Survey: US residents don't want targeted ads

By Grant Gross, IDG News Service |  Government, advertising, online advertising 8 comments

Contrary to the claims of online marketers, most U.S. residents do not want to receive Web advertising tailored to their interests, according to a study released Wednesday by two universities.

Sixty-six percent of those surveyed don't want tailored, or targeted, online ads, according to the study, from the Berkeley Center for Law and Technology at the University of California Berkeley School of Law and the Annenberg School for Communication at the University of Pennsylvania.

Asked if online ad vendors should deliver targeted ads by tracking customers' behavior across multiple Web sites, 86 percent of the 1,000 respondents said no.

"While privacy advocates have lambasted behavioral targeting for tracking and labeling people in ways they do not know or understand, marketers have defended the practice by insisting it gives Americans what they want: advertisements and other forms of content that are as relevant to their lives as possible," the study said. "In high percentages, [U.S. residents] stand on the side of privacy advocates."

Jon Leibowitz, chairman of the U.S. Federal Trade Commission, called the new survey "meaningful" and suggested that it may drive U.S. lawmakers to focus more on new privacy laws. The report could also prompt online marketers to take a new look at their own policies, he said.

"It gives you a sense that consumers really want their privacy protected," he said. "They're very concerned about their personal information being used, especially in ways they're not aware of."

Thirty-five percent of respondents said executives of companies that use personal information illegally should face jail time, and 18 percent said those companies should be put out of business.

The new study seems to conflict with the results of a March survey by Internet privacy services vendor TRUSTe.

The TRUSTe survey found that two out of three consumers were aware that their browsing information may be collected by a third party for advertising purposes. In addition, the survey found that 51 percent of those surveyed were uncomfortable with behavioral advertising, compared to 57 percent in 2008.

"Statistics are a funny thing," said Mike Zaneis, vice president for public policy at the Interactive Advertising Bureau (IAB), a trade group for online marketers. "[TRUSTe] too polled over a thousand consumers, but focused on online users, the very constituency who might have legitimate privacy concerns about online behavioral advertising. TRUSTe’s results were strikingly different."

Consumers "love" the Web content and services that online advertising pays for, Zaneis added in an e-mail. "It is also clear that consumers have rejected the scattershot approach of spam messaging, and prefer to receive marketing messages that are relevant to their needs and desires," he said. "This relevancy, the elimination of advertising 'noise' from people’s daily lives, is the promise that interactive advertising presents to consumers and companies alike."

The fact that TRUSTe used an online survey skews the results, countered Joseph Turow, a communications professor at the University of Pennsylvania and co-author of the new report. The Berkeley/University of Pennsylvania phone survey may better reflect the overall attitudes about targeted advertising across the U.S., not just the position of people who take the initiative to answer an online survey, he said.

IAB and other advertising groups released new online privacy principles in July. Online advertising networks should "maintain appropriate physical, electronic, and administrative safeguards" to protect data collected, and they should retain the data "only as long as necessary to fulfill a legitimate business need, or as required by law," the principles said.

"This self-regulatory regime ... will ensure that consumers have ready access to information about behavioral targeting and are always empowered to exercise their choice to not have this information used to deliver more relevant ads back to them," Zaneis said.

U.S. Representative Rick Boucher, a Virginia Democrat and chairman of the House Subcommittee on Communications, Technology, and the Internet, has said he plans to introduce legislation this year that would require opt-in permission for Web sites to collect personal data. Several lawmakers and privacy advocates have expressed recent concerns that online advertising networks are collecting too much information about Web users without adequately informing them.

A privacy bill is worth considering, Turow said. "Self-regulation has a long history of failure, as well as some successes," he said.

8 comments

    Anonymous 1 year ago
    If you asked the same group, they would probably prefer NO ADS AT ALL! Who is brainless enough to believe a poll done by some media group? Feed a test group targeted ads for a few months and THEN ask them if it was better and I bet you get a totally different opinion.
    Anonymous 2 years ago
    Are you kidding me? Americans purchase $1.4 TRILLION each year through direct marketing alone (e.g., direct mail, catalogs, telemarketing, email). No one wants unsolicited marketing. But give them the choice to pay 20% more for everything, or allow companies to target based on publicly available information (the Internet is public by the way) and see what they say. Please tell me what the downside of using online behavior to present more relevant ads. The downside to not targeting, however, is quite substantial. Without targeting, many small niche companies would not be able to profitably develop and sell their products. Retailers in general would have to increase product prices to cover all their costs. Better targeting enables more competitive retailers to make a profit at lower prices, forcing all others to lower their prices to survive. Behavioral targeting is becoming one of the dominant factors that is helping lower prices.This survey is almost as bad as asking a kid if they like doctors. Should we outlaw doctors because kids don't understand the benefits they receive?But PLEASE, can anyone tell me the downside? Keep in mind that the use of personal financial, credit and health information is already well regulated and illegal for most marketing activities.
    Anonymous 2 years ago
    I would rather be presented with ads that were specifically geared towards things I like since it could be something I do not like such as an ad for make-up.
    Anonymous 2 years ago
    Of course people are going to say they don't like being tracked. The problem is that the question is being framed improperly - if you asked these same people if they'd prefer ads relevant to them, they'd probably say yes. In either case, however, the data is irrelevant; targeted advertising has significant improvements in conversion rates, which demonstrates that it works, and therefore benefits the person who was probably unaware that they were being tracked. Notification is fine, but if you enforce an ominous 'This website is tracking your behavior, be careful!', advertisements will suffer and the content they pay for will get less money, possibly leading to a decrease in available services. Whereas I wouldn't argue that as a reason to keep it in place, it is certainly a concern as I'd rather see products targeted towards me that I might buy to pay for the services I use on the internet.
    Anonymous 2 years ago in reply to Anonymous
    I do not want to see *any, any, any* advertising at all. Ever. Period. What kind of moron wants to have someone telling them "Here's something you might be interested in."? The kind of moron that reads ads and clicks shiny buttons. When and if I decide I need something, I research it, compare items and then make my decision. I don't need some douche trying to make a quick buck thinking I'll go for the "impulse buy". There is another way to live in this world - make your own decisions. Dump your cable TV, join your library, check out movies, music, use every ad-blocking software you can find. Learn to play an instrument. Learn to paint. Learn to meditate, Learn tai chi, Learn to write poetry. Learn to cook and bake. Spend time with friends and family. Get a life not controlled by the media. Seriously.Stop being a mindless consumer. If you didn't think you needed it before someone offered to sell it to you, YOU DON'T NEED IT.Learn to think for yourself.
    Anonymous 2 years ago
    http://visionaforethought.wordpress.com/2009/09/07/interactive-advertising/
    Anonymous 2 years ago
    Jon Leibowitz, chairman of the U.S. Federal Trade Commission, called the new survey "meaningful" I believe that he meant "meaningless"
    Anonymous 2 years ago
    The spokesdrone from TRUSTe clearly implies only their study "focused on online users". Is he correct? Did the universities also "focus" on "online users"? Or some other group, such as Congo kasai mice?

      Add a comment

      Post a comment using one of these accounts
      Or join now
      At least 6 characters

      Note: Comment will appear soon after you have activated your account.
      Obscene/spam comments will be removed and accounts suspended.
      The information you submit is subject to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

      ITworld LIVE

      Ask a question

      Ask a Question