Mobile & wireless

Unlimited iPhone broadband: Enjoy it while it lasts?

5 comments | 14I like it!
May 11, 2009, 10:01 AM — 

I got some comments on my Friday post (welcome, Slashdot readers!) that seemed to indicate that I didn't quite make my point properly in regards to the ongoing 3G expense of a WWAN-enabled Apple notebook or netbook. Obviously such devices will have Wi-Fi built in, and will default to such a connection where it is available; but from the perspective of your pocketbook, that won't really matter, as you'll be paying for some sort of mobile data plan from a cellular carrier regardless. And generally the current pricing strategy for such plans is to charge you a nontrivial flat fee for the month that covers either unlimited broadband or a reasonable person's version of the same (with the addendum that tech nerds like me and most of the people reading this blog use an unreasonable amount of broadband).

I bring this up again because it relates to a rather chilling statement in an article in today's Wall Street Journal on the iPhone's unique stress on AT&T's network. The article discusses the fact that Web browsing eats up a significant amount of bandwidth, and that building out the network to support the extra traffic will be expensive enough to dent or eliminate the profits from selling the iPhone (and smartphones like it). But the section that jumped out at me was the author's proposed remedy: "In the short term, carriers should abandon unlimited data pricing plans. Both AT&T and Verizon Wireless already charge extra for heavy users with wirelessly connected laptops. They will have to contemplate similar strategies for smartphone users."

The article notes that the traditional method that wireless carriers use to make more money is to add more customers, but that too many smartphone customers could have the opposite effect. I'd add the the traditional method -- traditional over the last five to ten years, anyway -- for telecoms in general to make cash is to sell plans that are, in theory or in practice, all-you-can eat. The slowly dying landline segment routinely sells people these days on unlimited long distance plans, which actually are more profitable than the traditional metered plans. Most cell phone plans today offer buckets of minutes so large that users don't use them up, along with unlimited texting plans. And, of course, Internet access has also traditionally been unmetered, with outrage meeting the telecoms' hesitant steps towards adding bandwidth caps. But, assuming that the numbers in the WSJ article are real and not some sinister plot by AT&T to squeeze even more ungodly profits from its customers, the all-you-can-eat model may be breaking down when it comes to digital data.

The thing that really makes the iPhone awesome, at least for me, is that it's always there.

Sign up for ITworld's Daily newsletter
Follow ITworld on Twitter @IT_world

I like it!
Comments

We are data junkies!

I get your point, they should let smart phone (iphone) users to tether them to our data-hungry devices for small additional fees, instead forcing us to pay 2-3 data plans.

I barely use 25mb of my unlimited iphone data plan every month, I do most of the reading on the go, e-mail check and stuff, I am most of the time around a wifi connection and then is when i do my heavy download, using 3g runs out your battery quicker than anything.

My wish:

Allow a regular cellphone connection on the iphone for actual phone calls at all times, like a regular plain ol' cellphone, I miss half of my incoming calls, edge for periodic connection, weather, email check etc, 3g for on the go internet usage, and wifi for heavy downloads. (This reminds me of my dad 15 years ago turning off his dial up after sending an email or loading every web page, when it was charged by the minute) but really this would greatly free-up their so called data towers. All this in a merry organized way. (is this too much to ask?)

I don't know if it has to come from ATT or Apple but surely this would make any product a better one.
| reply

If they inflict worry

If they inflict worry on the user, yeah, their gunna lose a customer or two. I'll be one of them...
If they wanted to be smart, they could swap out routers in the user's homes for Wifi routers that they could rent out for a small monthly fee. I know I have saved them a lot of grief and myself a lot of time by using my personal router and free wifi connections you find in hospitals, gas stations, restaurants, etc. OR! If they wanted to be really smart, they could help spread the wifi love by encouraging restaurants and such to get on board by recommending certain locations to obtain free (possibly also secure) wifi to the user (The motivation for the locations would be more custamah and AT&T, less tower usage). They could set the phones to automatically connect to these secure connections recommended by AT&T, while also alerting the user at the same time, just a simple, "Hey, yo, free wifi." Or you know... Just make it faster so they don't spend so much time connected to the tower. :D

There are endless options to every issue, we just have to find out what they ALL are, and which better benefits everyone.

-James
| reply

verizon unlimited plan

I have an Verizon wireless card for my computer with an unlimited plan. I am a heavy internet user with 300 emails a day for work. I just noticed that my service has been extremely downgraded and after i called they told me that since i am a heavy user they downgraded my service. so i have unlimited service but the service sucks.

They are doing this so they can get rid of older accounts which are truly unlimited.

| reply
peer-to-peer

Brian Proffitt
Microsoft/Novell: Breaking Down the Coupon Numbers

Esther Schindler
Drupal's Dries Buytaert on Building the Next Drupal

Tom Henderson
Top Ten General Operating Systems Rants

pasmith
PS3 motion controller delayed; goes up against Project Natal

sjvn
Neolithic Windows security hole alive and well in Windows 7

claird
Perl source code comparison makes for good reading

mikelgan
Cell phones don't create stress or interrupt much

Sandra Henry-Stocker
How to: The Unix Interview

 

Where Google Chrome security fails: the password
I heard mention that the Chrome OS will have some sort of encryption available a la bitlocker. If it's possible to encrypt personal data using another password or key, then it may have potential for very secure data.... And Ubuntu has an 'encrypt home directory' option, perhaps google should follow suit.
- Dann

Join the conversation here

The Daily Tip

The Daily TipQuick, practical advice for IT pros. Made fresh daily.

Hot tips:

Want to cash in on your IT savvy? Send your tip to tips@itworld.com. If we post it, we'll send you a $25 Amazon e-gift card.

Newsletters

Subscribe to ITWORLD TODAY and receive the latest IT news and analysis.

I would like to receive offers via email from ITworld partners.
By clicking submit you agree to the terms and conditions outlined in ITworld's privacy policy.
Marketplace