Great and Disappointing Operating Systems of the Decade
We loved them, we hated them, we nursed them in the wee hours...
Writing about the best and worst in operating system is like a crap magnet: I'm pressing the big red button. People develop a personal relationship with operating systems, whether on servers or their personal machine or phone. The love/hate relationship becomes anchored with deep emotions about the merits/detractions of the devices they use-- through the lenses of operating systems.
Great in this case means possibly really great, and alternatively, really awful. Some made us happy. Others made us sad, or worse, mad. Some we toiled happily with the winners, while others burned up precious weekend time in fits of compatibility issues, installation nightmares, and startling kernel traps and various blue/black/red screens of death. Some deserved to become dumpster fodder, and others are still humming away, quietly, and doing their job. This is about both kinds.
Disappointing
Windows Millennium Edition (WinME)
This was the last version of Microsoft Windows that ran on top of Microsoft DOS, and it wasn't well-designed. Microsoft released it as a stop gap version to address slightly more memory and disk before the two Windows code bases would be merged together into Windows 2000 client and server editions. Technically, it arrived late in the 1990's, but its inclusion here is to remember the pain of the name.
Windows Vista
Initially, it was boasted that Vista would be the most costliest-ever operating system to develop, and the results were uniformly disastrous. Confusion over what hardware characteristics would be needed to run Vista, lack and dearth of appropriate hardware drivers, OEM confusion, perceived (generally untrue) software compatibility issues, and vastly mixed messages caused this operating system to be avoided by most businesses, and used mostly by hapless consumers who had no choice when they bought a system. Although an architecturally safer system then predecessor Windows XP, Windows XP SP2 heralded an similar architectural change to Vista that demoted the user from root, and stanched Windows security problems, although certainly not altogether.
NetWare 6.5
The world was looking for the joiner of Novell's time-honored and rock-solid NetWare network operating system to be joined fully to Linux. Novell had just purchased SuSE Linux and it looked as though the world might have a powerhouse to rival the initial foibles of Microsoft's then-embryonic Active Directory. Would eDirectory become a rival and gain authentication market share. Today, that goal is an unfulfilled dream for most.
Windows Mobile
The 'smartphone' hardware genre changed everything.
Sign up for ITworld's Daily newsletter
Follow ITworld on Twitter @ITworld
Brian Proffitt
openSUSE: Not for sale today
pasmith
Two new sources fuel the Verizon iPhone rumor mill
sjvn
The Corporation has gone Open Source
Mike Elgan
What to do with your Google 'Social Circle'
Sandra Henry-Stocker
Unix How To: Give me that old-time security!
Dan Tynan
What's worse than privacy legislation? No privacy legislation

The IFA consumer electronics exhibition turns 50
Albert Einstein opened the 7th Great German Radio and Phonograph Show, the forerunner to today's IFA, in Berlin in 1930. The show marked the public debut of a prototype 'television receiver.' Since then, some products, like the 3DTV, were ahead of their time. Others, like the MiniDisc...well, just never got off the ground. Here's a look at IFA's storied past.
IFA 2010
Samsung launches Galaxy Tab
3D content is king at giant tech show
PlayStation 3 will be ready for 3D by October
Sony announces music service, hints at TV service
Google's Schmidt to speak at Berlin show
3D, tablets galore expected at consumer electronics show





Server 2008?????
Rewriting the interface to make it a Vista clone is typical MS arrogance and lack of customer care. It may be more secure, but the interface rewrite is a massive "up yours" to geeks everywhere. FAIL!Does 'Vista' count as a
Does 'Vista' count as a swear word?BSD and Linux "capitulated" to Windows? Really?
"The technical innovations never capitulated to Microsoft Windows, and so unlike Linux and BSD developments, Solaris has become open and comparatively 'free'."There are more than a few Debian and OpenBSD users who'd get a kick out of that. Oh, and FreeBSD and NetBSD users too.