The saga of Podcaster, the iPhone App Store, and Apple being maybe a little evil
It's been bubbling along in the Apple rumorsphere lately, so I suppose it'd be worthwhile to briefly touch on the drama around Podcaster, the App Store application that Apple pulled because it duplicated functionality in iTunes. Quick takes:
- Daring Fireball points out why the act isn't something that Apple can't do, in some abstract righteous sense of "can't"; rather, he argues that it will just drive away developers who won't find out that they're app won't fly until they've already invested time and resources into building it, which will make it much less likely that they'll invest said time and resources in the first place, and which is ultimately not something that Apple actually wants.
- The New York Times Bits Blog busts out the term "capricious", and tries and fails to get some kind of official statement out of the head of the iPhone PR department. It's another instance of Apple's weird cult of secrecy just making them seem creepy and weird.
- Niall Kennedy provides a look inside the App Store, and also a review of the Podcaster app itself, in which he comes to the heretical conclusion: maybe Podcaster was rejected because it was kind of crappy? And even if it wasn't, maybe Apple should have said that anyway, as that would have staved off a storm of bad publicity?
- Finally, the Joy of Tech offers a fairly awesome cartoon explaining how these sorts of events might happen.
Sign up for ITworld's Daily newsletter
Follow ITworld on Twitter @IT_world
Brian Proffitt
Microsoft/Novell: Breaking Down the Coupon Numbers
Esther Schindler
Drupal's Dries Buytaert on Building the Next Drupal
Tom Henderson
Top Ten General Operating Systems Rants
pasmith
PS3 motion controller delayed; goes up against Project Natal
sjvn
Neolithic Windows security hole alive and well in Windows 7
claird
Perl source code comparison makes for good reading
mikelgan
Cell phones don't create stress or interrupt much
Sandra Henry-Stocker
How to: The Unix Interview
Where Google Chrome security fails: the password
I heard mention that the Chrome OS will have some sort of encryption available a la bitlocker. If it's possible to encrypt personal data using another password or key, then it may have potential for very secure data.... And Ubuntu has an 'encrypt home directory' option, perhaps google should follow suit.
- Dann
Join the conversation here
Quick, practical advice for IT pros. Made fresh daily.
- Ubuntu advances: Why Ubuntu server installations will surge in 2010
- Social media marketing: How to make friends with benefits
- More...
Want to cash in on your IT savvy? Send your tip to tips@itworld.com. If we post it, we'll send you a $25 Amazon e-gift card.
Microsoft is really losing
Microsoft is really losing it in the evil stakes these days. They used to be really good at evil.Now Apple is kicking their backsides for evil. When Steve Jobs goes "MuWAAAhahahaha!", the brainwashed minions listen. His henchmen are really loyal, not just getting paid to be.
Poor Ballmer.