Mobile & wireless

iPhone cut-and-paste: Mysteriously improved?

8 comments | 8I like it!
August 5, 2009, 11:34 PM — 

The iPhone's cut-and-paste functionality was one of the most long-awaited features of iPhone OS 3.0. Tech commentators everywhere had been foaming for months that Apple must have cut and paste or dire things would result. But I have to say that, while I'm not such a cultist that I don't see room for improvement in the phone, this was never that high on my list of must-haves. I only ever really wanted it in a few fairly specialized situations: when I wanted to text or e-mail someone a URL, say, or when the usually reliable data detector failed to recognize a phone number as such and I wanted to paste it into keypad dialer. I wasn't against cut and paste, mind you, but I wasn't waiting for it with bated breath either.

But what I found when I downloaded iPhone OS 3.0 was that cut-and-paste actually made my iPhone text experience more irritating. I may not be the sort of person who wants to move text from one app to another very often, but I am apparently the sort of person who like to go back into a sentence I've already written and muck around in it a bit. (Comes with being a professional writer, I guess; you get so attached to your own prose that you want it to look good even in an SMS message.) But once cut-and-paste came out, this suddenly became a chore; trying to drop the cursor into mid-sentence often selected the nearest word instead, or sometimes the whole sentence, depending on the app (and there were subtle differences from app to app). Oh, and you still couldn't paste a phone number into the dialer.

I had been meaning for a while to write a blog post about this on a slow Apple news day, and today seemed slow enough (except for an iPhone user revolt that's going unnoticed by anyone but obsessive tech insiders), so I got out my iPhone and my digital camera in an attempt to document my irritation. But lo and behold, every time I tried to reproduce the problem, the cursor acted exactly the way I wanted it to (except that, in the interest of documenting the problem, I didn't want it to act the way I wanted it to, if you follow).

So, faithful readers: what's the story? The only thing I've done that might have caused a change is upgrade to iPhone OS 3.0.1, which as far as I know only patched the nasty security hole that would have allowed attackers to take over the phone via a text message. Did it secretly improve the cut-and-paste experience as well? Or have my fingers just gotten better at the trick?

Sign up for ITworld's Daily newsletter
Follow ITworld on Twitter @IT_world

I like it!
Comments

Same Ol' Cut & Paste

I've never experienced the problems you describe. Once I realized that I could ignore the Select | Select All | Paste pop-up menu that appeared when I repositioned the cursor, all was fine. I really like that I can double-tap a word and just type over it. Just like a computer… fancy that. ;-)

And yes, I typed out this comment on my iPhone mk.1.
| reply

bah!

You kids today with your "telephones" and your "text".
| reply

You just got used to it, perhaps.

I havent noticed any improvements. It worked brilliantly when it came out, as it does now. I think maybe you just got used to it, which would explain the smoother experience you are having now. Its like all those complaints when people first started typing on the iPhone keypad. The complaints have settled down now that people have gotten used to working with it.
| reply
peer-to-peer

Brian Proffitt
Microsoft/Novell: Breaking Down the Coupon Numbers

Esther Schindler
Drupal's Dries Buytaert on Building the Next Drupal

Tom Henderson
Top Ten General Operating Systems Rants

pasmith
PS3 motion controller delayed; goes up against Project Natal

sjvn
Neolithic Windows security hole alive and well in Windows 7

claird
Perl source code comparison makes for good reading

mikelgan
Cell phones don't create stress or interrupt much

Sandra Henry-Stocker
How to: The Unix Interview

 

Where Google Chrome security fails: the password
I heard mention that the Chrome OS will have some sort of encryption available a la bitlocker. If it's possible to encrypt personal data using another password or key, then it may have potential for very secure data.... And Ubuntu has an 'encrypt home directory' option, perhaps google should follow suit.
- Dann

Join the conversation here

The Daily Tip

The Daily TipQuick, practical advice for IT pros. Made fresh daily.

Hot tips:

Want to cash in on your IT savvy? Send your tip to tips@itworld.com. If we post it, we'll send you a $25 Amazon e-gift card.

Newsletters

Subscribe to ITWORLD TODAY and receive the latest IT news and analysis.

I would like to receive offers via email from ITworld partners.
By clicking submit you agree to the terms and conditions outlined in ITworld's privacy policy.
Marketplace