VoIP Now Voice Over Internet Plumbing

By James Gaskin  5 comments

I've never liked the acronym VoIP because it sounds so stupid out loud (vo-eep). But alas, the world yet again ignored my suggestions. Now I will try to recast the acronym to at least mean something much closer to the perception of many in the VoIP business: VoIP is now just phones over different plumbing, and no longer a Big Deal.

Early on, Internet phone people made a Big Deal about voice over the Internet because it differentiated them from standard phone systems. At least it did in the minds of phone prospects that didn't know major voice carriers had already digitized voice and were routing their long distance calls over private and public data networks for years and years.

I believe two conditions exist now that make the idea of “VoIP” as a Big Deal a dead issue. First, many people already know that digitized voice calls go over the Internet. Second, people who don't know that don't care, and are happy to use cell phones without thinking of how their calls go over wireless signals to something that connects to something that reaches the person they want. To the second group, all the technology is black magic, and they just care about their bills.

Let's repeat that last bit: they just care about their bills. Small and medium businesses just want to upgrade their phones to some new system that does more and costs less. They don't care if that's an old fashioned PBX that hangs on the wall, or a new-fangled VoIP system that runs on a server. Users won't mess with it no matter which model it is, and the tech people want more management and more control, and that usually means VoIP today. But the IT people aren't buying VoIP because it runs on the fancy “Internet” they heard about, but because it gives them more for less.

I have been amazed that VoIP people still flog the “VoIP” name like it means something today. It doesn't. To the end user, a phone is a phone is a cell phone is a headset. With all the security warnings, what small business wants a special “Internet Phone” system when the Internet's full of hackers and spammers?

VoIP vendors have yet to really highlight the differences VoIP makes for small businesses. Until they do, the old fashioned PBX dealers that now offer hybrid PBX-VoIP systems or whatever else they can sell to their loyal customers will keep winning competitive bids.

It's a phone, the signal is digitized sooner or later, and the connection goes over public or private networks. It's Voice Over Internet Plumbing. Until VoIP vendors update their sales pitches, they'll keep confusing business prospects.

5 comments

    Anonymous 2 years ago
    James,Late response but the use of the acronym is even worse than that. When my prospective customers hear the term VOIP they think it means voice over the internet, not voice over internet protocol...and there's a big difference. The protocol itself allows for prioritization of packets thus allowing for quality of service....whereas the internet at this point in time does not respect packet prioritization. To bundle VoIP PBX's, and Managed Hosted VoIP Services that can provide QoS with Voice Over Internet services (Skype, Vonage, among others) that cannot is a travesty. Your assertion that 'VOIP' services are now equivalent to traditional digital services is only correct in instances where packet prioritization can be implemented. There are a ton of VOIP services that cannot and it important to calve them off.
    Anonymous 3 years ago
    Despite its name, IP is used for much more than communicating over the internet. Much of the value in moving to VoIP is in consolidating the local infrastructure and management. Any small business with a LAN can benefit from tossing (or forgoing) a collection of multi-line phones or an outdated key system in favor of a solution such as Switchvox. Even if they continue to use plain ol' telephone service for their dialtone, using IP for voice is empowering. And yes, positions them for all the video and non-voice IP communications on the horizon.
    Anonymous 3 years ago
    James, you're entirely right that the word VoIP is bad. Not only does it sound ugly, it does not really convey the whole idea. The primary objective -- at least for those of us working on H.323 and now the new forthcoming H.325 -- was to build multimedia communucation systems, not just "voice" systems. Heck, if voice is all we got, why bother? I already had a prefectly fine phone before.For this reason, we removed virtually all references to VoIP from Packetizer. Instead, we refer to IP Multimedia Communications (IPMC). Perhaps that's not so good, either, as one cannot pronounce it, but it is more descriptive.
    Anonymous 3 years ago
    You know, the main reason why nearly everyone is turning to VoIP is that it gets them to save tremendous amounts of money. This is solid fact, and independent of other factors, is a reason solid enough to agree that VoIP is actually 'A Deal'. A month ago, I could not afford certain calls abroad. Now, I make calls wherever, whenever, to whoever and how-much-time-ever I want... for free, thanks to VoIP. If your reasons for demeriting VoIP boil down to security, then I guess you have to be more convincing than that. Huh, James?
    Anonymous 3 years ago
    The reaction to the VoIP label echoes my sentiments that I wrote about when it first appeared. However, what users want in addition to lower costs, is effective communication functionality. That means not just voice conversations, but increasingly text messaging as well. In fact, the convenience of voice messaging on the part of a caller is moving to more efficient retrieval by the recipient through automated transcription into text messages.So, even desktop and mobile phones are changing into more flexible, multimodal, UC devices that are not just for real-time voice conversations, but whatever form of contact an individual end user needs at any point in time. That's where the real interesting action will be taking place - at personalized end user device interface(s), not just the resulting traffic loads through the wired and wireless pipes that connect the devices.

      Add a comment

      Post a comment using one of these accounts
      Or join now
      At least 6 characters

      Note: Comment will appear soon after you have activated your account.
      Obscene/spam comments will be removed and accounts suspended.
      The information you submit is subject to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

      ITworld LIVE

      Small BusinessWhite Papers & Webcasts

      White Paper

      Microsoft Volume Licensing Comparison - Small/Med. Business

      This quick-reference document lets small and medium organizations (i.e. those with five or more devices) to easily compare the available Microsoft Volume Licensing programs to create a simple, cost-effective and flexible way to benefit from volume licensing.

      White Paper

      ESG: Oracle Database Appliance: A Simple, Economical Option for SMBs and Independent Software Vendors

      Read this technology overview of a DBMS built for SMBs that provides a rapidly-deployable, highly-available platform at an affordable cost

      See more White Papers | Webcasts

      Ask a question

      Ask a Question