April 21, 2014, 8:44 AM — The OpenSSL Heartbleed bug is everywhere in the media these days. Did Heartbleed happen because OpenSSL lacks the resources and visionary leadership of Linux? Does OpenSSL need a Linus Torvalds to guide and promote it? The NY Times looks at the differences between Linux and OpenSSL.
According to the NY Times:
When a crucial and ubiquitous piece of security code like OpenSSL — left vulnerable for two years by the Heartbleed flaw — can be accessed by all the world’s programming muscle, but only has one full-time developer and generates less than $2,000 in donations a year, clearly something is amiss.
But then there’s Linux. Volunteers all over the world submit seven changes to Linux every hour, and millions of lines of code improvements and fixes are voluntarily added to the software every year. Over 180 major companies, including Hewlett-Packard, Oracle, IBM and Samsung, every year contribute around half a million dollars to the Linux Foundation, the nonprofit that supports the Linux system.
Image credit: NY Times
The article raises some very good points about the need for additional resources and promotion for projects like OpenSSL. Hopefully these projects will get an influx of volunteers and capital to bring them up to par with Linux. Many more people are now aware of this need, so I think we'll be seeing the community respond in a very positive and proactive way.
The media coverage of Heartbleed
I had a few thoughts of my own to share the other day about how the media has been covering Heartbleed.
According to Eye On Linux:
I think there are a couple of different things going on in the media coverage of Heartbleed.
The first can be summed up with this old saying: If it bleeds, it leads. This is the old media canard that if the news is bad then it gets front page coverage, and in the age of the Internet, that also means 24×7 coverage. Bad news is big bucks for media outlets, and if they can play up the hype then they can scare people into clicking more, thus generating more ad impressions and revenue for their companies.
The second thing that is quite noticeable is the attempt to cast blame on open source as a viable software model. In some ways I think this is more insidious than the first problem. There have always been some people that disliked open source software for one reason or another. Heartbleed provides them with the opportunity to bash open source and cast doubt on the security of open source software. But is any of their hyperbolic drivel really true?
Image credit: Eye On Linux
Chromebooks may destroy Windows on the desktop
ZDNet takes a look at the Chromebook phenomenon and thinks they may ultimately displace Windows on the business desktop.
According to ZDNet:
For years I've heard that year X is the year of the Linux desktop and I've always scoffed at it. I scoffed because it's ridiculous to think that Linux or Mac OS X or anything could supplant Windows on the desktop. That is until now. And don't get me wrong, it won't happen for at least another year in businesses but for personal computing and BYOD, it's already happening. The Linux that's taking over the desktop is called the Chrome OS and it will happen on the Chromebook device.
Frankly, I'm ready to see the ChromeOS and the Chromebook revolution. It's way overdue. When I spoke to folks from Acer a few days ago, I made the prediction to them that the Chromebooks for business revolution is about one year away—setting my sights on Fall 2015. Acer currently owns 51% of the retail Chromebook market. If I were to give someone business advice, I'd say "Gear up for the coming onslaught of business adoption of the Chromebook".
Image credit: Amazon
There's no doubt Chromebooks have become very popular, look no further than Amazon's list of the bestselling laptops and you'll find a lot of Chromebooks hitting the top of the sales charts. There's clearly a big market for Chromebooks out there, and it seems to be expanding rapidly.
I'm not sure about the author's prediction about the Chromebook impact on business by the fall of 2015. I suspect it may already be well underway, but we'll surely see Chromebooks making their way into the enterprise in ever increasing numbers over the next few years.
What's your take on all this? Tell me in the comments below.
The opinions expressed by the author do not necessarily reflect the views of ITworld.