You are logged in | Sign out
Sign in and post to Twitter

What are you thinking?

Cancel Tweet sent

On Twitter now

Comments

True, That

"...management often won't listen to input on such matters from their own employees unless an expensive consultant suggests it."

You don't have to be in IT to know this is so very true.
| reply

Hmmm. Decent article for the

Hmmm. Decent article for the most part...but looked at from another direction, kind of whiny in spots. I'm amused at the part suggesting the management keeps themselves informed of the progress and status of projects--but isn't that just what the people under them *complain* about, being badgered to report on that, to the detriment of their ability to actually get work done on it?

And the last bit with the dogs...yes, making the employees care for the animals is a bit excessive, yes--but the part about the doghouse is pure stupidity. Even in the author's own words, the doghouse was *commissioned* from the previous employee--ie, they were paid separate from their normal wages for making it--as opposed to just having the project dumped on them. For all we know, said predecessor was an hobbyist carpenter and was *happy* to make the project.
| reply
peer-to-peer

Brian Proffitt
Microsoft/Novell: Breaking Down the Coupon Numbers

Esther Schindler
Drupal's Dries Buytaert on Building the Next Drupal

Tom Henderson
Top Ten General Operating Systems Rants

pasmith
PS3 motion controller delayed; goes up against Project Natal

sjvn
Neolithic Windows security hole alive and well in Windows 7

claird
Perl source code comparison makes for good reading

mikelgan
Cell phones don't create stress or interrupt much

Sandra Henry-Stocker
How to: The Unix Interview

 

Where Google Chrome security fails: the password
I heard mention that the Chrome OS will have some sort of encryption available a la bitlocker. If it's possible to encrypt personal data using another password or key, then it may have potential for very secure data.... And Ubuntu has an 'encrypt home directory' option, perhaps google should follow suit.
- Dann

Join the conversation here

The Daily Tip

The Daily TipQuick, practical advice for IT pros. Made fresh daily.

Hot tips:

Want to cash in on your IT savvy? Send your tip to tips@itworld.com. If we post it, we'll send you a $25 Amazon e-gift card.

Newsletters

Subscribe to ITWORLD TODAY and receive the latest IT news and analysis.

I would like to receive offers via email from ITworld partners.
By clicking submit you agree to the terms and conditions outlined in ITworld's privacy policy.
Marketplace