Sci Fi channel becoming Syfy. Huh?

By Peter Smith  59 comments

We don't usually cover TV at ITworld, but this story was just too good to pass up.

A TV Week article claims that NBC Universal has decided to change the name of their Sci Fi Channel in an attempt to pull in a more mainstream audience. The new name? Syfy. (Tagline: Imagine Greater) This move is being made as The Sci Fi Channel comes off its best year to date.

The immediate reaction of sci fi fans on the web? Disbelief and derision. Followed by anger.

Why anger? Because, proving he has his finger on the pulse of the current generation, "TV Historian" Tim Brooks has this to say:

The name Sci Fi has been associated with geeks and dysfunctional, antisocial boys in their basements with video games and stuff like that, as opposed to the general public and the female audience in particular.

Way to win friends and influence people, Mr. Brooks.

In all fairness, Brooks is listed as someone "who helped launch Sci Fi Channel when he worked at USA Network" so maybe we shouldn't be annoyed with NBC over that quote.

Dave Howe, president of the Sci Fi Channel, had this to say about the name change:

It gives us a unique word and it gives us the opportunities to imbue it with the values and the perception that we want it to have.

The perception I'm reading from the folks on twitter is that "Syfy" sounds like slang for syphilis. Probably not the perception that Howe was hoping for. (For a more immediate 'twitter-pulse' in regards to the term, click here.)

Granted, we twitterers are exactly the people that Howe no longer sees as important to the success of the channel. Or are we? Another Howe quote:

When we tested this new name, the thing that we got back from our 18-to-34 techno-savvy crowd, which is quite a lot of our audience, is actually this is how you'd text it,” Mr. Howe said. “It made us feel much cooler, much more cutting-edge, much more hip, which was kind of bang-on what we wanted to achieve communication-wise.

I'm hearing mixed signals here. Do they want the geeks or not? Or do they see "techno-savvy" and "geek" being two different demographics. One starts to wonder: is this all a big prank? An early April Fool's joke? He can't really believe what he is saying, can he?

But syfy.com (destined to replace scifi.com) is already live. And in truth, the channel has content that isn't even remotely science fiction related, like wrestling or the new WGC Ultimate Gamer reality series. So perhaps a change of branding is in order. But... Syfy? Really?

Syfy is set to go live on July 7th, 2009.

Follow Peter on Google+

Peter Smith writes about personal technology for ITworld.

