DNS patches cause problems, developers admit

Be the first to comment | 8I like it!
July 30, 2008, 12:31 PM —  Computerworld — 

Patches released earlier this month to quash a critical bug in the Domain Name System (DNS) have slowed servers running BIND, the Internet's most popular DNS software, and crippled some systems using Windows Server.

Paul Vixie, who heads the Internet Systems Consortium (ISC), the group responsible for the BIND (Berkeley Internet Name Domain) software, acknowledged that there were problems with the July 8 fix that was rolled out as part of a multivendor update meant to patch a cache poisoning flaw discovered months before by researcher Dan Kaminsky.

"During the development cycle, we became aware of a potential performance issue on high-traffic recursive servers, defined as those seeing a query volume of greater than 10,000/queries per second," said Vixie in a message posted Monday afternoon to a BIND mailing list. "Given the limited time frame and associated risks, we chose to finish the patches ASAP and accelerate our work on the next point releases that would address the high-volume server performance concerns.

"Our immediate goal was to make patches publicly available as soon as possible," Vixie explained.

Vixie wasn't specific about the extent of the performance problems facing high-volume DNS servers, but he said that a second round of patches, due later this week, will remedy port allocation issues and "allow TCP queries and zone transfers while issuing as many outstanding UDP queries as possible."

Versions of the second update, which will be designated P2 when they're unveiled, are currently available in beta form for BIND 9.4.3 and BIND 9.5.1.

Sign up for ITworld's Daily newsletter
Follow ITworld on Twitter @IT_world

I like it!
Close

On Twitter now

DNS flaw

Powered by Twitter
You are logged in | Sign out
Sign in and post to Twitter

What are you thinking?

Cancel Tweet sent

On Twitter now

Post a comment
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
peer-to-peer

Brian Proffitt
Microsoft/Novell: Breaking Down the Coupon Numbers

Esther Schindler
Drupal's Dries Buytaert on Building the Next Drupal

Tom Henderson
Top Ten General Operating Systems Rants

pasmith
PS3 motion controller delayed; goes up against Project Natal

sjvn
Neolithic Windows security hole alive and well in Windows 7

claird
Perl source code comparison makes for good reading

mikelgan
Cell phones don't create stress or interrupt much

Sandra Henry-Stocker
How to: The Unix Interview

 

Where Google Chrome security fails: the password
I heard mention that the Chrome OS will have some sort of encryption available a la bitlocker. If it's possible to encrypt personal data using another password or key, then it may have potential for very secure data.... And Ubuntu has an 'encrypt home directory' option, perhaps google should follow suit.
- Dann

Join the conversation here

The Daily Tip

The Daily TipQuick, practical advice for IT pros. Made fresh daily.

Hot tips:

Want to cash in on your IT savvy? Send your tip to tips@itworld.com. If we post it, we'll send you a $25 Amazon e-gift card.

Newsletters

Subscribe to ITWORLD TODAY and receive the latest IT news and analysis.

I would like to receive offers via email from ITworld partners.
By clicking submit you agree to the terms and conditions outlined in ITworld's privacy policy.
Marketplace