Stage Two of Open Source Evolution
We have always said that Open Source could likely follow the evolution pattern of the PC's introduction during the mainframe era. PCs slowly "oozed" into the workplace. Lots of mistakes were made in the early stages of PC evolution, mostly by firms who tried to do it on their own and were being too careless or too creative. The landscape was littered with bad implementations, dangerous security, and more bad practices than good. Plenty of vendors were born out of necessity - making their living bouncing from client to client like ancient story-tellers moving village-to-village sharing the sacred secrets.
For those of us who believed in Open Source in the "birth" stage, we knew the day would come where nearly every firm would be using Open Source in some way. This would accomplish market "breadth", but not equate to "depth" of use. It would be the sign that we had achieved the magical second stage - The Toe Hold. This would be the segue into the third stage where Open Source will transition from an experiment to a market player. If the entire Open Source techno-sphere evolves in a cohesive way, we'll see Open Source move from just a tiny portion of the market to a significant player. What is the measure of significant player? What percentage of the market share is held by Mac or Firefox? I would consider those numbers to be the floor rather than the ceiling of success for Open Source.
Recent data from Gartner shows that we have probably achieved that second stage - stating that Open Source is present in 85% of companies.. and that the remainder expect to implement Open Source in the coming year. Though not stated, anecdotal information would support that we don't have depth of use within those companies. By all measures, though, Open Source is still moving forward on nearly all fronts; applications, network tools, operating system variants, embedded system, and more.
While we're entering the next stage where firms will gradually try to expand the use of Open Source within their firms (and may discover errors in their selected approach), the same Gartner study also cited that 69% of the firms already using Open Source have no formal use policy. Like all technologies, Open Source expansion within an enterprise will follow the natural progression through the 3 classic stages of Struggle, Control, and finally Leverage. The Gartner study shows that while some firms are entering Control, most are still in Struggle.
Firms need to understand the impacts of Open Source on company direction and value. Policies and procedures should be constructed that monitor (at a minimum) and manage (optimum). This can't be a "set it and forget it" effort that starts and ends with an executive memo. It requires a thoughtful strategy that includes operational and legal components.
Sign up for ITworld's Daily newsletter
Follow ITworld on Twitter @IT_world
jfruh
Apple syncing patent can't come soon enough
pasmith
New Twitter features borrow from 3rd party clients
Esther Schindler
Open Source Changes the Software Acquisition Process
mikelgan
How to set up continuous podcast play on the new iTunes
David Strom
Five important Windows 7 mobility features
sjvn
Guard your Wi-Fi for your own sake
Sandra Henry-Stocker
Grepping on Whole Words
Sidekick: The Good News & the Bad News
Either way you look at it Microsoft Data Center management did not follow standards or best practices in this failure. In which case it makes me wonder more about the outsourcing of corporate data much less personal data.
- mburton325
Join the conversation here
Quick, practical advice for IT pros. Made fresh daily.
Want to cash in on your IT savvy? Send your tip to tips@itworld.com. If we post it, we'll send you a $25 Amazon e-gift card.














Legal?
Legal I think you can in fact set and forget. For essentially all open source licenses, it's enough to have a policy that basically says "If you are going to actually distribute software, check with legal to make sure you are complying with the license."That's it. No other use of any software with a license that would be acknowledged by the FSF as Free Software or the OSI as meeting the Open Source Definition is going to cause any legal problems. There is nothing about legal issues with open source that requires ongoing monitoring, tuning et cetera.
the remainder expect to
the remainder expect to implement Open Source in the coming year. Though not stated, anecdotal information would support christian louboutinreplica bags
Women like jewelry replica bags as men like cars ,yet ,they are more crazy .They also like cloths ,but don't as much as replica handbags .Jewelry give more confident to them ,that why jewelry industries are so lucrative .