Sorry, I still don't think the Kindle makes sense

 Personal Tech, Amazon, e-books 19 comments

In a report that surprises me a bit, Time Magazine is reporting that the Amazon Kindle has been a relative success so far and represents a fairly sizable portion of all book sales.

“On a title-by-title basis, of the 130,000 titles available on Kindle and in physical form, Kindle sales now make up over 12 percent of sales for those titles...At a technology trade conference in May, CEO Jeff Bezos said that Kindle sales accounted for 6 percent of book titles sold for the Kindle and in print. So Amazon appears to be selling more e-books,” the publication reported.

After reading through the report, I can’t help but wonder why Amazon is enjoying such success with the Kindle. Ostensibly, people are finding reason to buy a $360 device that allows you to read books, newspapers, and Wikipedia entries, but is it really necessary to pay that much for a device that lets you do exactly what your eyes do anyway?

I don’t get it.

Some people like to say that e-books are great because you can carry an entire library of books with you wherever you go, but that argument is ridiculous. Not only can you read just one book at a time, but how many people really need to carry thousands of books with them at all times?

Now, I’m not saying that e-books like the Kindle don’t offer any value, but I don’t see how anyone can justify spending that much money on a product that does so little.

Think of it this way: instead of buying the Kindle, you can head down to your local Barnes & Noble or surf over to Amazon.com and buy about 18 books for the price of the Kindle itself. And considering new releases will set you back another $10 per book, those same 18 books will add an additional $180 to the cost of entry. So when it’s all said and done, you’ll be paying $540 for the same result.

If you’re really into saving money, consider the fact that you can head down to your local library and loan all 18 of those books for the low, low cost of nothing.

That really puts the Kindle into perspective, doesn’t it?

The way I see it, the Kindle will provide the greatest benefit to college students who need to lug expensive textbooks around campus all year. But so far, the number of textbooks on the Kindle is practically zero and there’s no indication that textbook companies are willing to jump on the e-book bandwagon anytime soon.

At $360, the Amazon Kindle strikes me as a serious waste of money. If Amazon really wants to create a compelling product and reach critical mass, it needs to subsidize the cost of the Kindle and make it up on the books.

Then again, if it’s already coaxing suckers into buying this thing, maybe it doesn’t have to do anything.

Call me when the Kindle is free and I only need to buy the books. At that point, I’ll know e-books have arrived and the print business is in trouble. Until then, it’s nothing more than a niche product with a suspect future.

