Challenges mount for ultra-wideband wireless

Be the first to comment | 3I like it!
November 6, 2008, 09:47 PM —  Network World — 

Ultra-wideband wireless, which underlies wireless USB products, suffered another jolt recently when one UWB pioneer shut down operations.

WiQuest, a fabless semiconductor company in Allen, Texas, closed its doors when it couldn't raise additional funding. Intel's decision to scrub its UWB research, made months ago, surfaced into public view about the same time. And WiQuest rival Alereon announced it had acquired part of Stonestreet One's wireless USB business: its USB drivers.

Last May, Texas Instruments announced it was withdrawing from the WiMedia Alliance, which oversees the UWB specification and interoperability testing, and backing 802.11n Wi-Fi as the next underlying radio technology for the Bluetooth protocols, a project launched in February by the Bluetooth Special Interest Group. That seemed to push the SIG's plan to run Bluetooth over UWB, announced two years ago, to a lower priority.

And earlier this year, Sony announced its own UWB alternative: a short-range, low-power wireless technology, dubbed TransferJet, which has won the backing of more than a dozen of the world's biggest consumer-electronics companies.

On the plus side, start-up USB-chipmaker Staccato Communications announced that its new Ripcord2 family of single-chip CMOS USB silicon devices had won certification from the WiMedia Alliance. The Ripcord2 silicon supports additional frequencies (so vendors can build UWB products using one device that can work globally), hopping among channels (increasing range), sidestepping radar or cellular networks to avoid interference.

Sign up for ITworld's Daily newsletter
Follow ITworld on Twitter @IT_world

I like it!
Close

On Twitter now

uwb

Powered by Twitter
You are logged in | Sign out
Sign in and post to Twitter

What are you thinking?

Cancel Tweet sent

On Twitter now

Post a comment
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
peer-to-peer

Brian Proffitt
Microsoft/Novell: Breaking Down the Coupon Numbers

Esther Schindler
Drupal's Dries Buytaert on Building the Next Drupal

Tom Henderson
Top Ten General Operating Systems Rants

pasmith
PS3 motion controller delayed; goes up against Project Natal

sjvn
Neolithic Windows security hole alive and well in Windows 7

claird
Perl source code comparison makes for good reading

mikelgan
Cell phones don't create stress or interrupt much

Sandra Henry-Stocker
How to: The Unix Interview

 

Where Google Chrome security fails: the password
I heard mention that the Chrome OS will have some sort of encryption available a la bitlocker. If it's possible to encrypt personal data using another password or key, then it may have potential for very secure data.... And Ubuntu has an 'encrypt home directory' option, perhaps google should follow suit.
- Dann

Join the conversation here

The Daily Tip

The Daily TipQuick, practical advice for IT pros. Made fresh daily.

Hot tips:

Want to cash in on your IT savvy? Send your tip to tips@itworld.com. If we post it, we'll send you a $25 Amazon e-gift card.

Newsletters

Subscribe to ITWORLD TODAY and receive the latest IT news and analysis.

I would like to receive offers via email from ITworld partners.
By clicking submit you agree to the terms and conditions outlined in ITworld's privacy policy.
Marketplace