59 comments

Kiara
Kiara 1 year ago
Sci Fi channel becoming Syfy.I was very much interested to know about it.As time changes the people perception also changes .It gives us a unique word and it gives us the opportunities to imbue it with the values and the perception that we want it to have.vitabiotics supplements
Anonymous 1 year ago
When systems is this game coming out for?
Anonymous 1 year ago
It's gotten worse. I like Eureka and Warehouse 13 but I don't love them. Despite the channel disowning us geeks, most of us have we've stayed loyal. I'm over it.I'm 21 now and discovered my love of Sci Fi as a kid with this channel. It's a good thing kids today have the internet, for SyFy will not be leading the way in their discovery of anything that's not a megasomething or other.
Anonymous 2 years ago
How comes every holiday SyFy pumps aging Twilight Zone 1/2 century old garbage down our throats? You know what that means? Millions of si-fi fans will be tuning-out of their broadcasts. Just set it to auto-play, all the tech-geeks go home and have a good time, throw in 25-30% of viewing as the same commercials over and over again until you don't even want to watch the next show trailers or buy the products (brain-washing), which BTW no one sees if a very young BLACK & WHITE Bill Shatner is having a bad plane trip. Get real or get out of the business. You do a GREAT job of making your excuse for good science fiction entertainment about as dated as the first season of Star-Trek. Since Stargate crashed and it looks like more sci-fi soap with Retro-Cylons for 2010, throw in some ECW sport (phony wresting) which has NOTHING what-so-ever to do with what your channel is all about, and I am surprised you still have a license to broadcast. Try the whole 1st season of 'Lost in Space' with that level of moronic pulp trash you could maybe sell it for prime-time Saturday night viewing, get real or get off my T.V. set! You are cheap and getting pathetic with your low-end BORING pulp garbage programming.
Anonymous 2 years ago
As a marketing specialist, I've found that re-inventing yourself (at times) can be exsorbitantly expensive, counterproductive, but simply put.. A disasterous idea. And here we are.. blogging about the unexpected permutation of a acknowledged discriptive form of an abreviated name, to an acrymonious "what the hell does that mean", re-branding of a fierce, demographically based cable network. Not to suggest the "Sci-fi" channels programming didn't need a little work and attention.. but the obvious place to start (in my mind) is not in "cutifying" the name!! In this case- Let's assume all programming is to remain static (in the short term). Changing a name, can easily act to irrate and/or alienate diehard viewers (case in point).. but further, to confuse new or potentially new viewers, that last I checked, NBC could so desperately use (seen a Nielsen report lately). Some food for thought- (from some what of a consp-theoist.. lol)Is it possible that NBC thinks we are intellectually comatosed, or "Hulu'd" (if I might borrow from a humorous, actually successful branding campaign) that they can conspicuously divert our attention from regular arguements about "quality of programming", to re-focusing the "herd" (us), to arguements over the name. Or, to expand that thought.. Are these simply diversion tactics! If so, from what?! It goes to suggest, that since Dewey found decimals, that we should somehow be so ignorant as to not mind the silly mutation of an accepted abreviated name. Are we to assume that the next time we visit the library, we can expect to find the S-Y-F-Y section, and will that be between the H-I-Z section (short for History) and the O-L-F or "Other than Fiction" sections. A wise person (who doesn't work for NBC)once said.. "Don't run from that which can be fixed".. So NBC, fix the station.. before you run with a new name..Now completes my soapbox regarding Sci-Fi/SyFy..
Anonymous 2 years ago
Why fix what ain't fupped! Are they trying to avoid the mySpace "failure"? It's just about money (which is quite defensible) and not about fan/user satisfaction. Somebody tell me how the big suits think, please!
Anonymous 2 years ago
Just another narcissistic, self-congratulatory network exec clusterf@&k.
Anonymous 2 years ago
It makes little difference what the name is. If they show good programs, I will watch. If not, I won't.The new name is a signal that the crap quotient is going to be boosted.
Anonymous 2 years ago
Syfy ... Oh my ...I don't trust acronyms ( ? ) that have an " F " in them.Too many off-color ideas come to mind about what syfy may stand for...But they all end in "F" You....Is this supposed to appeal to the metro-sexual side of science fiction fans or to their feminine side ?Frankly, it doesn't seem to appeal to anyone at all.Still if this NBC owned company wants to spend millions in promoting this white-elephant, that's their choice.My opinions are free !
Anonymous 2 years ago
I mean, seriously, how stupid is this "name change"?Keep on playing "the gentiles", america. They're sticking it up your rear and from all angles, and you seem to be enjoying it. You're not turning into an 'idiocracy'. You ARE an idiocracy already.When they started to show wrestling on scifi, people just took it. Is it any wonder then that nbc stoops to this new low? Goodness, what's next!?I dumped the scifi channel a 'long time' ago.--- "...Bombaka mouth, man!"
Anonymous 2 years ago
The movie Idiocracy was a great glimpse of out future. Now that Scifi is dead and SyFy is born, we can open the doors to the bottom taking over the top.I have always loved science fiction, it gives us a view of the minds that believe there is more out there. It lets us see a view of the group that see the world in a sinkhole. I have, for a long time, seen the downfall of mankind at hand. We in America are driving the bus to oblivion. English is dying, and in its place we will have our new language....abbrevish. You are stupid if you use real complete words.We don't talk anymore, you have to TXT everyone for everything. What do U want to use words 4? Wii have abbrevish. Its GR8! Saves time and I don't have to think! Less thinking is better!! WHOOOA YEA! Thank you for the dumb inheriting the Earth, I didn't want to be here anyways.When will an alien race come and annihilate this dust ball? We gave up good reasons to let our race to survive the minute MTV stopped playing music. My faith in humanity dwindles with every passing day, and with every news story I read that defines its news from twitter references.If there is a god or gods, we better hope they have a sense of humor because we are all damned.And a last bit, frak NBC.... its SciFi you frakking skinjobs.
