Does data centre co-location still make sense for a SMB, or is it time to just go directly for the cloud?

hughye

In many ways, both are providing the same service. We have co-located our data centre for quite a while, and in general found it to be effective way of controlling cost, both in personnel and equipment. I can't shake the feeling though that we are simply making an interim stop on the way to the Cloud, which would also enable us to gain flexibility, which is a growing concern as we, er, grow. For the end user, is there a significant difference in the experience between cloud services and co-location?

Answer this Question

Answers

5 total
jimlynch
Vote Up (7)

I doubt end users really care either way.

It really depends on the needs of the company though as to which way makes the most sense. It's probably a good idea for a company to sit down and come up with a report or plan that analyzes the financial costs of each option. Once that's done, it will probably be much easier to decide on a long term course, and then begin working on implementing that.

As always, it takes time and careful planning before being able to achieve the right decision.

blackdog
Vote Up (7)

Both are going to offer some of the same advantages.  There is usually going to be a cost savings compared to building your own data room or data center either with co-location or a cloud provider.

 

Off the top of my head, one of the advantages that come to mind for co-location is (generally) more available tech support, which can be particularly helpful for smaller businesses.  The main thing that it offers over a cloud provider is that you are still on your own dedicated servers, since you typically lease cabinets, rack units, etc from the data center.  With the cloud, this is not necessarily so, you are sharing resources in a different way.  Even so, most cloud providers make a serious effort to maintain security, and you data is probably as safe or safer than it would be in-house.  An additional advantage of the cloud is that it is readily scalable in a way that data centers are not.  Data centers are kind of a pre-cloud thing to me, I would rather use a cloud provider, but be very picky in choosing the right one. 

sandeepseeram
Vote Up (7)

Co location: Typically a data center where you have your own servers using their bandwidth and you lease space.

Cloud: you can scale up or down as needed and is setup in a cluster of servers so this can happen and so that if your site goes down your still up because it moved to a different server.

Cloud can be set up in a colocation data center though.

 

Sandeep Seeram

sandeepseeram
Vote Up (6)

So in other words cloud is better for the most part.. Well as you stated above it can be used at a co-location center. So Just having co-location hosting with cloud is a better idea.

I think my new host has cloud, but I find it slow still.

Sandeep Seeram

jimlynch
Vote Up (3)

I doubt end users really care either way.

It really depends on the needs of the company though as to which way makes the most sense. It's probably a good idea for a company to sit down and come up with a report or plan that analyzes the financial costs of each option. Once that's done, it will probably be much easier to decide on a long term course, and then begin working on implementing that.

As always, it takes time and careful planning before being able to achieve the right decision.

Ask a question

Join Now or Sign In to ask a question.
Internet tools are just starting to be applied to industrial tasks such as maintaining equipment and optimizing operations, but the wealth of data being produced by industrial systems could make this a major focus of development in the coming years.
Microsoft is upping the stakes in the growing market for cloud-based ERP, with its Dynamics GP 2013 and NAV 2013 products now available for deployment on its Azure service.
Walmart has begun selling the Chromebook in 2,800 of its approximately 4,600 U.S. stores, expanding the reach of this still-on-the-margins platform. Staples too.
The threat of tornadoes in Oklahoma is real, but the data centers in that state are ready.
With over 80% of companies now claiming to use some form of cloud solution, best practices and lessons learned abound.
Red Hat made its first $1 billion commercializing Linux. Now, it hopes to make even more doing the same for OpenStack.
European cloud providers think the U.S. spy scandal will result in more enterprises choosing local alternatives over the likes of Amazon Web Services and Rackspace, which, on the other hand, are adamant that they aren't taking part in programs such as Prism.
Thanks to the NSA, you can’t be too careful these days
Red Hat announced a large-scale restructuring of its OpenStack-based offerings today, bundling its Enterprise Linux software with the OpenStack platform, and creating a more comprehensive infrastructure product for private-cloud IaaS.
You can buy pretty much anything in IT today "as a service," and now it's come to this: 2011 startup company named Metacloud claims to be one of the first to offer a cloud-based service of cloud computing resources.