iOS developers receive legal threats over in-app purchasing

By Lex Friedman, Macworld |  Legal, iOS development, legal

Early Friday morning, developer James Thomson of TLA Systems—the company behind iOS app PCalc—posted a series of updates on Twitter regarding a legal threat he had just received. As Thomson explained to Macworld via e-mail:

I received a letter this morning via FedEx which alleges that PCalc Lite's use of an in-app purchasing mechanism infringes on a patent held by this company, and I have 21 days to get back to them.

Thomson's not the only developer to have received such a threat. Developer Patrick McCarron of MobileAge confirmed via Twitter (and in a later e-mail to Macworld) that he'd received a similar package via FedEx; his notice arrived Thursday evening. McCarron told Macworld that the four patents the company referenced in his letter deal with online help, subscription renewals, in-app purchasing, and interactive online advertisements.

Both developers say that they have reached out to Apple for legal advice. Both also say that they are waiting to hear back from Apple before publicly naming the company behind the threat.

Whether Apple will write back is an open question. Section 6.2 of the iOS Paid Apps Agreement signed by every developer reads as follows:

You shall be solely responsible for, and Apple shall have no responsibility or liability whatsoever with respect to, any and all claims, suits, liabilities, losses, damages, costs and expenses arising from, or attributable to, the Licensed Applications and/or the use of those Licensed Applications by any end-user, including, but not limited to: (i) claims of breach of warranty, whether specified in the EULA or established under applicable law; (ii) product liability claims; and (iii) claims that any of the Licensed Applications and/or the end-user's possession or use of those Licensed Applications infringes the copyright or other intellectual property rights of any third party. (emphasis added)

Of course, if the company responsible for the legal notices is truly alleging that implementing Apple's own in-app purchasing API violates the company's patents, Apple may well want to get involved. Apple did not respond immediately to Macworld's request for comment.


Originally published on Macworld |  Click here to read the original story.
Join us:
Facebook

Twitter

Pinterest

Tumblr

LinkedIn

Google+

Answers - Powered by ITworld

ITworld Answers helps you solve problems and share expertise. Ask a question or take a crack at answering the new questions below.

Ask a Question
randomness