Windows 7: The Linux killer

By Preston Gralla, Computerworld |  Windows, Linux, netbook 10 comments

Microsoft has long been worried about Linux competition in the server market. When it came to ordinary PCs and laptops, however, it knew it had little to fear.

But that was then. Now Microsoft may fear Linux on the desktop as much as it does the Mac. It's finally taking Linux seriously as a desktop operating system, and it has designed Windows 7 to kill it.

Let me explain.

The threat to Windows comes entirely from "netbooks" -- lightweight, inexpensive laptops that typically use Intel 's low-powered Atom processor and don't come with substantial amounts of RAM or powerful graphics processors. They're designed mainly for browsing the Web, handling e-mail, writing memos, and taking care of simple word-processing or spreadsheet chores.

Netbooks will account for about a third of all PC growth this year, according to Citigroup . Shipments will rise at an annual average rate of 60% to reach 29 million netbooks in 2010, compared with 18% growth for standard notebooks, says a September BNP Paribas report.

Clearly, the future is in netbooks. And that has Microsoft worried. Netbooks can't handle Vista's hardware demands, so XP is the only Microsoft operating system that runs on them. But Linux is ideally suited for lower-powered netbooks.

The result? Acer and Asustek, which account for 90% of the netbook market, are using Linux on about 30% of their low-cost notebooks, according to Bloomberg. Making matters worse, if Linux is used on those netbooks, it means that Microsoft Office isn't. So Microsoft takes a double hit every time someone buys a Linux netbook.

Microsoft isn't just worried about ceding 30% of the netbook market to Linux. It's also worried that if people get used to running Linux on netbooks, they'll consider buying Linux on desktop PCs as well. Here's what Dickie Chang, an analyst at IDC in Taipei, told Bloomberg: "It's a real threat to Microsoft. It gives users a chance to see and try something new, showing them there is an alternative."

Microsoft, though, has a not-so-secret weapon against Linux: Windows 7. Its new operating system, slated to be introduced sometime next year, is designed to work fine on netbooks. In fact, at Microsoft's recent Professional Developers Conference, where the pre-beta of Windows 7 was unveiled, Windows Senior Vice President Steve Sinofsky showed off Windows 7 on his Lenovo S10 and said it used less than half of the netbook's 1GB of RAM.

When Windows 7 ships, expect a massive marketing blitz pushing it on netbooks with special deals, and netbook hardware taking advantage of Windows 7 capabilities, including touch screens.

In fact, the blitz has already begun. Asus CEO Jerry Shen announced that he plans to release versions of the Eee PC powered by Windows 7 in mid-2009, including a touch-screen version.

This is anything but a level playing field. Because no company owns Linux, there won't be a competing marketing push for Linux netbooks. Microsoft has shown before how tough it can be on competitors -- remember Lotus 1-2-3, WordPerfect and Harvard Graphics? So expect Linux netbook sales to fall when Windows 7 ships.

Despite Microsoft's killer instincts, I don't think Linux netbook sales will stop dead. There will always be a niche for them. But within a year of the Windows 7 launch, Linux market share will drop. The high point for Linux netbook sales will be from now until the launch of Windows 7. After that will come the inevitable decline.

Preston Gralla is a contributing editor for Computerworld.com and the author of more than 35 books, including How the Internet Works (Que, 2006).

