Operating systems

Snow Leopard fixes Expose

4 comments | 5I like it!
September 2, 2009, 11:10 PM — 

Here is a shameful confession for a Mac user/cultist: I've almost never used Expose. It is, I know, a great concept, which many people have come to rely on. As someone who keeps far too many applications running and windows open at once, and who sometimes gets frustrated looking for the right one, I ought to be the target market for it. Yet the implementation never quite felt natural to me. My pointer always seemed to find its way to the hot corners unbidden, irritating me often enough that I just turned them off. And I never did quite get the hang of using the function keys for this purpose; I'm a pretty a good touch-typer, but if it's a key that wasn't in the keyboarding class that was taught in my senior year of high school, I haven't been able to develop a feel for it. I ended up sort of stabbing at the area of the keyboard where the Expose keys lie, with middling results, and quickly gave up on that too.

The biggest problem, for me, was that there was no obvious connection between flitting my mouse to one corner of the screen and/or pressing one of your higher-numbered Function keys on the one hand and doing the nifty UI stuff Expose does on the other. True, pretty much all interactions you have with a computer are arbitrary to some extent, but I had a hard time making this particular connection.

And now, thanks to the modifications to Expose in Snow Leopard, I don't have to. The bit of Expose functionality I always found most tempting -- to have all the windows of a single functionality available at once -- can now be invoked by clicking and holding on that application's icon in the dock. That's the sort of connection between on-screen graphic and conceptual action that makes sense to me, and that feel typically, well, Mac-y. It's still something I have to sort of consciously to add to my workflow -- old habits die hard -- but it's becoming more instinctive as the days with the new OS go on. It's pretty much worth the $29 by itself, as far as I'm concerned.

Sign up for ITworld's Daily newsletter
Follow ITworld on Twitter @IT_world

I like it!
Comments

Downgrade

The multitouch functionality on the unibody Macs made Expose an incredible, must have feature. A far as I'm concerned 10.6 has ruined the feature. The sizing and spacing of the windows is awkward and inefficient. I do like the addition of the "Dock clicking" feature but I can't stand the new design to the point where I am considering wiping my hard drive and reinstalling Leopard.
| reply

Definitely worse than before.

While the hold-on-dock feature is awesome, as the previous commenter said, the sizing and spacing and gridifying of the windows is awkward and disproportionate. Small windows are made inappropriately large, and large windows are made illegibly small. Plus there's that ugly blue border... I wish there was a way to go back to the old Leopard Exposé, or a switch, or something.

If you also feel this way, please let Apple know: http://www.apple.com/feedback/macosx.html
| reply

Agree

With the old expose you could guess where the shrunken windows will be, and usually click them before they stopped moving. The new expose wastes space and looks like some Windows feature. I like the linkage from the dock too, but the gridded layout sucks. The blue glow does look naff compared to the subtle highlight on the old expose but its not a bigger problem as the ctappy grid layout.
| reply
peer-to-peer

Brian Proffitt
Microsoft/Novell: Breaking Down the Coupon Numbers

Esther Schindler
Drupal's Dries Buytaert on Building the Next Drupal

Tom Henderson
Top Ten General Operating Systems Rants

pasmith
PS3 motion controller delayed; goes up against Project Natal

sjvn
Neolithic Windows security hole alive and well in Windows 7

claird
Perl source code comparison makes for good reading

mikelgan
Cell phones don't create stress or interrupt much

Sandra Henry-Stocker
How to: The Unix Interview

 

Where Google Chrome security fails: the password
I heard mention that the Chrome OS will have some sort of encryption available a la bitlocker. If it's possible to encrypt personal data using another password or key, then it may have potential for very secure data.... And Ubuntu has an 'encrypt home directory' option, perhaps google should follow suit.
- Dann

Join the conversation here

The Daily Tip

The Daily TipQuick, practical advice for IT pros. Made fresh daily.

Hot tips:

Want to cash in on your IT savvy? Send your tip to tips@itworld.com. If we post it, we'll send you a $25 Amazon e-gift card.

Newsletters

Subscribe to ITWORLD TODAY and receive the latest IT news and analysis.

I would like to receive offers via email from ITworld partners.
By clicking submit you agree to the terms and conditions outlined in ITworld's privacy policy.
Marketplace