Bridging gap between shared and dedicated hosting

January 9, 2003, 12:00 AM —  ITworld — 

Real estate used to be one of the most important factors in running a
business. The financial services company I worked for years ago was
located in San Francisco's "Tenderloin" district, a disagreeable section
of town where reputable companies never headquartered. When we moved to
the glitzy "financial district" into an office overlooking the bay, we
gained millions of dollars of business, sometimes just by virtue of
entertaining clients in our new luxurious offices. We looked successful,
therefore we became successful.

Real estate is still important, but not brick and mortar real estate.
Your virtual real estate is what determines your status as an e-commerce
enterprise, and what you are capable of accomplishing. You can have your
headquarters in the worst slums in town, but if you have a nice Web site
with good e-commerce facilities and connectivity through your extranet,
everybody will think you're a Fortune 1000 company.

The Web site, of course, must live somewhere. Its cyberspace home can
take the form of a shared space or a dedicated space. Shared hosting is
the low-budget approach, much like what you did in college when you
shared a house with ten other students. It saves money, and it's
adequate for many small businesses who don't really need the power of a
dedicated hosting solution. Shared hosting simply places your Web site
on a common server with several other companies' Web sites.

Dedicated hosting, on the other hand, is more costly, since it dedicates
a single server to your Web presence, and requires more in terms of
administration. You get more power, control, and space, and larger
businesses (and many midsize ones) use this approach.

The middle ground takes the form of the virtual private server (VPS), a
low-cost alternative that provides small and midsize businesses with
much of the same power enjoyed by larger corporations with dedicated
solutions. The VPS works like a stand-alone server, even though multiple
VPSs run on a single system. The user of the VPS gets a lot of things
you don't get with a shared hosting solution, like full root access,
application services, and quality of service guarantees. Although the
VPS shares the same physical server with other VPSs, each VPS still has
its own unique file system. The virtual nature of the VPS isolates it
from any performance impact that may otherwise filter over from other
presences running on the same physical server. If another VPS is
experiencing heavy traffic or CPU load, it will not have any impact on
other private servers on the same box. Each VPS also has its own set of
IP addresses.

Price-wise, it's only a little more than a shared service, but a lot
less than a dedicated service. There are still only a handful of
providers. USonyx (http://www.usonyx.com) offers Linux-based VPS plans
with a good set of applications, services, support and tools. USonyx
partnered with SWsoft to create the offering, using Virtuozzo
(http://www.virtuozzo.com) technology. Virtuozzo takes the old concept
of creating partitions on mainframes to create virtual environments, and
expands it onto Intel-based hardware. As a result, the new virtual
environment gets mainframe-style features, including security,
performance isolation, and scalability.

» posted by ITworld staff

ITworld

Sign up for ITworld's Daily newsletter
Follow ITworld on Twitter @IT_world

I like it!
Post a comment
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
peer-to-peer

Esther Schindler
If the comments are ugly, the code is ugly

claird
SVG a graphics format for 21st century

pasmith
Take Chrome OS for a test spin

Sandra Henry-Stocker
Solaris Tip: Have Your Files Changed Since Installation?

sjvn
64-bits of protection?

jfruh
Android fragments vs. the iPhone monolith

mikelgan
What Gizmodo missed about the Pro WX Wireless USB disk drive

 

Sidekick: The Good News & the Bad News
Either way you look at it Microsoft Data Center management did not follow standards or best practices in this failure. In which case it makes me wonder more about the outsourcing of corporate data much less personal data.
- mburton325

Join the conversation here

The Daily Tip

The Daily TipQuick, practical advice for IT pros. Made fresh daily.

Hot tips:

Want to cash in on your IT savvy? Send your tip to tips@itworld.com. If we post it, we'll send you a $25 Amazon e-gift card.

Newsletters

Subscribe to ITWORLD TODAY and receive the latest IT news and analysis.

I would like to receive offers via email from ITworld partners.
By clicking submit you agree to the terms and conditions outlined in ITworld's privacy policy.
Featured Sponsor

AISO founders envisioned a Web hosting company that was environmentally friendly. While the company employed energy-efficient innovations like solar panels, its infrastructure produced unacceptable power and cooling requirements. Find out how AISO leveraged AMD technology to overcome their challenge in this case study white paper.

In this whitepaper, Scalar explores the opportunity to change the landscape with respect to mission critical databases built around Oracle. Leveraging technologies such as Linux, high-end commodity processing power and Oracle RAC technology to architect, design, build and maintain database infrastructure that delivers maximum availability, reliability and performance at a fraction of traditional cost.

On a typical day, weather.com, the Web site for The Weather Channel in Atlanta, serves up between 15 million and 20 million page views. But in September 2004, when back-to-back hurricanes ransacked Florida, the peak traffic on one day more than tripled: over 70 million page views by more than 7 million unique visitors. Read the full success story now.

Marketplace