The application configuration conundrum
Where does all the money go when you install a line-of-business software
application? Obviously there is the cost of the software product and
perhaps the other software and hardware pieces required to make it
function. There is the ongoing cost of system management and perhaps
there are training costs for staff. What else is there?
In an ideal world, that should be just about it. However, as we all
know, unless the product is very simple or very commoditized, or both,
there is one big outstanding cost.
I speak of the potentially long and potentially costly exercise known as
"configuration".
Application configuration cost is something an Einstein-like thinker
should take a close look at. Just as the speed of light is constant no
matter what, it appears that application configuration costs (at least
in terms of elapsed time) are constant no matter what. In particular,
the time taken to configure an application appears to be independent of
how much money you spent on it.
Let me try and express that in more concrete terms. Imagine that two
identical twins set off in opposite directions to run identical business
ventures.
The first twin installs a set of open source components to make up the
required software application. The software cost is zero or so close to
zero that it is zero for all practical purposes. It then takes two
months (at X dollars a day) to configure the software to the needs of
the business.
The second twin installs a group of best of breed, commercial
applications. The capital cost is significant. It then takes two months
(at Y dollars a day) to configure the software to the needs of the
business.
Odd, don't you think?
Then there is the nature of application configuration itself. An
endlessly fascinating and eclectic activity! At one end of the spectrum
we have configuration by modifying a few parameter files. At the other
end of the spectrum we have fully blown custom programming to effect the
required configuration. When does configuration stop and custom
application development start?
Perhaps it is my imagination but I get the impression that as
applications get more and more flexible and complex and abstract, the
need for configuration is growing apace. So much so, that I have seen
examples where the distinction between "product" and "collection of more
or less re-usable bits and bobs plus a Java/c# compiler" blurs
significantly.
Furthermore, the growing use of powerful scripting technologies like
Javascript, Python, Tcl and so on make it possible to do at
configuration time, effectively anything you could do back in the
development shop.
Sign up for ITworld's Daily newsletter
Follow ITworld on Twitter @IT_world
Brian Proffitt
Microsoft/Novell: Breaking Down the Coupon Numbers
Esther Schindler
Drupal's Dries Buytaert on Building the Next Drupal
Tom Henderson
Top Ten General Operating Systems Rants
pasmith
PS3 motion controller delayed; goes up against Project Natal
sjvn
Neolithic Windows security hole alive and well in Windows 7
claird
Perl source code comparison makes for good reading
mikelgan
Cell phones don't create stress or interrupt much
Sandra Henry-Stocker
How to: The Unix Interview
Where Google Chrome security fails: the password
I heard mention that the Chrome OS will have some sort of encryption available a la bitlocker. If it's possible to encrypt personal data using another password or key, then it may have potential for very secure data.... And Ubuntu has an 'encrypt home directory' option, perhaps google should follow suit.
- Dann
Join the conversation here
Quick, practical advice for IT pros. Made fresh daily.
- Ubuntu advances: Why Ubuntu server installations will surge in 2010
- Social media marketing: How to make friends with benefits
- More...
Want to cash in on your IT savvy? Send your tip to tips@itworld.com. If we post it, we'll send you a $25 Amazon e-gift card.






