Microsoft/Novell: Breaking Down the Coupon Numbers

How many SUSE subscriptions can you get for $240 million?

By Brian Proffitt  9 comments

Today I read a thought-provoking article over at SD Times, which detailed the state of the partnership between Novell and Microsoft.

According to David Worthington's missive things are going pretty good for the two competitor/partners, though if you really read the piece there seems to be a key detail missing: what Microsoft is getting out of their investment in this partnership.

And what an investment it has been: an initial payment of US$348 million to Novell... with US$240 million tagged specifically for those infamous subscription certificates for SUSE Enterprise Linux to hand out or resell to interested customers. Indeed, this was the thrust of the SD Times article: that Microsoft is almost through passing these coupons out.

The thought that was actually provoked came from this sentence in the article: "A total of 475 customers have used an unspecified number of coupons, according to Microsoft."

This struck me as a very interesting figure, because after firing up XCalc, I figured out that if indeed just 475 customers have received these coupons, then Microsoft has essentially subsidized SUSE Linux Enterprise Server (SLES) deployments an average tune of US$505,263.16 per customer.

Keep in mind that while we have no idea of how many actual single- or multi-year subscriptions were actually used with these disbursements, we can get a very rough idea based on Novell's current pricing structure of how many boxes this may represent.

If we put forth the supposition that each customer purchased a single-year Standard subscription for each server, this average figure represents 632 SLES machines per customer. (For the sake of argument, let's also pre-suppose that all servers in this discussion are x86 or x86_64 boxes. This is a thought exercise, not an attempt to make our heads explode.)

Run that average number for single-year Priority subscriptions, and the number of SLES machines drops to 337 per customer.

How about with Novell's three-year subscriptions? A Standard-level multi-year plan for every box comes out to 233 servers, and the Priority plan comes out to about 125 machines per customer.

Let me emphasize that all of these numbers must be taken with a huge grain of salt: the coupon's customers are surely mixing and matching their plans for different machines; I'm only using the x86/x86_64 pricing, not Itanium and Power pricing; and Novell does offer volume pricing--so these figures are prone to huge deviations from reality.

Still, if these numbers don't put us in the ballpark of how many SLES subscriptions were deployed for Novell with Microsoft's money, they will at least get us in one of the tailgating parties outside on the parking lot.

Just as a continuation of this exercise, I thought it would be edifying to calculate how many potential server subscriptions you can get for US$240 million. The table below provides the number of SLES machines my calculator and I came up with:

  Standard Priority
One-Year Subscription 300,375 160,106
Three-Year Subscription 111,111 59,259

So, depending on the types of subscriptions actually used, Microsoft may have paid for roughly 60,000-300,000 SLES subscriptions--likely even more if Novell applied volume discounts.

This inaccuracy of these figures precludes us from drawing any big conclusions. But it is interesting to get a peek behind the curtain and see just what kind of deployment numbers this partnership may have produced. It certainly seems like more than a token number.

Follow Brian on Google+

Brian Proffitt is a veteran Linux and open source journalist/analyst with experience in a variety of technologies, including cloud, virtualization, and consumer devices.