10 comments

    Anonymous 2 years ago
    Stop telling users to use command-line fixes and such.Tailor a distribution that hides errors behind stupid dialog boxes, and tell the users to send it in for repairs (I know a place, it's my workplace, ka-ching!)...Hey, it works for Microsoft! Besides, you can't expect regular computer users -- especially among us, the American public, many of whom are quite proud of their ignorance and "non-nerdiness" -- to even TRY.That's what you're getting wrong, Linuxites. Linux on the desktop has to keep it all away from users, not tell them what's happening. Even if it's broken, they just don't give a crap.
    Anonymous 3 years ago
    I agree that Windows or Mac is easier for the normal user. I got Ubuntu recently with no prior knowledge to try. Both my wireless card and my sound card are unsupported out of the box. Know what that leaves me with? A weirdly shaped paperweight. Windows and Mac are supported by the hardware, end of story.Now I know there are workarounds, but if you visit the forums (the only available help) the only solutions you will find are command line. On a Windows or Mac, the hardest thing you have to do is maybe insert a CD and click NEXT a few times.Just my $0.02
    Anonymous 3 years ago
    It is a misconception that Linux requires the knowledge of command line. There is a graphic front end for most everything the average person does. I have worked with the average user for many years and I tell you when something goes wrong on a windows pc the average user is just as lost as they would be if they were using linux. And I have used linux for years and never once have I had to compile anything that I didn't want to and I know of no one who compiles their kernel, just the number geeks, and if they could they would do the same with windows.
    Anonymous 3 years ago
    What's so easy about windows?Third party system utility suites will always have a market in MS users.Anyone who thinks Linux is hard must be thinking of Linux as it was at the end of Last Century. apt-get update brain.*Let's face it, Synaptek, KDE and Gnome utilities, and the tools offered by specific distros are simpler or at least as simple as the M$ offerings. I've 3 techno-idiot friends that I built computers for. They ran linux no problem that they would not have had on any other OS (win or mac). They did web stuff, email, camera, printer, scanner, music etc. no problem - NO COMMAND LINE. Linux help systems are actually pretty useful.~steve~Linux rox!Konqueror is King!Mepis is simply the best.KDE for me please.
    Anonymous 3 years ago
    Well I do think that many Linux distributions are stronger than Microsoft. The problem is though with Linux if you run into a problem the average consumer would be stumped. By that I mean they have to find the distributions website and look into the forums for support, know how to type commands and all sorts of things most people don't even want to have to hassle with. Make Linux easier for end users to troubleshoot without having to do command line repairs, or compiling kernels and it good.
    Anonymous 3 years ago in reply to Anonymous
    That is a General rule, USERS USE the PC, Problems need to be fixed by Technicians, When M$ put the user to SetUP problems happend (virus, malware, datalose, etc)
    Anonymous 3 years ago
    Linux geeks need to get past the fact that Windows is what people know and will gravitate to, whether or not it is a "superior" OS or not. Linux is, in a friends' words, "scary" because it's unknown, and people don't have time to learn an unknown OS, whether or not it's supported by the PC manufacturer or a bunch of geeks on a website.
    Anonymous 3 years ago in reply to Anonymous
    Normally people think that windows way is the friendly user, Mac and Linux are more friendly user that windows, with toons of options to use!
    Anonymous 3 years ago
    Seriously, people need to uninstall Windows from their heads. M$ isn't ever going to develop a OS better than the good Linux distros out there. ROFLOL
    Anonymous 3 years ago in reply to Anonymous
    Windows is not a good OS, is the most used because the people use it, but, if slowly the marked start pointing to the other direction (Mac and Linux) windows will finish without people, because, Linux and Mac are better Options!

      Add a comment

      Post a comment using one of these accounts
      Or join now
      At least 6 characters

      Note: Comment will appear soon after you have activated your account.
      Obscene/spam comments will be removed and accounts suspended.
      The information you submit is subject to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

      ITworld LIVE

      WindowsWhite Papers & Webcasts

      White Paper

      Microsoft Volume Licensing Reference Guide

      This guide provides an overview of the key features of Microsoft Volume Licensing programs. The information is presented by organizational type and size-two of the most important keys to determining your best Volume Licensing option.

      White Paper

      HP Software Licensing & Management Solutions for Microsoft

      See how HP Software Licensing & Management Solutions (SLMS) can help you identify the best Microsoft licensing program for your needs, get the most from your licensing agreement, and maximize your Microsoft software investment.

      White Paper

      Microsoft Open Value Program Guide

      In this overview, see how Microsoft Open Value provides a flexible, affordable way for small to midsize organizations (i.e. those with five or more desktop PCs) to use and manage all their Microsoft licensed products under a single agreement.

      White Paper

      Microsoft Volume Licensing Comparison - Enterprise

      With this quick-reference document, you can easily compare the available Microsoft Volume Licensing programs for enterprise organizations with 250+ devices, and tailor a program to help save costs, manage multiple licenses, and keep software up-to-date.

      White Paper

      Microsoft Enterprise Agreement Program Brief

      This white paper provides an in-depth look into how the Microsoft Enterprise Agreement Program provides with flexibility to choose among on-premises software and cloud services to best suit your user needs, and helps you optimize your technology spend as business priorities change.

      See more White Papers | Webcasts

      Ask a question

      Ask a Question