March 15, 2012, 2:58 PM —
What's with these American smartphone owners getting all "small-claims courty" about contract violations and blabbing to the media just to make a beloved national carrier look bad? Don't they know they're supposed to take their reaming from corporate America silently and with a grateful smile, like good little Citizen/Consumers?
Matthew Spaccarelli, an iPhone user and AT&T customer who recently won $850 in small-claims court over the wireless carrier reneging on its promise of unlimited data service, isn't following the script, much to AT&T's public embarrassment.
Last year the company began "throttling" the accounts of the heaviest users among its 17 million smartphone customers who had signed up for unlimited data access.
Spaccarelli, of Simi Valley, Calif., didn't care for the change and pursued a legal remedy. He won. But AT&T doesn't want it to rest there, for about 17 million obvious reasons. The company not only is appealing the judge's decision, it's both trying to settle with Spaccarelli and intimidate him. That's right, AT&T is playing both good cop and bad cop.
AT&T's "stick" is that "Spaccarelli has admitted that he has used his iPhone to provide Internet access for other devices, a practice known as tethering, which violates AT&T's contract terms," the Associated Press reports.
This is an outrage, of course, because only corporations are allowed to violate consumer contracts. It says so right in the Constitution! But this is what happens when you have activist judges who apparently are more at home at an OWS rally than a hall of justice!
In fact, maybe Spaccarelli was emboldened by those why-don't-they-take-a-bath-and-get-a-job street protesters.