One of the loudest tangential stories coming out of the SXSW conference is about bad iPhone service. Apparently AT&T didn't anticipate just how many iPhones were suddenly going to be packed into the Austin area. (See Wired's "SXSW: AT&T's Spotty Service Frustrates iPhone Users" and Business Insider's "AT&T Fails The SXSW iPhone Test".) To their credit, AT&T apparently took the situation seriously.
Harry McCracken at Technologizer talked to an unnamed source with knowledge of the AT&T's response and said:
By 5pm yesterday [Saturday], AT&T realized it had a problem on its hands, and it spent four hours doubling capacity in downtown Austin–something it was planning to do anyhow, but over the course of a few months, not a few hours. It did so not by rolling out portable cell towers [...] but by borrowing capacity from other areas that didn’t need it as much–there’s only so much capacity to go around. [Source: iPhone Reception Problems Got You Down? You Need More Network Capacity. Now!]
I draw your attention to that number: four hours to double capacity. That's pretty impressive. I suppose they were scrambling to put a stop to a public relations nightmare, but it does make you wonder why they can't always address issues so quickly.
Business Insider shares a more official sounding, but still not cited, quote:
To accommodate unprecedented demand for mobile data and voice applications at SXSW, we are actively working this afternoon to add capacity to our cell sites serving downtown Austin. These efforts are ongoing, but we anticipate that customers should see improved network performance this evening and for the remainder of the event. We will continue to monitor network performance throughout the event, and will do everything possible to maximize network performance throughout. We apologize to customers who were inconvenienced during this surge in local network demand.[Source: AT&T Adding Capacity At SXSW To Deal With iPhone Crush]
I'm neither an iPhone owner nor at SXSW. If you're both of these, please share your experiences. Has the coverage improved for you? There still seems to be plenty of Tweets somehow escaping the confines of the conference!
Sign up for ITworld's Daily newsletter
Follow ITworld on Twitter @IT_world
Brian Proffitt
Microsoft/Novell: Breaking Down the Coupon Numbers
Esther Schindler
Drupal's Dries Buytaert on Building the Next Drupal
Tom Henderson
Top Ten General Operating Systems Rants
pasmith
PS3 motion controller delayed; goes up against Project Natal
sjvn
Neolithic Windows security hole alive and well in Windows 7
claird
Perl source code comparison makes for good reading
mikelgan
Cell phones don't create stress or interrupt much
Sandra Henry-Stocker
How to: The Unix Interview
Where Google Chrome security fails: the password
I heard mention that the Chrome OS will have some sort of encryption available a la bitlocker. If it's possible to encrypt personal data using another password or key, then it may have potential for very secure data.... And Ubuntu has an 'encrypt home directory' option, perhaps google should follow suit.
- Dann
Join the conversation here
Quick, practical advice for IT pros. Made fresh daily.
- Ubuntu advances: Why Ubuntu server installations will surge in 2010
- Social media marketing: How to make friends with benefits
- More...
Want to cash in on your IT savvy? Send your tip to tips@itworld.com. If we post it, we'll send you a $25 Amazon e-gift card.
Thank Goodness!
Thank goodness! My daughter bought an IPhone just to be able to demo their product at the event!Their booth is a Zen garden and the interactive demo is key!
So glad AT&T took the need seriously!
ATT
Can you imagine the Govererment acting this quickly? Just remember Congress broke up the Bell System (ATT) the one thing that actually worked in this country with a telephone system that was the envy of the world. At the same time these boobs left the US Post office intact which is always looking for a rate increaseSometimes it's easy - BUT IT'S NOT ALWAYS EASY!
Good for AT&T. Why not always this fast?This morning I was asked to increase capacity on a system our IT shop provides. Because we had untapped capacity we were able to respond in a couple of hours. However, if we had not had untapped capacity we'd have had to buy gear, and that might have taken a few weeks.
In this case AT&T had gear available and was able to scramble, but it's not reasonable to suggest that they could always do that....