Manuals, conversations and RSS
At the moment I am re-emerging from a long session of a well known IT
adventure game known as "catch the randomly recurring problem in the
mission critical system".
Step one in fixing any IT problem is the creation of a test "harness"
which can be used to repeatedly re-create the problem. Once that is in
place, standard scientific methodology takes over. Change things one at
a time until the problem goes away. All other things being equal, the
last thing changed is the source of your problem.
The more distributed, complex and multi-cellular our IT systems become,
the harder it is to create these test harnesses. On numerous occasions
during the debug cycle, I found myself on the Web, chasing down error
messages, reading manuals, reading postings from other developers.
Actually, mostly reading postings from other developers.
Looking back on it, I think it is fair to say that I would not have
solved the problem without the Web. A strong statement I think you will
agree. A statement that begs the question: "what did we do before the
Web? How did complex systems get debugged without it?"
Well, we did. Just as our forefathers survived without antibiotics,
television, Kinkos and chocolate brownies, so too developers of
yesteryear survived without the Web.
I don't think we build systems any better these days than we used to
mind you. It is just that now, thanks to the Web, we have a higher
threshold before we hit information asphyxiation - the point at which
progress is impossible without more information.
These days, thanks to the Web, we have a lot more access to stuff which
means, in turn that we use a lot more stuff. Which, in turn means we
need yet more access to stuff. Vicious circle or progress? You choose.
Personally, I doubt that it would be possible to, say, build a complex
J2EE based system just using the vendor manuals and without using the
Web. The higher information threshold it provides has become an
indispensable tool.
I'm not happy with the word 'information' as I have used in here. The
Web certainly provides raw information in abundance but I think the
critical thing it provides to IT practitioners these days is access to
conversations - not merely raw information. Conversations which, for the
most part, take place from consumer to consumer. Developers talk to each
other, exchange questions and answers. Theories and snake oil solutions
go to and fro. They talk, the rest of us listen.
Returning to my marathon debugging session, here is a rough calculation
of where I spent my debugging time:
Vendor manuals: 10%
Googling: 20%
Reading developer blogs, user mailing lists etc.: 70%
Note the very low percentage of time using the "official" resources from
the vendors of the applications involved.
I solved my problem, not by reading the manual but by lurking in, and
later participating in an electronic conversation about the vendor's
software.
Sign up for ITworld's Daily newsletter
Follow ITworld on Twitter @IT_world
Esther Schindler
If the comments are ugly, the code is ugly
claird
SVG a graphics format for 21st century
pasmith
Take Chrome OS for a test spin
Sandra Henry-Stocker
Solaris Tip: Have Your Files Changed Since Installation?
jfruh
Android fragments vs. the iPhone monolith
mikelgan
What Gizmodo missed about the Pro WX Wireless USB disk drive
Sidekick: The Good News & the Bad News
Either way you look at it Microsoft Data Center management did not follow standards or best practices in this failure. In which case it makes me wonder more about the outsourcing of corporate data much less personal data.
- mburton325
Join the conversation here
Quick, practical advice for IT pros. Made fresh daily.
Want to cash in on your IT savvy? Send your tip to tips@itworld.com. If we post it, we'll send you a $25 Amazon e-gift card.