19 comments

    Anonymous 2 years ago
    I don't have a Kindle. I'd like one but I do agree with you that it's a bit pricey. The screen incorporates some pretty interesting technology - that might be driving the cost up a bit right now.But you're kind of missing the point that when it comes to consumer products your opinion on whether something makes sense or not is not so relevant (other than to motivate your personal buying behavior). Either it fills a need or it doesn't. The market will decide. If a product is a market success then somewhat by definition it "makes sense".--Chris
    Anonymous 3 years ago
    I think it is great idea going in the right direction. The next step would be to just make the titles availible to folks with pda's and smartphones. I love to read, but I don;t want to lug around a bunch of books everywhere I go. I am also a web developer and it would be great to have an electronic copy of the different reference books that i have on my phone (a Treo) so that I could easily refer to them and cheaply replace them (I would assume that costs would go down on a book since paper, printing, and binding costs are no longer a factor). I could also see this as a huge boon to college students. I remember my college days where I lugged around 100 lbs of books all day. Books that cost over $100, sometimes $200 and you were able to sell them back for 14 of that. An electronic format would be cheaper to publish, plus it could be updated with new editions at a cheaper rate to all concerned. Imagine a being a doctor and the costs of getting new PDR every year. With this, you could update the necessary parts as they change or get revised. I have seen similar devices in Borders and other books stores and have contemplated getting one. At $364, the price is a bit steep and I do agree that they should come up with a special program for college students and those who cannot afford it. I am not sure I would spend that much on a separate device at this point...but then again, a full set of ColdFusion books would cost me just about as much and I am due to get the latest version (version 8) reference set...I think this is a great idea. I think maybe you just aren't seeing the big picture on this.Eric
    Anonymous 3 years ago
    There are several reasons why Kindle is superior to the physical book format.1. You do not have to have a massive storage area for books that you loved, want to keep, and want to re-read.2. Reference3. Time spent going to and from library, stores, etc.4. Ease of access. If you are out, you can still read during those unexpected wait periods during the day. You can download with ease.5. Ease of sharing.6. Conservation of eco-resources.And the last, very personal reason, you bring no allergens or diseases into your home. I am a book lover. I have read everything available for my entire life, including labels, etc. when nothing else is available. For any reader with an immune disorder, Kindle fills a much needed spot.
    Anonymous 3 years ago
    I have a few comments to share. One, folks who've never seen a Kindle do have a right to bash it, but honestly I don't put too much weight to the opinions of those folks. There's the key part of free speech there; so go ahead and bash or gush if you like. The rest of us can decide for ourselves to ignore you or not. Anyway, I am thinking of buying one. Here are my reasons. One, I read a lot of books each year. Two, I buy many books from a Sci-Fi publisher who already puts their books out in DRM-Free formats. Three, I read lots of books over and over again. Wierd, yes, but that's me. Currently, I have over 50 paperbacks that are worn out from being read only 3 or 4 times. Time seems to be heavily impacting the paper and the bindings. Four, I am a programmer who loves the prospect of the O'Reilly books coming out on the Kindle for the same reasons another commenter used. To sum up my point here, E-books do make sense for some folks; which may soon include me, and it's a shame to me that some people think that people aren't entitled to their opinions.
    Anonymous 3 years ago
    The green issue is a big factor. I'm thinking of getting a Kindle primarily for the newspaper subscriptions - the New York Times, Washington Post and Wall Street Journal. I and others will save many trees by using the Kindle for newspapers. Also the Kindle newspaper subscriptions are cheaper than the paper subscriptions, and will pay for the Kindle over time.
    Anonymous 3 years ago
    I guess I'm one of those "suckers" who bought a Kindle and guess what I'm still glad i did. I use it every day to read a number of books at any one time. I used to carry three to four books around with me but now i have hundreds in one device. I can even keyword search through newspapers, blogs, magazines, and books. I can print out highlighted notes onto a few pages for quick reference. My advice, don't do a review on technology without first using it yourself. You only look uniformed and petty.
    Anonymous 3 years ago
    I don't own a Kindle, and I will express my negative opinion of it, in spite of the fact that the Kindle owners here seem to be infuriated that anyone would dare do such a thing. I don't have to own a Kindle in order to criticize it. Why? Because I possess a functioning brain. Why would I want to buy a Kindle and then pay for books that are crippled with DRM? These books can only be read on a Kindle. Not a computer screen, nor another ereader. This means that the consumer is locked into the Kindle indefinitely. If you ever purchase another ebook reader, your ebooks are unreadable. If Amazon ever stops manufacturing this device, your ebooks are unreadable. So, you've wasted all the money you've spent on your Kindle ebooks.Meanwhile, bound books are DRM free. You can read them anywhere and at any time. You can sell them, loan them out, and basically do whatever you want with them. Kindle ebook purchases are basically just rentals, due to the ridiculous DRM. This is also why I will not purchase DRM'd music downloads. I don't like throwing my money away. If Amazon ever removes the DRM from the Kindle ebooks, I will happily buy one. Until that day arrives, forget it.The Kindle is a foolish purchase, and only a sucker would buy one.
    Anonymous 3 years ago
    I love my Kindle. My subscription to the Wall Street Journal is half what the paper version was -- and I'm not wasting trees or the jet fuel to get it to me.A library? You can't be serious. Any recent book will be checked out or reserved for months.News magazines, newspapers, frequent travelers, and bestseller readers would all benefit -- cheaper, faster, and more convenient than the paper versions. If you're into: used books, materials with a lot of pictures/diagrams, selling books that you bought, and you don't travel then it probably wouldn't make sense.
    Anonymous 3 years ago
    I have one, and it's revolutionized my reading habits. I have 4-5 books I'm reading on at the same time and a long line of free samples to consider for the future. I'm also reading more up to date stuff, as a new best seller costs the same as an old bargain book. Great for travel or any other time. Well worth the initial investment.
    Anonymous 3 years ago
