ITworld.com
  Search  
 Home  Newsletter Archive  XML IN PRACTICE
XML Namespaces
Sign up for XML IN PRACTICE
More Newsletters
 

XML IN PRACTICE --- 04/11/2002



Chaos Theory tells us that the mere flapping of a butterfly's wings in a South American rain forest can cause hurricanes on the other side of the world. Believing this makes it hard not to be awestruck. After all, a butterfly is a small and beautiful creature. How could something so harmless looking be the root cause of significant and detrimental events on a global scale?

The XML world has its own chaos theory-enabled butterfly known as the "Namespaces in XML" W3C Recommendation from 1999. Weighing in at a mere 15 pages, the namespaces Rec is certainly small, though opinions differ on its beauty. Aesthetics aside, its ability to wreak havoc on a global scale in the XML world is beyond doubt.

Ostensibly, the namespace Rec is just a simple way of allowing element type names to be globally unique. Unfortunately, in so doing, it introduces rules for defaulting namespaces that significantly complicates any software it touches. XPath, SAX, DOM, XQuery, XSchema, and XSLT -- all of these are caught up in the flapping of the namespace Rec's wings, and it is not a pretty sight! I won't go into the details here, but type any of the previous words into a search engine along with "namespace" and "problem" and you will see what I mean.

Recently, the W3C introduced a draft of version 1.1 of the namespace Rec. The changes suggested are minor but have caused the namespace debate to erupt again on xml-dev (http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml- dev/200204/threads.html). Joe English, who is one of the most knowledgeable people about markup technology on the planet, was moved to post a plea for sanity that is well worth reading (http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/200204/msg00170.html).

When someone as knowledgeable as Joe English starts classifying compliant namespace usage patterns into categories called "neurotic", "borderline", and "psychotic", it behooves us to take a step back and look at what is going on here! When the XML world revisits its fundamentals (around 2008 I suspect as these things always take a decade), namespaces will need to have their wings well and truly clipped in order to redress some of the chaos and damage caused from a decade of inconsiderate flapping.

My advice: Don't use namespaces at all if you can avoid it. If you can't, then only put them on the root element. Oh, and don't lend money to anyone who tries to tell you namespaces are simple.

 



www.itworld.com    open.itworld.com     security.itworld.com     smallbusiness.itworld.com
storage.itworld.com     utilitycomputing.itworld.com     wireless.itworld.com

 
Contact Us   About Us   Privacy Policy    Terms of Service   Reprints  

CIO   Computerworld   CSO   GamePro   Games.net   Industry Standard   Infoworld   ITworld  
JavaWorld   LinuxWorld  MacUser   Macworld   Network World   PC World   Playlist  

DEMO   IDG Connect   IDG Knowledge Hub   IDG TechNetwork   IDG World Expo  

Copyright © Computerworld, Inc. All rights reserved

Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission of Computerworld Inc. is prohibited. Computerworld and Computerworld.com and the respective logos are trademarks of International Data Group Inc.