9 comments

    Anonymous 2 years ago
    Our client's company is proof that not all of these subscriptions are shelfware -- we bought 500 SLES licenses from Microsoft with a 3yr subscription, and we have roughly 400 of them in production right now.
    Anonymous 2 years ago
    Novell shared on their July earnings call that they have not renewed any MSFT coupons with customers suggesting that the vast majority are shelf-ware designed to facilitate MSFT increased Windows sales while mitigating regulatory scrutiny.
    Anonymous 2 years ago
    These sound like legitimate sales. Remember Novell is in the top two enterprise linux sellers. Many customers may have found a new use for SLED. And Novell is a name that many IT shops still respect (and they hold on to their Netware servers to prove it). Having a Microsoft sales rep come around to sell them a Novell license may have been the icing on the cake to get them to install a linux server...maybe if only just as a stable secure file server.In the coming years, renewing and additional customers will provide a solid revenue base for Novell to replace its Netware revenue.
    Anonymous 2 years ago in reply to Anonymous
    ...there is a real problem with this train of thought. Netware servers are past end-of-support, and therefore Novell earns nothing from their continued use. Further, the entry of Microsoft (SCCM) and the continued strong lead of Symantec (Altiris) in the desktop application and PC deployment industry has really hit the Novell Zenwork/ZCM current use and future potential. An aside to that, we just demoed all three products and the Novell product was far and away the worst. They've dropped eDirectory in favor of tying themselves to Microsoft AD for their products. Everything points to Novell being in a decline-of-the-Roman-Empire lifestage. I don't doubt we'll see them bought out within the next couple years. By Microsoft? Sun? IBM? Someone else? I don't have a strong opinion on this, but I suspect that is much more likely than regrowth or them just fading away.
    Anonymous 2 years ago
    If you go back and look at the original announcement, it told you roughly how many subscriptions the deal was for: 70,000.http://online.wsj.com/public/article/SB116249026689311557-helTbrheLKgbaJ5iO5z40ZFCiOs_20061109.html?mod=blogs
    Anonymous 2 years ago in reply to Anonymous
    What Microsoft got out of it was Moonlight.
    Anonymous 2 years ago
    The purpose of Microsoft's engagement with Novell was to placate the European Union who were gunning after Microsoft for their - alleged - anti-competitive practices. The EU had reached the conclusion that Microsoft had largely (and illegally) wiped out most of (Europe's) software industry and was actually in the business of now gouging its corporations and citizens for billions of dollars every year. SUSE - being formerly a German owned Linux developer.. and the No 1 distribution in Europe - was specifically targeted by Microsoft in an attempt to mitigate the enormous pressure they were under to prove they had become more 'inter-operable'. Thus the 'inter-operability' agreement with Novel/SUSE so as to prove itself a good corporate citizen and placate the EU about it intentions to 'open up'.... and to provide forward supporting evidence seeking to protect Microsoft from further efforts by the EU to prosecute them for - alleged - monopolistic practices. Also, Novell is no doberman of the technology marketplace. More like a toothless old labrador staying warm by the fire before quietly passing away. As such, it was also a safe bet by Microsoft as it was unlikely that such an agreement would come back and bite them.Microsoft has largely distributed the certificates at massive discounts (that is, onsold them for a remarkably cheaper price than even they bought them for) and I surmise that the majority of SUSE certificates distributed by Microsoft have become shelf-ware... with perhaps as little as 25% of the total actually deployed in production environments.
    Anonymous 2 years ago in reply to Anonymous
    Cry me a river, Microsoft Novell bad, dead.Dude, get a life.
    bproffitt
    bproffitt 2 years ago in reply to Anonymous
    I would concede that Microsoft may have indeed sold them for a heavily discounted prices, in which case the numbers I am speculating about could be even higher.I question the notion that these could be shelfware. I suppose it's possible, but spending $240 million just to keep a competitor's servers off the market seems a very poor investment. Their money would be better spent on a big marketing campaign like Get the--wait, that didn't work so well, either...The real problem with all of this speculation is that right now we don't know how many coupons were actually handed out... only what Redmond paid for them.Thanks for the comments!

      Add a comment

      Post a comment using one of these accounts
      Or join now
      At least 6 characters

      Note: Comment will appear soon after you have activated your account.
      Obscene/spam comments will be removed and accounts suspended.
      The information you submit is subject to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

      ITworld LIVE

      Open SourceWhite Papers & Webcasts

      White Paper

      Consolidating SAP Applications to Linux on Power by IDC

      IDC studied a group of enterprises that had deployed SAP applications on IBM Power Systems servers running Linux server operating environments and had been working with those systems for several years. Learn about the results...

      White Paper

      An Interactive eGuide: Open Source

      By now, enterprises are well aware of the benefits of open-source software, which boasts a clean design, reliability, and maintainability, as well as support for standards and community values. But perhaps the biggest benefit is quality; since open-source software users have access to source code, bug fixes and enhancements come from multiple sources, often resulting in superior software.

      See more White Papers | Webcasts

      Answers - Powered by ITworld

      Ask a question

      Ask a Question