Netflix isn't swamping the Internet; ISPs are overstating their congestion problems

Netflix is popular, but almost all its traffic is last mile -- not the backbone ISPs whine about

By Kevin Fogarty  8 comments

A report issued Tuesday showing Netflix makes up a third of total Internet traffic is inaccurate enough – or at least the reports about it are inaccurate enough – to show not very many people in either the press or vendor marketing understand the network they base their business on.

 

There are two important points here, both relevant to people who do IT for a living, not just those who either dislike data caps or do like Netflix:

First, the report didn't say Netflix eats a third of the whole Internet; that assumption was off base enough to prompt Forbes to run a piece trying to correct it, but not quite succeeding.

Sandvine – an Ontario-based networking vendor – issued a report Tuesday estimating that streaming media from Netflix make up 30 percent of downstream traffic during peak times.

What Sandvine meant was that Netflix traffic spiked heavily during prime time – when most people are home and watching something other than what's on TV – but only across the last mile.

TechCrunch posted some graphics showing what's travelling across the nation's networks during peak times, and in what volumes. Netflix comes out on top, but only with the caveats below.

Netflix uses content-distribution services to make sure its content is located close to customers, so when you click Play the file you see is being downloaded from somewhere nearby, not from Netflix' central database.

The portion of the network Netflix hogs is only the ISP's edge connections – from a distribution hub to the house of Netflix' subscribers.

The heaviest traffic is in spikes during one part of the day, which is irrelevant from a network-infrastructure standpoint. Even if the spike is only an hour, the network segment through which the spike passes still has to have enough capacity to handle it.

For the ISPs that is the good news, though they already know this and simply leave the good news out when complaining they must be allowed to throttle Netflix to avoid having their networks swamped.

Netflix doesn't swamp the ISPs' backbones or even their high-volume network spokes because its content is distributed and cached ahead of time. When it launches it travels only across the edge, vastly reducing the logic behind arguments by AT&T, Comcast and Verizon that they have to keep adding to their core networks to keep up with bandwidth-sucking competition from Netflix.

The second point that's relevant for working geeks is that the level and reasoning behind data caps from AT&T and other ISPs vastly understimates what a "normal" level of Internet use really is.

That affects consumer accounts most directly, but ripples out to business ISP accounts as well, in both data caps and data-consumption or bandwidth rates.

When AT&T announced its data caps – 150GB per month for DSL users and 250GB for broadband – it called the data levels "generous" and said limits would only affect 2 percent of its customers.

It turns out Netflix users take up an average of 40GB per month just from streaming media, according to a different Sandvine report (PDF),

Users that stream data through a device other than a PC – an Xbox or other game console, for example – use twice that amount of bandwidth for the same content.

That puts DSL users who stream movies through their Xbox 360s two-thirds of the way to their data cap every month before they download a single app or send a single email.

It also doesn't include downloading YouTube videos or games, even the demos of which can rush anyone toward the data-cap limit without realizing it.

The Nazi zombies map for Call of Duty alone is 1.4GB.

Download the demo for Office 2010 Professional and you're on the hook for another 688MB.

It eats up the bandwidth quickly, but your ISP will be there to make sure you don't go over, or that you pay $10 for every 50GB you go over the limit every month.

That's the cost of allowing the FCC to avoid limiting the price-gouging plans ISPs impose on consumers and small businesses, rather than see through the smoke and realize it's not compensating for Netflix that is taking up most of the carriers' R&D and network-upgrade work.

It's the effort to upgrade the nets to support their own streaming-media services, which not only compete with Netflix, but also come supported by internal business cases that have to show how quickly each new major upgrade will pay for itself through new services or the ability to support more subscribers.

Upgrades justified to regulators by saying Netflix is about to bring down the Internet go into the books under the category Gravy, and slide straight down to Net Profit at the bottom of the page.

8 comments

    GasGalileo_tw206916196 39 weeks ago
    You need to improve your writing.
    Abigail-Laurent-Terrasson
    @TheOtherStephen, on the contrary, the price of bandwidth in the core has been decreasing (and continues to do so) rapidly. It's the pricing at the edge that is often manipulated and controlled.

    And you betray a severe misunderstanding of the impact of CDN's to core network congestion with your example. Once Netflix streams a set of bits to their CDN, those bits don't travel the core ever again. They only travel from the CDN edge nodes to the customers' edge devices (for as many times as the customers request that data.)

    And when we speak of core, we mean the networks that interconnect the major (Tier 1) networks worldwide. These are multi-terabit capacity networks, and they're only growing in size and capacity, while declining in cost.
    Mark Hernandez
    Mark Hernandez 39 weeks ago
    All the smart tech-types reading this, like myself, still are struggling with these tortured descriptions of complex systems. If we can't understand and adequately describe it, well….

    Regardless, the ISPs have already won. In the last 24 hours I've heard from multiple people "Did you read in today's paper that 1/3 of all network traffic is Netflix? That's amazing!" even though the newspaper article did mention "peak times."

    Until we tech types push hard to move beyond communicating complicated things using only over-simplified (and over-burdened) text and NOT use visuals, we'll just continue to suffer from growing "misinformation overload."

    Politics is ONLY about misinformation management and utilization -- whether it's government or IT-related. Corporations are always at play.

    I don't expect things will improve in the decades to come.
    It is amazing how ISPs are quick to highlight any information that makes their case with complete disregard to what really is happening in the real world. Netflix has made their video on demand less and less attractive as they are limited from where they can be seen. I love watching Netflix on all my mobile devices as well.

