OpenOffice.org 3.1: The next generation

By Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols, Computerworld |  Open Source, office suite, OpenOffice.org 5 comments

The latest version of the open-source office suite OpenOffice.org 3.1 has just arrived, and it's a good one. While some of the improvements are visible to the naked eye, I found that the most important changes were hidden under the hood.

What is it? OpenOffice.org 3.1 is a set of office productivity applications: Writer (word processor), Calc (spreadsheet), Impress (presentation manager) and Base (database manager). It's missing an Outlook substitute, but otherwise it's a complete replacement for Microsoft Office. The suite is available as a free download for Linux, Mac OS X, Solaris, and Windows; there are versions for most major languages.

What does it do? The first thing you'll notice about the new OpenOffice.org is that it just looks better. Thanks to its use of anti-aliasing, the program menus, letters and images it displays are sharper and clearer. (You can see examples at Sun's OpenOffice.org engineering blog.)

I tested the suite on a Windows XP system and one running MEPIS 8, a Debian-based Linux distribution. What really caught my attention after a few minutes of using the various OpenOffice.org apps was how much faster this version is than version 3.0. This was especially clear on when I ran it on a Windows XP system. It used to take about 12 seconds to launch Writer; now it takes just over 6 seconds. I saw similar performance boosts when running the various other applications. It's almost like running OpenOffice.org on a brand new machine.

Another good feature, if you're considering OpenOffice.org for office use, is that it now has its own OS-independent file-locking system. Now Jack in marketing, who uses a Mac, can't overwrite a change that was just made by Jill in the (Windows-based) comptroller's office.

I tried to mangle a shared document (that existed on a Windows Server 2008 file server) by editing it from my Linux desktop and also from my XP desktop. I couldn't do it. The file-locking mechanism preserved the document from my best attempts to make a complete mess of it.

What's cool about it? OpenOffice.org, like the Firefox Web browser, can use extensions to increase its functionality. For example, Writer's existing grammar checker framework can now be augmented with extensions like LanguageTool. It won't significantly improve your writing, but it will save you from some of the more idiotic grammar errors. I've been waiting for this feature since OpenOffice.org first showed up. (Although I did encounter some Java run-time errors when I tried to run it.)

In Calc, OpenOffice.org's answer to Excel, performance has been given an incredible boost. Complicated spreadsheets that in the past allowed me to take a 5-minute coffee break while they finished their calculations now run in five seconds. In the past, I kept a copy of Excel around for taking care of heavy-duty spreadsheet jobs. I won't need to do that anymore.

What needs to be fixed? It's not all good news. Much as I dislike sitting through PowerPoint presentations, I know that many people rely on PowerPoint every day to get their points across. Impress, OpenOffice.org's presentation manager, is good, but it's not PowerPoint good. There are some improvements, thanks in large part to anti-aliasing making the graphics sharper, but it simply doesn't offer as many features. If you just do presentations once in a blue moon, Impress is fine. If you make your living with PowerPoint, you won't be impressed with Impress.

Final verdict: I've been using OpenOffice.org for years now. With these performance and appearance improvements, I can see more users moving to this free office suite. In particular, I think anyone who does spreadsheets every day owes it to themselves to compare Calc and Excel. You'll be impressed.

Calc aside, OpenOffice.org 3.1 isn't a major step forward. But if you're getting tired of paying for a new version of Microsoft Office every few years, you should try this latest edition of OpenOffice.org. Except for advanced presentations, there's nothing you can't do in the free OpenOffice.org that you can in the ever-more-pricey Microsoft Office.

Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols has been writing about technology and the business of technology since CP/M-80 was cutting edge and 300bit/sec. was a fast Internet connection -- and we liked it! He can be reached at sjvn@vna1.com.

5 comments

    Anonymous 2 years ago
    Janiyah
    Janiyah 2 years ago
    There are lots of people today that are willing to work at home. Everyone could use a few home office tips. A lot of people work from home, and having a good home office is paramount. One of the best home office tips is that you have to keep the office separated from the home. You could even put a cash advance to good use putting in a separate phone line and answering machine, or a get a consultant in to give some Feng Shui home office tips.
    Anonymous 2 years ago
    Our state is cutting school funding. Nevada already is near the bottom of school funding in the U.S. so this is no small event. The school district pays Microsoft $1.2M a year for licenses and more for updates. The district has been sold a bill of goods by MS that students MUST know MSOffice or they will fail. The reality is that anyone learning the fundamentals of, say, word processing can move between any "brand." So, why not use OpenOffice and take that $1.2M and apply it to better facilities or more teachers instead of sending it as a "tax" to MS?
    Anonymous 2 years ago
    I've been using Open Office for years (since it was Star Office, owned by Star Division). It works very well. Calc has been rather slow for large sheets - spending allot of time "adjusting row height" but I've always felt it worked better than Excel. If performance in that regard is improved it will be major for me.
    Anonymous 2 years ago
    I completely agree.The new MS office 2007 is very nice to look at but still does not hold a candle to Open office's simpler interface.Even at 100.00 for the student/home version MS office is still overpriced compared to what Open office does.I have been using Open Office for several years and actually can not use the newer MS office. MS office is just to confusing now.

      Add a comment

      Post a comment using one of these accounts
      Or join now
      At least 6 characters

      Note: Comment will appear soon after you have activated your account.
      Obscene/spam comments will be removed and accounts suspended.
      The information you submit is subject to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

      ITworld LIVE

      Open SourceWhite Papers & Webcasts

      White Paper

      Consolidating SAP Applications to Linux on Power by IDC

      IDC studied a group of enterprises that had deployed SAP applications on IBM Power Systems servers running Linux server operating environments and had been working with those systems for several years. Learn about the results...

      White Paper

      An Interactive eGuide: Open Source

      By now, enterprises are well aware of the benefits of open-source software, which boasts a clean design, reliability, and maintainability, as well as support for standards and community values. But perhaps the biggest benefit is quality; since open-source software users have access to source code, bug fixes and enhancements come from multiple sources, often resulting in superior software.

      See more White Papers | Webcasts

      Ask a question

      Ask a Question