Offbeat

Windows 7 Smells Far Better Than Vista

Small businesses need not be afraid of Windows 7

2 comments | 1I like it!
October 27, 2009, 09:16 AM — 

Microsoft sent me two copies of Windows 7 Ultimate last Friday (the 23rd) and I installed the 64bit version on the refurbished HP mini-tower I bought last year with Vista on it. Based on my interview with William Stanek, author of the just-released Windows 7: The Definitive Guide I did for the Daily Tip on Windows 7 Upgrade, I felt sure my fairly new HP would run 64bit Windows fine. Stanek promised almost every PC bought in the last
three years could run Windows 7 64bit. He's right in my case.

Not only fine, but faster and smoother than Vista by far. Since I went from 32bit Vista Home, I had to do a clean install. Fine with me – I wanted all traces of Vista gone and out of my mind as soon as possible. But as Stanek said, you can't go from 32bit to 64bit as an upgrade. Reports of Windows 7 upgrades stuck in a reboot loop? Early indications area that's caused by going from 32bit to 64bit as an upgrade, not a clean install.

Some applications have trouble with 64bit operating systems and need special versions to accommodate the OS. Nervously, I installed the apps I needed: Firefox and Chrome browsers, OpenOffice productivity suite, TheBrain mind mapping software, and the Foxit Reader PDF utility in place of Adobe. All work great without a hitch. So far, so good. I'm sure some older software I have around here may cause a problem, but I haven't gotten to those yet.

Windows 7 seems prettier than Vista, and cleaner and faster as well. Some or all of the speed difference can be attributed to the faster 64bit architecture, so I can't provide lab bench test numbers. Many other posts here and elsewhere have dissected Windows 7 already, so I'm more concerned about small business use of Windows 7 and whether they should work to upgrade or keep XP until they replace computers.

Is Windows 7 better than Vista? Absolutely. Is Windows 7 better than XP? Well, that's a harder question. Many people have trouble determining whether something is worse than what they have, or just different. Windows 7 is definitely different from XP, but not in the bad way Vista was different.

Should you upgrade working XP systems to Windows 7 just because? No. Don't go to the hassle and expense of upgrading good XP systems. On the other hand, when you get new PCs, don't go to the hassle and expense of downgrading them to XP like you did to avoid Vista. In that situation alone, we can see Windows 7 is a huge improvement over Vista.

I'll leave the argument about whether Microsoft should have made Windows 7 a free upgrade for Vista customers (they should, or just charge a few bucks for media and manuals) to another time (but Microsoft should have done that). For small businesses, Windows 7 won't hurt like Vista hurt. Don't be afraid.

Sign up for ITworld's Daily newsletter
Follow ITworld on Twitter @IT_world

I like it!
Comments

sounds odd

Vista is far better than XP, Win7 is far better than Vista. I don't think there is another answer.

I don't get all those lies about Vista. it is stunning lie that everyone tells each other. This is most stupid era in technology.
| reply

xp vista windows 7

I used Vista from when it came out until I put the final beta of windows 7. The extra functionality of Vista over XP made it painful if I had to use XP.

Windows 7 is better than Vista but once SP1 came out Vista was fine by me
| reply
peer-to-peer

Esther Schindler
If the comments are ugly, the code is ugly

claird
SVG a graphics format for 21st century

pasmith
Take Chrome OS for a test spin

Sandra Henry-Stocker
Solaris Tip: Have Your Files Changed Since Installation?

sjvn
64-bits of protection?

jfruh
Android fragments vs. the iPhone monolith

mikelgan
What Gizmodo missed about the Pro WX Wireless USB disk drive

 

Sidekick: The Good News & the Bad News
Either way you look at it Microsoft Data Center management did not follow standards or best practices in this failure. In which case it makes me wonder more about the outsourcing of corporate data much less personal data.
- mburton325

Join the conversation here

The Daily Tip

The Daily TipQuick, practical advice for IT pros. Made fresh daily.

Hot tips:

Want to cash in on your IT savvy? Send your tip to tips@itworld.com. If we post it, we'll send you a $25 Amazon e-gift card.

Newsletters

Subscribe to ITWORLD TODAY and receive the latest IT news and analysis.

I would like to receive offers via email from ITworld partners.
By clicking submit you agree to the terms and conditions outlined in ITworld's privacy policy.
Featured Sponsor

AISO founders envisioned a Web hosting company that was environmentally friendly. While the company employed energy-efficient innovations like solar panels, its infrastructure produced unacceptable power and cooling requirements. Find out how AISO leveraged AMD technology to overcome their challenge in this case study white paper.

In this whitepaper, Scalar explores the opportunity to change the landscape with respect to mission critical databases built around Oracle. Leveraging technologies such as Linux, high-end commodity processing power and Oracle RAC technology to architect, design, build and maintain database infrastructure that delivers maximum availability, reliability and performance at a fraction of traditional cost.

On a typical day, weather.com, the Web site for The Weather Channel in Atlanta, serves up between 15 million and 20 million page views. But in September 2004, when back-to-back hurricanes ransacked Florida, the peak traffic on one day more than tripled: over 70 million page views by more than 7 million unique visitors. Read the full success story now.

Marketplace