Putting the "P" and "C" Back in Effective Meetings, Part 1
Having good, effective meetings is a tricky business these days. Having
them is more than just having a meaningful agenda and sticking to the
time allotments for the discussion items. There are also many modes of
having meetings. It's important to decide which one is the right one for
the right situation.
With the increased demands of time on schedules, need to be in several
places, global associations, and ease of access through online
communication channels, it's easy to loose sight of a few of the
beneficial elements of in-person meetings. The barrage of email
exchanges coupled with instant messaging and online chat are starting to
depersonalize and fragment the teams you've been so painstakingly
building and inter-department relationships you've been nurturing. We're
starting to lose the "P" and "C" inherent in meetings, such as:
* People
* Peers
* Personal
* Professional
* Processes
and
* Communication
* Collaboration
* Cooperation
* Colleague
* Constructive competition (through stimulation)
Tone of voice, inflection, facial clues, body language are not part of
online interactions. And the lack of personal contact dehumanizes the
speaker. Misinterpretations of the words can easily be made so that a
simple statement of fact gets construed as a boast or confrontation. A
delay in response gets interpreted as apathy instead of a call to
resolve an emergency.
It's not only important that you have your people meet at regular
intervals to touch base on what's going on. It's important to use as
many of your possible meeting modes effectively so that you contain
costs while still building those essentials to managing your department
- developing good communication, collaboration, get feedback, and have a
dedicated period of time when all of this occurs.
There are at least four modes of having meetings that we'll discuss in
this three-part series: in-person and voice meetings, web conferences,
and video conferences. These are in addition to chat meetings. One of
the downsides of chat is that you're still dealing with a voiceless,
formless audience that has little sense of the real person on the other
side of the monitor.
Read more about opinion in ITworld's Opinion section
» posted by ITworld staff
ITworld
Sign up for ITworld's Daily newsletter
Follow ITworld on Twitter @IT_world
Brian Proffitt
Microsoft/Novell: Breaking Down the Coupon Numbers
Esther Schindler
Drupal's Dries Buytaert on Building the Next Drupal
Tom Henderson
Top Ten General Operating Systems Rants
pasmith
PS3 motion controller delayed; goes up against Project Natal
sjvn
Neolithic Windows security hole alive and well in Windows 7
claird
Perl source code comparison makes for good reading
mikelgan
Cell phones don't create stress or interrupt much
Sandra Henry-Stocker
How to: The Unix Interview
Where Google Chrome security fails: the password
I heard mention that the Chrome OS will have some sort of encryption available a la bitlocker. If it's possible to encrypt personal data using another password or key, then it may have potential for very secure data.... And Ubuntu has an 'encrypt home directory' option, perhaps google should follow suit.
- Dann
Join the conversation here
Quick, practical advice for IT pros. Made fresh daily.
- Ubuntu advances: Why Ubuntu server installations will surge in 2010
- Social media marketing: How to make friends with benefits
- More...
Want to cash in on your IT savvy? Send your tip to tips@itworld.com. If we post it, we'll send you a $25 Amazon e-gift card.






