Microsoft/Yahoo deadline passes with no deal

By Juan Carlos Perez, IDG News Service |  Business Add a new comment

Yahoo failed to agree to an acquisition deal with Microsoft by Saturday, the
deadline Microsoft had set for wrapping up negotiations.

Now Microsoft must decide whether to pursue a hostile takeover via a proxy
fight or to drop the bid and seek other acquisition alternatives.

All along, Microsoft's management had indicated strongly that they would pursue
Yahoo via all available options, including the hostile route of ousting the
current board by proposing its own slate of director candidates at the next
Yahoo shareholders' meeting.

But Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer and CFO Chris Liddell softened that stance
in public comments last week, saying that giving
up on the acquisition would also be an option
.

On Sunday, Yahoo declined to comment. Microsoft responded by pointing to comments
Liddell made on Thursday during Microsoft's earnings announcement.

"Unless we make progress with Yahoo towards an agreement by this weekend,
we will reconsider our alternatives. We will provide updates as appropriate
next week, these alternatives clearly including taking an offer to the Yahoo
shareholders, or to withdraw our proposal and focus on other opportunities,
both organic and inorganic," Liddell said then.

Citing anonymous sources, The Wall Street Journal reported Sunday that Microsoft,
Yahoo and their advisers have held talks in recent weeks but didn't achieve
enough progress to hammer out a deal by Saturday.

The process has clearly been frustrating for Microsoft's management, who have
maintained that their offer is fair and that they don't see a reason to revise
it. Ballmer and his team have shown signs of getting impatient with the slow
progress, not surprising considering Microsoft's urgency at boosting its underperforming
Internet business and competing better against Google.

Launching a proxy fight would prolong even further the acquisition process
and make the fight even nastier. Even if Microsoft were to win, it would not
be a good start to what would be an arduous and lengthy post-acquisition integration
process.

In the meantime, Google would no doubt seek to capitalize on the internal turmoil
within Microsoft and Yahoo by trying to poach clients and valuable employees.

As soon as Microsoft announced
its bid for Yahoo
on Feb. 1 -- valued at US$44.6 billion at the time --
Yahoo's management began seeking and considering alternatives, while its stock
began to rise from the latest pre-bid price of $19.18.

By the time Yahoo's board formally rejected the unsolicited offer on Feb. 11,
saying it undervalued the company, Yahoo's stock price had risen to $29.87,
erasing the offer's premium. The next day, Microsoft hinted in a letter to Yahoo
that it wouldn't shy away from attempting a hostile takeover.

Since the bid's announcement, Yahoo CEO and co-founder Jerry Yang has held
conversations with various companies including Google, AOL, Disney and News
Corp., exploring alternative deals that would strengthen Yahoo's business and
relieve the pressure on it to be acquired.

On April 5, Microsoft, clearly impatient, threatened
Yahoo's board of directors with a proxy battle
if it wouldn't agree to a
buy-out in the next three weeks. That's the deadline that lapsed on Saturday.

"The focus will be on Microsoft tomorrow [Monday] to make some statement
about its intentions," said industry analyst Greg Sterling from Sterling
Market Intelligence.

While there is still a reasonable chance that Microsoft will launch a proxy
fight, it also seems much more likely than it did three weeks ago that Microsoft
will drop its bid, Sterling said. Microsoft's management was clearly expecting
a much smoother acquisition process, he said.

"Microsoft's tone during the initial call [announcing the bid] was that
this was pretty much 'fait accompli' and that they were already looking past
the deal towards the integration process," Sterling said. "Microsoft
has been surprised to a degree and really frustrated by the resistance."

    Add a comment

    Post a comment using one of these accounts
    Or join now
    At least 6 characters

    Note: Comment will appear soon after you have activated your account.
    Obscene/spam comments will be removed and accounts suspended.
    The information you submit is subject to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

    ITworld LIVE

    BusinessWhite Papers & Webcasts

    White Paper

    Insiders Can Ruin Your Company. Take Action.

    Did you know that 80 percent of threats to an organization come from the inside? The threat from insiders is often overlooked in organizations worldwide. This white paper from NetIQ, discusses key technology solutions that help to prevent and detect insider threats.

    White Paper

    Ten Steps to an Enterprise Mobility Strategy

    Enterprise employees are more mobile, relishing the ability to work productively anywhere, at any time. They may use any means to get connected, often creating financial and security risks for your company. Discover how to get control of your enterprise mobility strategy and ensure mobile worker productivity with these ten steps.

    White Paper

    What You Need to Know About the Costs of Mobility

    Mobile workers want to get connected anywhere, at any time, often at any cost. Enterprise mobility is often a hidden "black" budget in your company. Ensure that your traveling employees are productive everywhere, even while you control cost and security, through an enterprise mobility strategy.

    White Paper

    The 2011 iPass Mobile Enterprise Report

    This industry survey covers trends, recommendations and a policy guide on managing Enterprise Mobility for IT management and CIOs. Get data on employee device liability, as well as smartphone/tablet penetration, budget control and provisioning. Find out how your organization compares, how to ensure mobile worker productivity, and control costs.

    White Paper

    Smarter Commerce is redefining value chain visibility

    Smarter Commerce is redefining the value chain in the age of the customer. It starts with putting the customer at the center of your operations - which of itself is not a new idea - however, truly operationalizing this strategy is not easy.

    See more White Papers | Webcasts

    Ask a question

    Ask a Question