Printers, coffee machines and razor blades
I bought a color printer the other day. The kind that will print very
respectable photographs from digital cameras as long as you use the
right type of glossy paper and the right type of color cartridge. Both
were bundled in the box and the box looked cheap to me.
I'm such a sucker for a good deal. I think I can spot one when I see one
too. I'm an informed consumer - or so I like to think. Marketing people
love people like me - an over-confident idiot with a credit card.
One day after the purchase of my printer, I was clean out of glossy
paper and clean out of color cartridge. No problem I thought, I'll just
pick up a replacement. I picked up the catalog and looked up the price
of the "consumables". The was an instantaneous sharp, searing pain in my
wallet. These photo printers are cheap to buy but they are certainly not
cheap to run!
I hasten to add that once I calmed down and looked at the situation
afresh, I did not feel too badly. The initial cost of the printer is
simply not a reflection of the total cost of ownership. Once that sank
in, calm returned.
The experience got me thinking of all the other areas in my life where a
similar pricing structure exists. The classic example of course, is the
"give away the razor and sell the blades" example. Like many of my ilk,
I wear a beard and thus razor blades are not high on my shopping list
for consumables. I do however, use a mobile phone. Mobile phones are
also very cheap to buy - the caveat being that you must sign up to a one
year contract with a telecommunications provider to avail of the
discounted price. With the aid of the mobile phone, I consume phone
minutes. The inhabitants of my office building consume a lot of coffee.
The machine for making it came "free" with the contract to supply the
coffee and filters.
Top on my list of professional consumables (surprise, surprise) is
software. However, software is not famous for business models based on
the razors/blades pattern. Could it be? Should it be? I think these are
interesting questions.
Look at the capital cost of software in today's world. In competitive
markets, we are seeing a race to zero for commoditized applications. The
Internet is driving the costs of software access, reproduction and
distribution down ever lower. Combine this with the rise and rise of
open source - with its built-in zero price point for the software itself
and what have you got? A situation which parallels the color printer
business?
We are perhaps, headed to where printers and mobile phones have ended
up. That is to say, the initial cost of software will be either zero or
deeply discounted from fair value. The business model for applications
will be driven entirely by the lock-in that can be achieved so that
customers come back to the source (no pun intended) of the software for
all the consumables.
But what are these "consumables" in the software world?
Sign up for ITworld's Daily newsletter
Follow ITworld on Twitter @IT_world
jfruh
Apple syncing patent can't come soon enough
pasmith
New Twitter features borrow from 3rd party clients
Esther Schindler
Open Source Changes the Software Acquisition Process
mikelgan
How to set up continuous podcast play on the new iTunes
David Strom
Five important Windows 7 mobility features
sjvn
Guard your Wi-Fi for your own sake
Sandra Henry-Stocker
Grepping on Whole Words
Sidekick: The Good News & the Bad News
Either way you look at it Microsoft Data Center management did not follow standards or best practices in this failure. In which case it makes me wonder more about the outsourcing of corporate data much less personal data.
- mburton325
Join the conversation here
Quick, practical advice for IT pros. Made fresh daily.
Want to cash in on your IT savvy? Send your tip to tips@itworld.com. If we post it, we'll send you a $25 Amazon e-gift card.












