Where Microsoft lost its way - Google obsession

By Don Reisinger, ITworld.com |  Business, Google, Microsoft 3 comments

Microsoft has always been a software company and Google has always been an online services firm. Historically speaking, Google has never sold an operating system (or anything else for that matter) and Bill Gates and company have yet to embrace any online service that won't allow it to turn a profit.

Knowing that, why are Microsoft and Google such fierce competitors? Surely, the latter would have been content controlling the online space without competing against the former, but why did Microsoft decide to pick a fight with one of the most powerful online firms in the world?

Believe it or not, the answer is actually quite simple - jealousy.

And it's that jealousy that has not only forced Microsoft into a corner, it has led the company to believe it can be a bloated mess and offer a wide array of products without focusing on its core competency - software.

Microsoft's Google obsession started when Sergey Brin and Larry Page did something no other company could do - grow in the face of Bill Gates to a level that not even his company's $2 billion profit per quarter could stand up to. After all, if Microsoft held on to anything over the past decade, it certainly latched on to the belief that because it was the most powerful company in the technology industry, it could do practically anything it wanted. But all that has changed.

Because of Google's meteoric rise and its staggering profitability, it has become one of the most powerful companies in the world and one of the few that can stand up to Microsoft. To make matters worse, it's the good guy to most people and its services don't aim to gouge your wallet even though they work extremely well. Instead, Google has embraced a new philosophy -- "Don't be evil" -- and so far, it has done a pretty good job of sticking to it. For the first time in recent memory, Microsoft is the company without the advantage and realizing this, it has lost its focus on software and ensuring Office and Windows are up-to-par. Instead, the company's focus has moved towards the online space and it's doing all it can to supplant Google as the de facto leader.

In just the past year, Microsoft acquired aQuantive, a relatively unknown advertising company after Google acquired Doubleclick; it bought into Facebook and acquired advertising rights after Google went after MySpace's advertising and has tried to downplay the significance of Google.

"Google is not ahead of us," Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer told reporters in Tokyo last year. "In the area of search specifically, Google would lead."

Really, Steve? As far as I can tell, Microsoft is behind in advertising, online applications, productivity tools, Webmaster tools and many more. To make matters worse, the company is behind in the realm of software now too. But if it weren't for Google, I doubt all that would be true.

Let's face it -- Vista is a downright dog. With a slew of issues, including slow load times, bloated code and a User Access Control that forces you into click fatigue, it looks more like a beta release than a final build. To make matters worse, the company decided to pursue its ill-fated "Vista Capable" campaign and seems to have lost its sense of what's best for the consumer.

Is Mac OS X a perfect operating system? Of course not. But when compared to Vista, I don't think anyone can say that Windows is better than Apple's offering. Knowing this, why hasn't Microsoft gone out of its way to stem Apple's advance and improve Vista as soon as possible? Does it actually believe SP1 is the only piece of the pie that's missing? If not, why hasn't the company done more in the software realm?

In a word -- Google.

In one fell swoop, Google came along and utterly destroyed the foundation of Microsoft's control over the tech industry. And in so doing, Microsoft lost its focus and abandoned its core business to stop Google's march to the top of the online mountain. But what the company never realized and still doesn't is its bifurcated focus is dangerous and could ultimately lead to its downfall.

It's time to play nice with Google, Microsoft. Or else.

3 comments

    Anonymous 3 years ago
    I think you don't decide who is the most powerful company on earth like that. First, there has to be a connection with the time: today is 2008. 10 years ago, it was Microsoft, today maybe Google. Second, it can be sometimes difficult to have values to refer to judge whichi company is the most powerful.My guess is : let the highest bidder win !Alexhttp://www.themostpowerfulcompany.com
    Anonymous 3 years ago
    I think that Microsoft stays the most powerful company on the planet...and you should check out this website to make your own opinion, it's pretty coolhttp://www.themostpowerfulcompany.com.html
    Anonymous 3 years ago
    I think that Microsoft is still the most powerful company in the world and by the way you should check out this website, it could help to understand which company is the most powerful:http://wwww.themostpowerfulcompany.com

      Add a comment

      Post a comment using one of these accounts
      Or join now
      At least 6 characters

      Note: Comment will appear soon after you have activated your account.
      Obscene/spam comments will be removed and accounts suspended.
      The information you submit is subject to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

      ITworld LIVE

      BusinessWhite Papers & Webcasts

      White Paper

      Insiders Can Ruin Your Company. Take Action.

      Did you know that 80 percent of threats to an organization come from the inside? The threat from insiders is often overlooked in organizations worldwide. This white paper from NetIQ, discusses key technology solutions that help to prevent and detect insider threats.

      White Paper

      Ten Steps to an Enterprise Mobility Strategy

      Enterprise employees are more mobile, relishing the ability to work productively anywhere, at any time. They may use any means to get connected, often creating financial and security risks for your company. Discover how to get control of your enterprise mobility strategy and ensure mobile worker productivity with these ten steps.

      White Paper

      What You Need to Know About the Costs of Mobility

      Mobile workers want to get connected anywhere, at any time, often at any cost. Enterprise mobility is often a hidden "black" budget in your company. Ensure that your traveling employees are productive everywhere, even while you control cost and security, through an enterprise mobility strategy.

      White Paper

      The 2011 iPass Mobile Enterprise Report

      This industry survey covers trends, recommendations and a policy guide on managing Enterprise Mobility for IT management and CIOs. Get data on employee device liability, as well as smartphone/tablet penetration, budget control and provisioning. Find out how your organization compares, how to ensure mobile worker productivity, and control costs.

      White Paper

      Smarter Commerce is redefining value chain visibility

      Smarter Commerce is redefining the value chain in the age of the customer. It starts with putting the customer at the center of your operations - which of itself is not a new idea - however, truly operationalizing this strategy is not easy.

      See more White Papers | Webcasts

      Ask a question

      Ask a Question