Putting the "P" and "C" Back in Effective Meetings, Part 1

June 16, 2002, 11:00 PM —  ITworld — 

Having good, effective meetings is a tricky business these days. Having
them is more than just having a meaningful agenda and sticking to the
time allotments for the discussion items. There are also many modes of
having meetings. It's important to decide which one is the right one for
the right situation.

With the increased demands of time on schedules, need to be in several
places, global associations, and ease of access through online
communication channels, it's easy to loose sight of a few of the
beneficial elements of in-person meetings. The barrage of email
exchanges coupled with instant messaging and online chat are starting to
depersonalize and fragment the teams you've been so painstakingly
building and inter-department relationships you've been nurturing. We're
starting to lose the "P" and "C" inherent in meetings, such as:

* People
* Peers
* Personal
* Professional
* Processes

and

* Communication
* Collaboration
* Cooperation
* Colleague
* Constructive competition (through stimulation)

Tone of voice, inflection, facial clues, body language are not part of
online interactions. And the lack of personal contact dehumanizes the
speaker. Misinterpretations of the words can easily be made so that a
simple statement of fact gets construed as a boast or confrontation. A
delay in response gets interpreted as apathy instead of a call to
resolve an emergency.

It's not only important that you have your people meet at regular
intervals to touch base on what's going on. It's important to use as
many of your possible meeting modes effectively so that you contain
costs while still building those essentials to managing your department
- developing good communication, collaboration, get feedback, and have a
dedicated period of time when all of this occurs.

There are at least four modes of having meetings that we'll discuss in
this three-part series: in-person and voice meetings, web conferences,
and video conferences. These are in addition to chat meetings. One of
the downsides of chat is that you're still dealing with a voiceless,
formless audience that has little sense of the real person on the other
side of the monitor.

Read more about opinion in ITworld's Opinion section

» posted by ITworld staff

ITworld

Sign up for ITworld's Daily newsletter
Follow ITworld on Twitter @IT_world

I like it!
Post a comment
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
peer-to-peer

Brian Proffitt
Microsoft/Novell: Breaking Down the Coupon Numbers

Esther Schindler
Drupal's Dries Buytaert on Building the Next Drupal

Tom Henderson
Top Ten General Operating Systems Rants

pasmith
PS3 motion controller delayed; goes up against Project Natal

sjvn
Neolithic Windows security hole alive and well in Windows 7

claird
Perl source code comparison makes for good reading

mikelgan
Cell phones don't create stress or interrupt much

Sandra Henry-Stocker
How to: The Unix Interview

 

Where Google Chrome security fails: the password
I heard mention that the Chrome OS will have some sort of encryption available a la bitlocker. If it's possible to encrypt personal data using another password or key, then it may have potential for very secure data.... And Ubuntu has an 'encrypt home directory' option, perhaps google should follow suit.
- Dann

Join the conversation here

The Daily Tip

The Daily TipQuick, practical advice for IT pros. Made fresh daily.

Hot tips:

Want to cash in on your IT savvy? Send your tip to tips@itworld.com. If we post it, we'll send you a $25 Amazon e-gift card.

Newsletters

Subscribe to ITWORLD TODAY and receive the latest IT news and analysis.

I would like to receive offers via email from ITworld partners.
By clicking submit you agree to the terms and conditions outlined in ITworld's privacy policy.
Marketplace