Win4Lin vs. VMware

Be the first to comment | 1I like it!
March 19, 2001, 02:02 PM —  LinuxWorld.com — 


Shortly after I wrote about Win4Lin a few weeks ago, I was bombarded with questions from readers asking how it compares to VMware. Win4Lin is a product that allows you to install and run Windows 95 or Windows 98 under Linux. With VMware, you can also install and run various other versions of Windows under Linux. (See Resources for links to both.)



They may sound similar, but I don't believe a comparison between the two is appropriate, at least not as the products stand. Currently, Win4Lin has one specific purpose: it provides a fast, stable Windows environment under Linux so that you can run Windows productivity applications without having to sacrifice Linux as your default environment. In contrast, VMware is a general-purpose virtual machine that, among other things, runs Windows productivity applications under Linux.


In other words, VMware goes way beyond the capabilities of Win4Lin. In addition to Windows 95 or Windows 98, you can run Windows 2000 in a virtual machine under the Linux host operating system. VMware is also available for Windows; with that version, you can run Linux in a virtual machine under Windows. You can also run other operating systems, such as FreeBSD, in the virtual machine. And you can run multiple virtual machines simultaneously.

How we tested


Hardware


Processor: Athlon 1 GHz

Memory: 256 MB PC133 RAM

Mass storage: Two Maxtor ATA 66 IDE drives (one 20 GB drive and one 40 GB drive)


Platform


Operating System: Storm 2000 (Debian 2.2)

Kernel: 2.2.17 (custom)

Configuration: Debian system has been upgraded to latest Woody unstable release. All partitions have been formatted as Reiserfs.


Testing Methods


Software: VMware 2.0.3, Win4Lin 2.0, Windows 98 SE,
Microsoft Office 2000 Premium, Netscape Communicator 4.76,
Internet Explorer 5.5, Microsoft Media Player


Clearly, many of my readers are enamored with VMware due to the gee-whiz factor of being able to run one or more operating systems in isolated virtual machines on top of the host operating system. I confess it's a pretty cool experience to boot up VMware in a Linux window and then jump into the virtual BIOS setup screen or watch it count up the virtual RAM. But once I get beyond the coolness factor, I don't see any compelling reason to use VMware in preference to Win4Lin, at least for the reasons most Linux business users would use Win4Lin.

Reluctant comparison

In the first place, Win4Lin is clearly much faster than VMware. Granted, Windows under VMware is perfectly usable on my system, but Windows under Win4Lin not only runs faster than Windows under VMware, it seems to actually run faster than Windows alone.


My readers tell me there's a good reason for that: it's the filesystem. The default ext2 (second extended) filesystem for Linux is supposedly faster than the FAT16 or FAT32 filesystems that Windows 98 uses. I'm using Reiserfs, which performs even better

I like it!
Post a comment
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Free stuff

Win an Amazon Kindle!
This month's giveaway gadget - Amazon's Kindle - will keep you entertained on the long trip home to visit family and friends over the holidays. Enter the drawing now!

Applied Security Visualization
By Raffael Marty
Published by Addison-Wesley Professional
Learn more!

 

IT Manager's Handbook
By Bill Holtsnider and Brian D. Jaffe
Published by Morgan Kaufmann
Learn more!

 

Windows Vista Resource Kit
By Mitch Tulloch, Tony Northrup, and Jerry Honeycutt
Published by Microsoft Press
Learn more!

Featured Sponsor

AISO founders envisioned a Web hosting company that was environmentally friendly. While the company employed energy-efficient innovations like solar panels, its infrastructure produced unacceptable power and cooling requirements. Find out how AISO leveraged AMD technology to overcome their challenge in this case study white paper.

In this whitepaper, Scalar explores the opportunity to change the landscape with respect to mission critical databases built around Oracle. Leveraging technologies such as Linux, high-end commodity processing power and Oracle RAC technology to architect, design, build and maintain database infrastructure that delivers maximum availability, reliability and performance at a fraction of traditional cost.

On a typical day, weather.com, the Web site for The Weather Channel in Atlanta, serves up between 15 million and 20 million page views. But in September 2004, when back-to-back hurricanes ransacked Florida, the peak traffic on one day more than tripled: over 70 million page views by more than 7 million unique visitors. Read the full success story now.

More Resources