Starent settles UTStarcom legal disputes for $3.5M

October 15, 2009, 02:30 PM —  IDG News Service — 

In the wake of its US$2.9 billion acquisition deal on Tuesday with Cisco Systems, Starent Networks has agreed to settle all its legal disputes with UTStarcom and pay the company $3.5 million.

UTStarcom and Starent both make mobile network equipment. UTStarcom, based in Alameda, California, has accused Starent of violating its patents on multiple technologies. Through the settlement, Starent will receive a perpetual royalty-free license to UTStarcom's patents, the companies said Thursday.

UTStarcom acquired most of the CommWorks business unit of 3Com in 2003.

In 2005, UTStarcom sued Starent in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California for allegedly infringing its patent on prepaid billing technology for packet data serving nodes, which link mobile networks to the Internet. In 2007, it sued Starent in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. It said several key employees from the CommWorks business unit had gone to work for Starent and used confidential and proprietary information to build competing products that violated UTStarcom patents. Among them was Gennady Sirota, who still serves as vice president of product management at Starent, according to the company's Web site. Both of these cases were still pending before the settlement was announced.

Starent, based in Tewksbury, Massachusetts, specializes in network elements that help wireless networks such as 3G, WiMax and LTE (Long-Term Evolution) interact with packet data networks. Its technology is expected to help Cisco expand its presence in fast-growing mobile data networks. Cisco's acquisition of Starent is expected to close in the first half of next year.

IDG News Service

Sign up for ITworld's Daily newsletter
Follow ITworld on Twitter @IT_world

I like it!
Close

On Twitter now

Starent Networks

Powered by Twitter
You are logged in | Sign out
Sign in and post to Twitter

What are you thinking?

Cancel Tweet sent

On Twitter now

Post a comment
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
peer-to-peer

Brian Proffitt
Microsoft/Novell: Breaking Down the Coupon Numbers

Esther Schindler
Drupal's Dries Buytaert on Building the Next Drupal

Tom Henderson
Top Ten General Operating Systems Rants

pasmith
PS3 motion controller delayed; goes up against Project Natal

sjvn
Neolithic Windows security hole alive and well in Windows 7

claird
Perl source code comparison makes for good reading

mikelgan
Cell phones don't create stress or interrupt much

Sandra Henry-Stocker
How to: The Unix Interview

 

Where Google Chrome security fails: the password
I heard mention that the Chrome OS will have some sort of encryption available a la bitlocker. If it's possible to encrypt personal data using another password or key, then it may have potential for very secure data.... And Ubuntu has an 'encrypt home directory' option, perhaps google should follow suit.
- Dann

Join the conversation here

The Daily Tip

The Daily TipQuick, practical advice for IT pros. Made fresh daily.

Hot tips:

Want to cash in on your IT savvy? Send your tip to tips@itworld.com. If we post it, we'll send you a $25 Amazon e-gift card.

Newsletters

Subscribe to ITWORLD TODAY and receive the latest IT news and analysis.

I would like to receive offers via email from ITworld partners.
By clicking submit you agree to the terms and conditions outlined in ITworld's privacy policy.
Marketplace