    Have you heard about gasoline prices? A trip to the local bookstore would cost me about $12.00 just to get there and back - more than the cost of one Kindle best seller.....and, not all Kindle books cost $10.00. Take a look at their catalog. The library - again, there's that pesky cost of transportation plus the fact that if it's a best seller I want, I have to reserve it and wait my turn. What about the growing portion of the population who are too old to drive? Many of them are able to do little BUT read.A person may not need to carry around hundreds of books in their Kindle, but then they no longer need shelf space to store them....and this can be a big consideration for the serious reader.I may be the only person on the planet who doesn't 'get' the I-Pod (who wants to listen to music all the time), but I sure do 'get' the Kindle. Isn't it great that we don't all think alike!
    Anonymous 3 years ago
    Don, perhaps you can only read one book at a time but I'm usually reading 3 - 4 at any given time the genre depending on the mood I'm in. For me, when I travel the Kindle makes perfect sense.
    Anonymous 3 years ago
    I don't have a Kindle, but after my 13 hour flight to and from Asia and three weeks of lugging around the same two (heavy)books...I would definitely invest in a Kindle. And I'm sure if more textbooks were published through Kindle, college students would be all over it. Textbooks and manuals can get pretty heavy.
    Anonymous 3 years ago
    I can think of a great reason to have a kindle. I can read a Harry potter book in about 8 hours. If I'm on a trip and spending time on trains, subways, or any kind of public transit, a kindle weighs a fraction of even a paperback book. So not only can I carry enough books to last me more than a weeks vacation but now, with the airlines charging you for extra carry-ons and luggage, I can pack a kindle full of books and still only carry a purse. Plus, save the trees, man. Not that I don't like books in paper format, but it's certainly eco-friendly.
    Anonymous 3 years ago
    No, you obviously don't get it. I have owned my Kindle for about 2 weeks. I love it because it's technology. I love it because it's easy. I love it expressly because I don't have to make trips to the library. I don't care about $360.My Kindle currently has 3 new books loaded on it. Edward Sawtelle, In Defense of Food and David Sedaris' latest work. I've got Malcom Gladwell's two books in audio format, which I listen to during my daily commute. I have the Tree Hugger blog, which I review at least twice daily and I uploaded my daily scripture text & weekly Bible reading. It also has hundreds of pages of requirements documents I need to review for work, my annotations and links to my Email and other web sites of importance to me. It as my dictionary, my clock and my companion when I'm bored.If you don't own one, you have no right to critique it. If you owned one, you wouldn't have been so harsh. Look, if you're a cheapskate and don't want to spend the money, then fine. But don't bitch about a product you neither own nor want. In my opinion, you're not qualified.
    Anonymous 1 year ago in reply to Anonymous
    Danny, if "Kindle" is your constant companion, I pity you! You must lead a very lonely life. May I suggest a blow up doll. Maybe you can read to her or him using your Kindle! LOL!!!!
    Anonymous 3 years ago in reply to Anonymous
    I agree with this comment totally. I've pretty much read all blogs on the Kindle, which I received last Dec. 4th, and absolutely every one of the negative comments came from people who do not own one, probably have never touched or even seen one in person, and who certainly will never buy one. But many of these do eventually get their hands on one -- buying or borrowing one, after which they quickly become dedicated supporters of the Kindle. And then they refresh their earlier comments, making a full turn into the supporters column. They usually say that the just didn't understand the value of it earlier, but they do now.I don't know where people get off bad mouthing things about which they really know nothing. Do they just want to hear themselves in print? Frankly, that's really dumb. But I think in most cases it is just their ego speaking -- trying to convince everybody how smart they are. Well, they are NOT. I have an 9 GB memory card in my Kindle, which I calculate will enable it to hold 15,000 books -- way too many for me. But I do have about 740 already, including many many out of copyright and of course out of print books which I read as an English Lit major in college long ago, and never had hopes of ever owning as they are otherwise unavailable. And these were free! Makes my Kindle very very cheap, and I paid $400.00 for it. And my Kindle goes where I go -- I am never without it in the hopes of finding a few free minutes out of my busy life to do what I love to do most -- read. I've been doing it ever since I can remember after my sister taught me to read before I was school age. And I'm now 82 years old.
    Anonymous 3 years ago
    King Gillette would be astounded. $359 for the razor and $10 each for the blades. Kindle holds 200 titles? That's $359 plus 2 Grand! Best deal since 10,000 songs on an iPod @ $.99.Kudos to Bezos & co. if this becomes a great success.I bought a Rocket eBook reader almost 10 years ago, thinking to support Field Sales Managers with sales and tech data. NYT bestsellers and lots of Public Domain were available - not so easy getting updated company info into it. I still have it though (somewhere), love the idea but not the results. Kindle is a better, smaller, smarter, more able successor, but I think I'll be a late adopter, this time.
    Anonymous 3 years ago in reply to Anonymous
    Can you extend the same theory to Blu-Ray? Sell the Players for cheap/free and sell the disks really pricey? What BS!Do Gillette have 100,000 free public domain blades? So much for your book/blade comparison?And finally, do Gillette allow you to convert your knives/blades at home or provide a 10 cent (or free) conversion service?LCD screen (Rocket eBook) and eInk (Kindle) are different technologies and you can appreciate the latter only after you use them.
    Anonymous 3 years ago
    I can think of a real good reason to have an entire library in one device: reference. I'm a programmer. I have tons of very unwieldy manuals that would be much more useful in one device with electronic search capabilities. I honestly don't know how many, if any, programming texts are available for the Kindle. But programming isn't the only field that requires tons of manuals. I easily have over 10000 pages of such material. Kindle's potential to be the ultimate reference library makes it worth the cost to me if a large quantity of the books I use all the time become available for it. If O'reilly media converts all of its books to kindle format I'd pay twice what it costs now to get one. Add the ability to download code corrections for each book and current issues of programming magazines and I'd be in heaven.

      Add a comment

      Post a comment using one of these accounts
      Or join now
      At least 6 characters

      Note: Comment will appear soon after you have activated your account.
      Obscene/spam comments will be removed and accounts suspended.
      The information you submit is subject to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

      ITworld LIVE

      Ask a question

      Ask a Question