The Portable Office: The best way to get online

1 comment | 4I like it!
July 23, 2008, 04:11 PM —  Macworld.com — 

For many of us who travel and want to get online from the road, Wi-Fi hotspots alone just don't cut it. There aren't enough of them, they aren't always available where you want them, and they can be a security nightmare. There is a better alternative: cellular data service from the same wireless carriers who connect our cell phones.

The advantage of cellular data service is its ubiquity. Like cellular voice service, it's based on networks of base stations that are located in most cities and airports and along most major highways in the United States. That means you can get online at near-broadband speeds in most metropolitan areas, and at slow but still usable rates in less-traveled and less-populated places.

Until recently, the biggest problem with cellular data service was that few of the carriers offered good Mac support; Verizon was long the main exception. But that has gradually been changing: all the major carriers now make it much easier for Macs to get online, too.

This means that for most mobile Mac users, a cellular data plan is now the best--if not the least expensive--way to get online from the road. But which carrier's service should you choose? Here's how they compare.

The Carriers

AT&T, Sprint, and Verizon each offer speedy, third-generation cellular data networks in the United States (see our cell data glossary). Sprint and Verizon claim downstream rates from 600 Kbps to 1.4 Mbps; AT&T, from 700 Kbps to 1.7 Mbps; all three can reach peak speeds of more than 2 Mbps. Going the other way, Verizon and Sprint claim upstream rates of 500 to 800 Kbps; AT&T, from 500 Kbps to 1.2 Mbps.

Those claims aren't too far wrong. In informal testing, our colleagues at Computerworld found that downloads averaged around 500 to 750 Kbps, peaking around 1.2 to 1.6 Mbps, while uploads were about 230 to 480 Kbps. In my own informal testing with a new Sprint adapter card, I actually hit a peak of 2.4 Mbps for one download.

All three services provide roughly comparable coverage. Of the three, AT&T is lagging furthest behind: It has full service in 275 of the 350 top metropolitan markets, and plans to finish rolling out service in the remaining 75 this year. When you roam beyond the reach of the 3G network, service drops back to whatever last-generation cellular data network that carrier used; as a result, your speed will drop more precipitously on Verizon's and Sprint's networks than on AT&T's.

T-Mobile is lagging behind the other big national carriers: While the company just launched a 3G network in New York City, it has only an intermediate 2.5G network--EDGE--in the United States. (EDGE is the middle-speed network used by the first-generation iPhone.) T-Mobile is also alone among the Big Four in not offering cell-data options for Mac owners; it offers just a single PC Card, with no Mac drivers or software.

The Plans

The cost of 3G service depends on your carrier's

I like it!
Comments

I have been using wireless

I have been using wireless broadband for over 8 mounths. It has some very good upside and very bad downside. If you can hit a 3G netwirk it works great. I live 1 1/2 miles from a cell tower. The service was very good to start with, the maps showed I am in a marginal 3G area. The closest 3G I could find was over 8 miles away. Suggest checking out your area thourghly during the free cancellation peroid. My service on that carrier dropped to a nominal 1 to 2 kb after eight mounths. I ended up eating the cancellation fee. (Not fair for lack of service). I still have cell phone service from them and it seems to be getting worse.
| reply
Resources
White Paper

Symantec Backup Exec 12 and Backup Exec System Recovery 8 deliver industry leading Windows data protection and system recovery. Download this whitepaper to find out the top reasons to upgrade and how to get continuous data protection and complete system recovery.

Webcast

Data and system loss — from a hard drive failure, malicious attack, natural disaster, or simple human error — can happen anytime. Don’t leave your business vulnerable. Make sure you have a secure recovery strategy in place. Symantec's latest backup and system recovery technology can efficiently restore critical applications, individual emails and documents and even restore your entire system in minutes in the event of a loss.

White Paper

Businesses face a growing challenge to ensure that the IT environment is properly protected. Backup Exec 12 integrates with other applications in the Symantec family of products, to complement your current data protection strategy, keep your data securely backed up and make it recoverable when you need it most.

Free stuff

Enterprise 2.0 Implementation
By Aaron C. Newman, Jeremy Thomas
Published by McGraw-Hill
Learn more!

Deploying Cisco Wide Area Application Services
By Zach Seils, Joel Christner
Published by Cisco Press
Learn more!

Featured Sponsor

AISO founders envisioned a Web hosting company that was environmentally friendly. While the company employed energy-efficient innovations like solar panels, its infrastructure produced unacceptable power and cooling requirements. Find out how AISO leveraged AMD technology to overcome their challenge in this case study white paper.

In this whitepaper, Scalar explores the opportunity to change the landscape with respect to mission critical databases built around Oracle. Leveraging technologies such as Linux, high-end commodity processing power and Oracle RAC technology to architect, design, build and maintain database infrastructure that delivers maximum availability, reliability and performance at a fraction of traditional cost.

On a typical day, weather.com, the Web site for The Weather Channel in Atlanta, serves up between 15 million and 20 million page views. But in September 2004, when back-to-back hurricanes ransacked Florida, the peak traffic on one day more than tripled: over 70 million page views by more than 7 million unique visitors. Read the full success story now.

More Resources