"SCOracle" Weaponizes Java

But what about other Sun open source projects?

By Brian Proffitt  Add a new comment

I'll say this for Oracle, at least they're consistently contradictory. They'll extol the virtues of their partners, then turn right around and kick them in the--well, you know--and deploy an "innovative" copy of their partner's free software.

Or they'll claim to love open source, then let a prominent open source project suffer death by ignoring.

Or they'll tout open standards, then turn around and use patents on a standard programming language, then sue one of the biggest users of that technology.

Yes, consistent indeed.

Last night, when Oracle announced it was suing Google for alleged infringement of Oracle's Java patents, my initial reaction was one of resigned realization: when Oracle bought Sun Microsystems last year, I always wondered if it was just to get control of MySQL, arguably Oracle's once-biggest potential threat. They weren't doing anything with OpenSolaris, after all, and just this week at LinuxCon, praised Linux to the heavens.

Yesterday, I realized, was the other piece of Oracle business plan: buy Sun, get Sun's Java IP, and then start shaking down as many Java implementers with deep pockets as possible. Repeat.

As programmer Joe Cheng tweeted so eloquently last night: "One word: SCOracle".

There are, of course, many learned and experienced pundits offering early analysis of this lawsuit, so I won't belabor the point. Bruce Perens asks, what about the Java patent grant? And Joel West has an excellent play-by-play on his blog, tagging this as a likely negotiation ploy.

Instead of adding my voice to the rising cacophony of dismay, I want to put the question out there that's been bothering me quite a bit as I've watched Oracle kill or weaponize components of Sun:

What's going to happen to OpenOffice.org?

The open source office suite, once owned by Sun, is now part of Oracle's stable of properties. The question then becomes, will Oracle continue to feed and care for OpenOffice.org, or will it put the project out to pasture, as it seems to be doing with OpenSolaris?

OpenOffice.org doesn't need Oracle to survive, of course, but without corporate backing to keep the project's lead developers going, OpenOffice.org, the best platform for open document standards to date, would likely suffer.

So we should ask Oracle what they plan to do with OpenOffice.org.

Then figure they'll actually do the exact opposite.

Follow Brian on Google+

Brian Proffitt is a veteran Linux and open source journalist/analyst with experience in a variety of technologies, including cloud, virtualization, and consumer devices.

ITworld LIVE

Open SourceWhite Papers & Webcasts

White Paper

CIO Quickpulse: Drivers for Enterprise Virtualization Diversification

Open source is a key driving force as organizations consider second-vendor virtualization adoption to attain more diversity, data center power and agility.

White Paper

Consolidating SAP Applications to Linux on Power by IDC

IDC studied a group of enterprises that had deployed SAP applications on IBM Power Systems servers running Linux server operating environments and had been working with those systems for several years. Learn about the results...

White Paper

An Interactive eGuide: Open Source

By now, enterprises are well aware of the benefits of open-source software, which boasts a clean design, reliability, and maintainability, as well as support for standards and community values. But perhaps the biggest benefit is quality; since open-source software users have access to source code, bug fixes and enhancements come from multiple sources, often resulting in superior software.

See more White Papers | Webcasts

Ask a question

Ask a Question