Linux security basics

March 23, 2001, 01:51 PM —  LinuxWorld.com — 

There seem to be two kinds of people in the world: those who think computer security is fun and exciting, and those who think it is arcane and scary. Professional system administrators who read their logs will tell you computer security is actually long periods of boredom punctuated by intervals of sleeplessness, panic, and frantic activity.



For months, you read logs that basically consist of the same sequence of messages. Then one morning, you see a different message. Your first thought tends to be "I've been hit!" You want to determine whether the attack was successful. You comb through logs and examine files on your systems, looking for signs of abnormal behavior. There are none; maybe the attack has failed. But perhaps the attacker was smarter than you. For days or weeks you remain unsure if your system's defenses were penetrated. Eventually, you forget about it and move on to a new crisis.



I think driving is an excellent metaphor for computer security, on a number of levels: Some people think driving is enjoyable and exciting, but some think it is dangerous and scary. I insure my vehicle, follow the rules of the road, wear my seatbelt, stay out of harm's way, keep my eyes on the road, and perform regular maintenance. Let's take a look at how each of those steps applies to computer security.

I like it!
Post a comment
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
peer-to-peer

Brian Proffitt
Microsoft/Novell: Breaking Down the Coupon Numbers

Esther Schindler
Drupal's Dries Buytaert on Building the Next Drupal

Tom Henderson
Top Ten General Operating Systems Rants

pasmith
PS3 motion controller delayed; goes up against Project Natal

sjvn
Neolithic Windows security hole alive and well in Windows 7

claird
Perl source code comparison makes for good reading

mikelgan
Cell phones don't create stress or interrupt much

Sandra Henry-Stocker
How to: The Unix Interview

 

Where Google Chrome security fails: the password
I heard mention that the Chrome OS will have some sort of encryption available a la bitlocker. If it's possible to encrypt personal data using another password or key, then it may have potential for very secure data.... And Ubuntu has an 'encrypt home directory' option, perhaps google should follow suit.
- Dann

Join the conversation here

The Daily Tip

The Daily TipQuick, practical advice for IT pros. Made fresh daily.

Hot tips:

Want to cash in on your IT savvy? Send your tip to tips@itworld.com. If we post it, we'll send you a $25 Amazon e-gift card.

Newsletters

Subscribe to ITWORLD TODAY and receive the latest IT news and analysis.

I would like to receive offers via email from ITworld partners.
By clicking submit you agree to the terms and conditions outlined in ITworld's privacy policy.
Marketplace