Where Microsoft lost its way - Google obsession

3 comments | I like it!
March 4, 2008, 12:05 PM —  ITworld.com — 

Microsoft has always been a software company and Google has always been an online services firm. Historically speaking, Google has never sold an operating system (or anything else for that matter) and Bill Gates and company have yet to embrace any online service that won't allow it to turn a profit.

Knowing that, why are Microsoft and Google such fierce competitors? Surely, the latter would have been content controlling the online space without competing against the former, but why did Microsoft decide to pick a fight with one of the most powerful online firms in the world?

Believe it or not, the answer is actually quite simple - jealousy.

And it's that jealousy that has not only forced Microsoft into a corner, it has led the company to believe it can be a bloated mess and offer a wide array of products without focusing on its core competency - software.

Microsoft's Google obsession started when Sergey Brin and Larry Page did something no other company could do - grow in the face of Bill Gates to a level that not even his company's $2 billion profit per quarter could stand up to. After all, if Microsoft held on to anything over the past decade, it certainly latched on to the belief that because it was the most powerful company in the technology industry, it could do practically anything it wanted. But all that has changed.

Because of Google's meteoric rise and its staggering profitability, it has become one of the most powerful companies in the world and one of the few that can stand up to Microsoft. To make matters worse, it's the good guy to most people and its services don't aim to gouge your wallet even though they work extremely well. Instead, Google has embraced a new philosophy -- "Don't be evil" -- and so far, it has done a pretty good job of sticking to it. For the first time in recent memory, Microsoft is the company without the advantage and realizing this, it has lost its focus on software and ensuring Office and Windows are up-to-par. Instead, the company's focus has moved towards the online space and it's doing all it can to supplant Google as the de facto leader.

In just the past year, Microsoft acquired aQuantive, a relatively unknown advertising company after Google acquired Doubleclick; it bought into Facebook and acquired advertising rights after Google went after MySpace's advertising and has tried to downplay the significance of Google.

Sign up for ITworld's Daily newsletter
Follow ITworld on Twitter @IT_world

I like it!
Close

On Twitter now

microsoft

Powered by Twitter
You are logged in | Sign out
Sign in and post to Twitter

What are you thinking?

Cancel Tweet sent

On Twitter now

Comments

I think that Microsoft is

I think that Microsoft is still the most powerful company in the world and by the way you should check out this website, it could help to understand which company is the most powerful:

http://wwww.themostpowerfulcompany.com
| reply

I think that Microsoft stays

I think that Microsoft stays the most powerful company on the planet...and you should check out this website to make your own opinion, it's pretty cool

http://www.themostpowerfulcompany.com.html
| reply

I think you don't decide who

I think you don't decide who is the most powerful company on earth like that. First, there has to be a connection with the time: today is 2008. 10 years ago, it was Microsoft, today maybe Google.
Second, it can be sometimes difficult to have values to refer to judge whichi company is the most powerful.
My guess is : let the highest bidder win !

Alex

http://www.themostpowerfulcompany.com


| reply
peer-to-peer

Esther Schindler
If the comments are ugly, the code is ugly

claird
SVG a graphics format for 21st century

pasmith
Take Chrome OS for a test spin

Sandra Henry-Stocker
Solaris Tip: Have Your Files Changed Since Installation?

sjvn
64-bits of protection?

jfruh
Android fragments vs. the iPhone monolith

mikelgan
What Gizmodo missed about the Pro WX Wireless USB disk drive

 

Sidekick: The Good News & the Bad News
Either way you look at it Microsoft Data Center management did not follow standards or best practices in this failure. In which case it makes me wonder more about the outsourcing of corporate data much less personal data.
- mburton325

Join the conversation here

The Daily Tip

The Daily TipQuick, practical advice for IT pros. Made fresh daily.

Hot tips:

Want to cash in on your IT savvy? Send your tip to tips@itworld.com. If we post it, we'll send you a $25 Amazon e-gift card.

Newsletters

Subscribe to ITWORLD TODAY and receive the latest IT news and analysis.

I would like to receive offers via email from ITworld partners.
By clicking submit you agree to the terms and conditions outlined in ITworld's privacy policy.
Featured Sponsor

AISO founders envisioned a Web hosting company that was environmentally friendly. While the company employed energy-efficient innovations like solar panels, its infrastructure produced unacceptable power and cooling requirements. Find out how AISO leveraged AMD technology to overcome their challenge in this case study white paper.

In this whitepaper, Scalar explores the opportunity to change the landscape with respect to mission critical databases built around Oracle. Leveraging technologies such as Linux, high-end commodity processing power and Oracle RAC technology to architect, design, build and maintain database infrastructure that delivers maximum availability, reliability and performance at a fraction of traditional cost.

On a typical day, weather.com, the Web site for The Weather Channel in Atlanta, serves up between 15 million and 20 million page views. But in September 2004, when back-to-back hurricanes ransacked Florida, the peak traffic on one day more than tripled: over 70 million page views by more than 7 million unique visitors. Read the full success story now.

Marketplace