Blog Insight: More ill-conceived IT security legislation IT INSIGHTS --- 08/14/2007
Dan Blacharski
As an American, I'm relieved to know that the United States is not
unique in its propensity to dispense technology-related laws that make
no sense. Last week, I wrote about how the Feds pointed the finger of
blame at P2P software purveyors for its own security failings, rather
than own up to the fact that they just don't know how to secure their
own networks. This week, it's the German parliament that takes the prize
for just not getting it.
Germany's new anti-hacking law, approved in May and implemented last
week, was designed to target dangerous attacks on computer networks in
both the public and private sectors. The new law specifically highlights
denial-of-service attacks and sabotage as punishable crimes, as well it
should. If a hacker brings down a network, steals information, or causes
a business or public agency to lose time and money, then that hacker
should suffer the consequences.
But the problem with the well-intentioned law is that it defines
"hacking" as simply gaining access to secure data, even if nothing is
stolen. The potential for trouble here is what has caused concern among
the blogosphere on both sides of the Atlantic. It is well known among
security experts and analysts that the "white hats" often use so-called
hacker tools to test the security of a network, and expose
vulnerabilities so that they can be corrected before the "black hats"
get to them. Dissemination and use of these tools will now be illegal in
Germany. The trouble is, the bad guys will stay there, and all the good
guys that use hacking tools to protect, are now leaving Germany.
KisMAC is one such group, which created a tool to detect security
vulnerabilities in wireless networks. They are relocating in
Netherlands. A notice on their German Web site (http://www.kismac.de)
pulled no punches about how they feel about the new law, reading: "One
of the major weapons exporters in the world prohibits production and
distribution of security software (StGB Sec. 202c). From a nation of
poets and thinkers to a nation of bureaucrats and ignoramuses. Visit
KisMAC in the Netherlands soon." And Security4all
(http://security4all.blogspot.com/2007/07/german-law-vs-security-tools-fallout.html)
spotted the new opening page of the Chaos Computer Club (www.ccc.de),
which puts tongue in cheek and says (in German) something to the effect
of The German government changed the Internet back into a flower
meadow. Since there are no more security problems, we don't need any
security tools any more. Should you see any security issues on your
systems, it's only an illusion. And Ars Technica
(http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20070528-germany-adopts-anti-hacker-law-critics-say-it-breeds-insecurity.html)
quotes a Chaos Club spokesman as saying that legitimate research can now
only take place in a "legal gray area."
The Keyboard Samurais
(http://keyboardsamurais.de/2007/07/06/german-law-criminalizes-programmers-admins/)
blog suggests that doing a penetration test on one's network will now
lead to prison time, and interestingly, points out that the German
authority for IT security itself, the BSI, promotes the BOSS CD, which
contains some of the very hacking programs that are being outlawed.
http://security.itworld.com/4341/nlsblog070814/page_1.html
Dan Blacharski has authored several books on technology, finance, and
business and entrepreneurial concepts. He has been a freelance writer
and editorial consultant for over 15 years and currently covers high-
tech topics for the trade press. He and his wife enjoy spending time
restoring his 1888 Victorian home, and spends winters in Bangkok.
Write him at mailto:dan@blacharski.net.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission of Computerworld Inc. is prohibited. Computerworld and Computerworld.com and the respective logos are trademarks of International Data Group Inc.