    I cannot for the life of me get the Optimum iPad app to play video at home, Netflix just works.
    Yadda
    Yadda 39 weeks ago
    I also wonder about the "partnerships" and mergers/buyouts. Less players, less competition, higher prices, lower quality.
    Yadda
    Yadda 39 weeks ago
    @TheOtherStephen: you mean AT&T should really invest in the core of its edge networks? Imagine that: investing to grow business by satisfying customer needs. Meanwhile, no matter the commercials, my AT&T iPhone call quality gets worse.
    Gregory White
    Gregory White 39 weeks ago
    This is an excellent write-up, Mr. Fogarty!

    @TheOtherStephen : Great comment!! With the reality of Usage Based Billing, many average users, non-technical users (like myself, to some extent), want a real-world justification for the necessity of data caps. However, based on your breakdown, as I'm interpreting it, it would seem that as long as customer "speed packages" do not exceed the DS-3 or OC-3 thresholds offered per chassis then there really should not be any bandwidth problems (barring an oversold market). PLEASE correct me if I'm wrong because I AM NOT an expert on bandwidth in any way.

    There are clearly real issues with the sharing of bandwidth but I don't believe data caps are the BEST answer in dealing with those issues. It seems more sensible to raise the flat-rate charged as a means to draw in more revenue for infrastructure improvements. Maybe even consider lowering the speeds on the higher "speed packages".

    UBB is a system that attempts to control the customers' internet usage and penalize them for going beyond certain limits on a commodity that should not be metered in the first place. Data should NEVER be metered as a utility. Data is not an item of "economic scarcity". Data is not consumed. Data is "dirt-cheap". It's in limitless supply thus making it of little (pennies on the dollar) value. People who deal in data storage are concerned about data. ISPs deal in DATA TRANSFER (bandwidth) at varying rates.

    Why monitor and potentially penalize PAYING customers for using the internet freely? If ISPs want or need more revenue they can just raise the current rates. If they want to conserve or streamline resources they can adjust the "speed packages". There are so many other solutions that can be implemented. Why UBB???
    TheOtherStephen 39 weeks ago
    I think you are confusing your terms regarding "edge" and "core". To an ISP, the core is the internal network that goes from the edge to the customer. Just because the NetFlix bandwidth may be coming in through a relatively inexpensive edge connection it still has to travel through the core network to the customer. The core network for a DSL provider for example is largely made up of 45Mbps DS-3 connections, or 155Mbps OC-3 connections, with thousands of customers sharing that bandwidth per chassis.

    Think of it this way, if AT&T provisioned 1000 customers on 45Mbps of bandwidth, and a new network service come in that increases the *peak* demand on that bandwidth, either they have to decrease the number of customers on the router, or upgrade the hardware of the router to handle a larger bandwidth connection. Either way it is more expensive in the *core*.

    Core network gear prices have not gotten cheaper the same way that edge bandwidth has gone down.

      Add a comment

      Post a comment using one of these accounts
      Or join now
      At least 6 characters

      Note: Comment will appear soon after you have activated your account.
      Obscene/spam comments will be removed and accounts suspended.
      The information you submit is subject to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

      ITworld LIVE

      NetworkingWhite Papers & Webcasts

      Webcast On Demand

      The Higher-Bandwidth, Lower-Cost Connection of Choice: 10GBASE-T LAN on Motherboard

      Learn how Expedient, a cloud provider, is using 10 Gigabit Ethernet to boost its services and rein in costs.

      Sponsor: Intel and Dell

      White Paper

      HP X5000 G2 Network Storage System Data Sheet

      The new HP X5000 G2 Network Storage Systems is ideal for midsize companies. The solution is a two-node Network Attached Storage (NAS) cluster with shared storage built on HP BladeSystem technology. In this datasheet, you will find a in-depth look into the HP X5000 G2 Network Storage Systems including key features and benefits that set this unit apart from the rest of those in the market.

      White Paper

      HP X5000 G2 Network Storage System Quickspecs

      The new HP X5000 G2 Network Storage Systems powered by Microsoft Windows Storage Server 2008 R2 Enterprise edition are Network Attached Storage (NAS), with two-node integrated into a converged 3U chassis, that are designed for a better file serving experience. In this quickspecs flyer, you will explore a view of the key features and benefits that set this unit apart from the rest of those in the market.

      White Paper

      HP X5000 G2 Network Storage System Ease of Use, High-Availability, Performance, and Interoperability Evaluation

      Today's small and medium-size businesses (SMBs) have ever-growing storage needs. This often translates into a requirement for terabytes of storage and a level of high-availability typically associated with large-scale, enterprise deployments, managed without having a large IT staff. Given IT staffing constraints, storage solutions for SMBs must be easily installed and managed by existing IT staff, which is why HP introduced the new HP X5000 G2 Network Storage Systems, powered by Intel® Xeon® Processors. Independent tests show the HP X5520 G2 Network Storage System can be installed out-of-the-box to a fully-functional, high availability system joined to a Microsoft domain in less than 90 minutes with the help of an automated HP Configuration Tasks Tool guide.

      White Paper

      Optimizing Enterprise WLAN Performance

      This white paper reviews business and technology trends impacting enterprise wireless networks and describes how HP Mobility Solutions in general and HP Mobility Traffic Manager in particular enable the industry's most scalable, cost-effective and manageable wireless network deployments.

      See more White Papers | Webcasts

      Ask a question

      Ask a Question