AT&T considering tiered iPhone data plan pricing?
For the first time in human history, idle speculation on a blog has been 100 PERCENT CONFIRMED by anonymously sourced details in a story from a major publication! To be specific, last week I was worrying that the all-you-can-eat-for-$30 data model was going to cause AT&T's feeble network to collapse; and this week, we learn that, to go along with whatever new low-cost version of the iPhone Apple is preparing to release, AT&T may be offering a cheaper capped data plan (according to Business Week, who heard it from consultant Richard Doherty of Envisioneering Group, who heard it from someone who he's not naming).
$20 is the figure being bandied about for this cheaper plan, though significantly absent from the rumors are what exactly the bandwidth caps would be. AT&T already has tiered pricing for its Data Connect service on other smartphones; the pricing matrix is pretty baffling, but it looks as if there are $20 plans that right now have 10 megabyte monthly caps, with every megabyte over that coming in at $1.90. I would call myself an enthusiastic if not obsessive user of the iPhone's data features, and I used about 170 MB of bandwidth last month, by comparison. I think that AT&T would have to recalibrate its tiers to fit with the iPhone's data use profile, but that's still a scary low number to use for comparison.
What's most interesting to me is that the thrust of the BW story is "See, the iPhone is finally getting cheaper, just like all the analysts have said that it would!" The fact that tiered pricing and bandwidth caps are making this cheapness possible is sort of coming in under the radar. It's smart to offer tiered data as a cheaper alternative rather than imposing bandwidth caps on everyone, but I wonder how long that will last. One reader, commenting on the BW story says, "All this makes no difference to me. AT&T only gives these breaks to NEW customers." But the flipside is that existing customers (like yours truly) may be the last people to find themselves with unlimited bandwith plans. An anonymous commentor on one of my earlier posts tells their story in a similar situation: "I have an Verizon wireless card for my computer with an unlimited plan. I am a heavy internet user with 300 emails a day for work. I just noticed that my service has been extremely downgraded and after I called they told me that since I am a heavy user they downgraded my service. So I have unlimited service but the service sucks. They are doing this so they can get rid of older accounts which are truly unlimited." I'm hoping that's not me a few years down the road!
Sign up for ITworld's Daily newsletter
Follow ITworld on Twitter @IT_world
jfruh
Apple syncing patent can't come soon enough
pasmith
New Twitter features borrow from 3rd party clients
Esther Schindler
Open Source Changes the Software Acquisition Process
mikelgan
How to set up continuous podcast play on the new iTunes
David Strom
Five important Windows 7 mobility features
sjvn
Guard your Wi-Fi for your own sake
Sandra Henry-Stocker
Grepping on Whole Words
Sidekick: The Good News & the Bad News
Either way you look at it Microsoft Data Center management did not follow standards or best practices in this failure. In which case it makes me wonder more about the outsourcing of corporate data much less personal data.
- mburton325
Join the conversation here
Quick, practical advice for IT pros. Made fresh daily.
Want to cash in on your IT savvy? Send your tip to tips@itworld.com. If we post it, we'll send you a $25 Amazon e-gift card.
170mb is nothing. I don't
170mb is nothing. I don't use my data plan a decent amount as use but there is a big difference, I use Pandora every time I am in my car. My month is coming to the end and I'm just shy of 900mb.If they got rid of an unlimited data plan, Pandora on the iPhone would slowly go away.
This is about profit not network capacity.
This move is about profit not about network capacity. If their network is congested it means that they are making money hand over fist selling iphones and contracts. Part of that money should go to upgrading their network if there truly are issues. The truth though is this is not about network capacity at all. AT&T see's that iphone users really like their phones and their only way to make better profits is to limit consumers access to their services. AT&T's whole business model is to limit consumer's access to services to make money. Data services are the "new" long distance charges.AT&T intentionally cripples data tethering on their other handsets as well. In order to get the level of service that I get for $60 a month on my Tmobile Blackberry would be $160 a month from AT&T. Obviously Tmobile is making a profit at $60 a month. And of course with my $60 a month service I get free data tethering something that would be an extra cost option on the AT&T network and something not even possible on the iphone.
Tethering
What I can't understand is that I bought and own an IPhone but I have to jail break the phone in order to tether it to my laptop. AT&T is just trying to make money off of something that should be FREE.FREE is not in AT&T's vocabulary though.
I shouldn't have to do anything to get something that I already paid for.
BTW the tethering that you pay for is $60.00 on a "FUZE or a Tilt" per month and then you have to pay extra if you go over 10 MB in downloads.
My point is I own the phone what right do they have to tell me how to use it.