In-flight cell call ban advances in Congress

By Stephen Lawson, IDG News Service |  Government, legislation 16 comments

A bill that would stifle in-flight cellular calls despite emerging technologies that finally make them feasible is headed for the U.S. House of Representatives.

The proposed Halting Airplane Noise to Give Us Peace (HANG UP) Act was approved by the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee on a voice vote Thursday. It would make permanent the long-standing ban on such calls by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and Federal Communications Commission. The next stop for the bill will be the full House, after which companion legislation would also have to be passed by the Senate and signed by President George W. Bush. A companion measure has been introduced as part of an FAA reauthorization measure in the Senate.

Cellular calls in flight have long been illegal because of concerns about interference with both aviation systems on board and cellular networks on the ground. But some regions of the world are now moving ahead with in-flight calling systems. Earlier this year, Emirates Airline began offering an in-flight cellular service, and the European Union recently opened the door for countries to hand out licenses for offering such services.

But Representative Peter DeFazio, a Democrat from Oregon who co-sponsored the HANG UP Act, is worried about a creep toward in-flight calls over the U.S.

"Polls show the public overwhelmingly doesn't want to be subjected to people talking on their cell phones on increasingly over-packed airplanes. However, with Internet access just around the corner on U.S. flights, it won't be long before the ban on voice communications on in-flight planes is lifted," DeFazio said in a statement. Cash-strapped airlines could end up charging some passengers to use their phones while charging others to sit in a phone-free section of the plane, he said.

American Airlines recently carried out a soft launch of a Wi-Fi in-flight broadband service from Aircell called Gogo, and Virgin America plans to offer the same service by the end of this year. American said it doesn't plan to allow voice calls over Gogo and that Aircell will use technical means to prevent them.

The bill, designated H.R. 5788, wouldn't ban Internet access, e-mail or text-messaging.

In a Harris Interactive survey earlier this year commissioned by Yahoo's Connected Life Americas division, 74 percent of respondents said cell phone use on airplanes should be restricted to silent features. There were 2,088 adults in the U.S. surveyed.

16 comments

    Anonymous 3 years ago
    It is now official, our government is retarded. The housing market is crashing, we have nukes in Iran and the Iraqis are kicking us out of their country (which is just sooooo ironic and funny) and our lame politicians are worried about cellphone noise on a plane? This they make a law for? What happens if I use my phone? Do they make an emergency landing and call in the fun police? If it is a problem and customers hate it then they should speak up to the airlines and the airlines can make a business decision. Do I want a cellphone crowd on my plane or a non-cellphone crowd. Kind of like no-smoking sections at restaurants (in the few states left where smoking is still legal. BTW I am a non smoker). This is a waste of time and just goes to show just how damn stupid or government is.
    Anonymous 3 years ago
    So, it bans "voice communication?"
    Anonymous 3 years ago
    Well said, Alex. Let the airlines decide if they want to allow cell use, and people can decide if they want to fly an airline that allows them to talk or one that allows them peace and quiet on their flight. This seems like something to distract people from the fact that nothing useful is being done in Congress.
    Anonymous 3 years ago
    I am so glad that Congress is tackling this extremely serious issue before they left on vacation for a couple months, instead of trivial things like the poor economy, the massive budget deficit, high energy/fuel costs, the Middle East, etc.
    Anonymous 3 years ago
    Peter DeFazio is also the same old man that is constantly yelling at those darn kids to get off his lawn too.
    Anonymous 3 years ago
    It's called skype.Or AIMor MSNall these have voice technology.
    Anonymous 3 years ago in reply to Anonymous
    read the second to the last paragraph again. "American said it doesn't plan to allow voice calls over Gogo and that Aircell will use technical means to prevent them." i take it to mean that they will block communication over whatever the normal ports are for the voicechat parts of those programs are.
    Anonymous 3 years ago
    I'm not sure I understand how anyone can be for restricting freedom when the only harm is annoyance. Freedom to talk is a right. Freedom from annoyance isn't.An airline could make the choice to restrict talking on phones on their planes, but we really shouldn't want the government to place any restrictions on speech. That's just scary.
    Anonymous 3 years ago in reply to Anonymous
    Yup. You're right. Say Neal, you like the movies? Me too. Let me know next time you're going so I can sit behind you and make some cell phone calls. Yes, yes, of course a movie theater is somewhat different and it's not a perfect metaphor. What about town noise ordinances? If I have a right to free speech, shouldn't it be anytime / anywhere?But an airplane is worse. You're essentially trapped for hours. Worse, there may be plenty of people who can't quite afford first class, but still have some class. And those folks, often frequent business travelers, will be stuck next to the barely-made-it-on-the-plane-due-to-drunken-behavior moron who'd definitely going to be yelling "Can you hear my fat ass now," for two hours.Tell you what, let's pass the law and we'll make two exceptions. Family emergencies and some profoundly important political speech that just can't wait 'till the plane lands.So you see Neal, I DO want the government to place some restrictions on speech. (And please, spare me any slippery slope arguments. Wayyyy tired.)Scott
    Anonymous 3 years ago in reply to Anonymous
    Leaving aside the rather juvenile me-me sentiment of your first paragraph, if you read the report you'll see that they don't want to limit your free speech (which refers to communication over any media) but rather the noise you make when your lips start flapping.

      Add a comment

      Post a comment using one of these accounts
      Or join now
      At least 6 characters

      Note: Comment will appear soon after you have activated your account.
      Obscene/spam comments will be removed and accounts suspended.
      The information you submit is subject to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

      ITworld LIVE

      Ask a question

      Ask a Question