Anonymous 2 years ago
they're not able to trademark (and, therefore, make money from) "SciFi" - as it's in the public domain.they *are* able to trademark, and make money from, "SyFy".QED?also, the "controversy" gets them lots of column inches in papers/online/tv, as the only thing worse than being talked about is *not* being talked about.however, i'm surprised to see so little comment about the tagline: "Imagine Greater"Imagine Greater....what? They seem to be missing a word. ;-)
Anonymous 2 years ago
1) Your viewers think Sci Fi is hip already and SyFy is really going to be the Uranus of TV network names.2) Have a dialog with your viewers (we don't like wrestling, ghosts hunters or large creatures attacking rural communities) these are just lame. 3) Your made for TV movies are terrible 95% of the time and the couple that are any good I missed because there is so much garbage. (I have a wall full of Sci Fi books I read as a kid, you can start there for plots) It might be a good idea to hire a scientist/sci fi reader to do the programming - Not the Bernie Madoff clone you have now.4) We do watch Mythbusters, Prototype This, Time Warp, Star trek, Star Wars, Futurama, The Big Bang Theory, Lie to Me, CSI, Numbers (sometime), Criminal Minds, The Science Channel - when its science/engineering, the History Channel and NatGeo, SG-1, BSG, The Doctor, The Iron Chef, Top Chef and Project Runway (We do have a daughter and 2 sons )5) Those nerdy teenage boys (and girls) and thier geek Dads & Moms created everything you own/use in your life. We just want programs that can stimulate our minds or warn us of the dangers inherit in the future done with a interesting plot and good acting. This is why we love Science Fiction. If you have a good product people will come. There are 140 other channels trying to get the anti-intellectual viewers, how about just one entertainment channel for us! If not I'll keep reading to my kids that wall of books is high and long.
Anonymous 2 years ago
"I can't type 1 extra character..."The brand will fail as old schoolers are the longterm majority of the "geeks" that buy the products over a longer period and the genre of SCI FI says much more to most people than the techno-geek speak of a few fleeting favors of the month. They needed to do a REAL survey between (and keep it evergreen):Sci Fi ChannelVs.Syfy Channel to the average person on the street or at SCI FI conventions instead of texting their "perceived" audience to see which makes the most sense.As soon as half the shows currently on disappear, they will not have that fan base as much as they think :P
Anonymous 2 years ago
NBC doesn't realized the diversity of the geek nation. Its all types of people not just the bs stereotype portrayed in the article. But like someone said above the media attention from the name change is going to bring more viewers and I promise you they know what they are risking. They took a risk assessment and know that the media attention is going to drive people to watch with all the competition for viewers and with all the good shows they probably think its the best shot for them.
Anonymous 2 years ago
I see all the reasons they chose to do this listed in the TV Week article and elsewhere, but in my opinion the name change will accomplish almost none of those goals. Given the backlash online, I'm now wondering what the odds are that they'll change plans and either keep their current name or create another new one.More here: http://www.semanticargument.com/?p=175#more-175
Anonymous 2 years ago
Why rename the channel, unless you are trying to lose your audience? Just the opinion of another 50+ female geek who watches the SciFi Channel.
Anonymous 2 years ago
Is this something dreamt up by Jack Donaghy?
Anonymous 2 years ago
It would be better to leave the name alone and show only Science Fiction shows. Oophs I forgot I am a 50 year female and not the target audience.
Anonymous 2 years ago
Sadly, it finally makes sense to me that Howe and Brooks and the execs at the Scifi channel have no understanding of nor respect for us scifi geeks … it is obvious from the utter crap they serve up on their channel which ranges from awful to insultingly bad with the notable exception of Battlestar Galactica. I long ago gave up hoping for anything good from that channel. I don’t think the name change is going to help their line up any nor improve my feelings towards them.It stuns me, too, that they seem totally unaware of the fact that scifi is mainstream already: just look at some of the most popular and highest grossing movies, Star Wars, Lord of the Rings, Harry Potter, Pirates of the Caribbean, Jurassic Park, Indiana Jones and all the comic book movies: Batman/The Dark Knight, Watchmen, Spiderman, Xmen, Iron Man, etc.“Nevertheless, there was always a sneaking suspicion that the name was holding the network back.”Dudes, its not the name, it’s the crap you serve up! Your asses were saved solely by the power of great writing/drama, excellent acting, great special effects on Battlestar Galactica.“We spent a lot of time in the ’90s trying to distance the network from science fiction, which is largely why it’s called Sci Fi,” Mr. Brooks said. “It’s somewhat cooler and better than the name ‘Science Fiction.’ But even the name Sci Fi is limiting.”??? Huh? You are called the SCIFI CHANNEL!! Why do you want to distance yourselves from that? To me that’s like the food network distancing itself from food and cooking because they think it might be associated with fat people! I say Embrace the Geeks! For we are taking over the world!Man I hate these guys!
Anonymous 2 years ago
Sounds to me that the phonetics of the new name could also be pronounced "siff eee", which makes me think of it as being a slang term for syphillis. ;)
mulderjoe 2 years ago
Don't marketers realize that people are just turned off by the letter "y"? Someone should let them know, asap!
Anonymous 2 years ago
Thanks for giving me that final reason to change the channel and never look back. More book reading for this old school Sci Fi nerd.

Add a comment

Post a comment using one of these accounts
Or join now
At least 6 characters

Note: Comment will appear soon after you have activated your account.
Obscene/spam comments will be removed and accounts suspended.
The information you submit is subject to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

ITworld LIVE

Ask a question

Ask a Question