Why a touchscreen BlackBerry is needed now

July 24, 2008, 02:11 PM — 

After using the iPhone 3G for the past few weeks and watching others doing the same thing, it quickly became apparent that the true nature of this industry doesn’t revolve around the fact that a certain product is unique or that it’s even on a good carrier.

Instead, for the average person who doesn’t spend time reading tech blogs and probably doesn’t care too much about the specs of a product wants to know one thing when comparing a BlackBerry to an iPhone: which is cooler?

Now I know that it’s difficult to simply downplay the desires of the less tech-savvy, but it’s true. How many times have you asked your mother and father if they want a specific smartphone because of its support for 3G and push email, only to stare back at a confused face that doesn’t understand what you’re saying?

Probably more times than you can count.

But when you get those same people in the store where they’re forced to make a decision between the BlackBerry flavor of the month or the iPhone 3G, chances are, they’re going to pick Apple’s phone for two reasons: hype and aesthetics.

Maybe I’m over-simplifying the process and people are looking for other things in their cell phones, but either way, it doesn’t matter. When you look at a BlackBerry with an app store, push contacts and calendars, and stellar business integration, you quickly realize that the iPhone 3G now offers the same options. And for around the same price, you’re forced to choose based on the main differences between the two products, assuming you’re willing to work with AT&T. And the way I see it, it’s the touchscreen and the perceived “futuristic” appeal of the iPhone 3G that puts it over the top.

And although it may not want to admit it and it usually likes to say that a touchscreen isn’t the best solution for using a smartphone, RIM is desperate to get a touchscreen BlackBerry out the door. And the company's long-rumored BlackBerry Thunder is probably one of its worst kept secrets.

The touchscreen device will ostensibly offer the same functionality you already see in the iPhone and is prime evidence that RIM fully understands that when sitting next to the iPhone at the AT&T store, its BlackBerry looks woefully inept, regardless of whether it is or not.

So if RIM understands that the touchscreen really is the future, it needs to make sure the Thunder hits store shelves as soon as possible. Rampant speculation suggests that it’ll be a Verizon Wireless exclusive, which could help differentiate the two products, but will it be enough to justify the changeover from Apple to RIM?

No one knows.

But if nothing else, RIM needs to be made aware that time is running out and the longer its BlackBerry looks like the second-rate iPhone, the sooner Apple will solidify itself in the enterprise space.

RIM needs to act now, officially announce the Thunder, and get ready to confront the iPhone on its own turf. If it doesn’t, there could be some trouble ahead for RIM.

Sign up for ITworld's Daily newsletter
Follow ITworld on Twitter @IT_world

I like it!
Comments

Personally, I'd say that

Personally, I'd say that blackberry really has the upper hand here. regardless if the thunder only has lukewarm acceptance they have the potential to cut into apple's market. Something Apple was unable to do to RIM. UBS Investment research determined that the effect of the iphone on the blackberry market was very insignificant, now RIM can fire back with a product that could interest current users and even bring in newer, younger users. something they obviously tried with the pearl.
| reply

Just picked up my new iphone

Just picked up my new iphone today and must admit it is very cool. except...

1) i almost crashed my car, because unlike my Blackberry, I could not just hit a speed dial without looking at the phone.

2) I have had 5 dropped calls in the first 5 hours of owning the phone in NYC.

3) Unlike the Blackberry, You can only program in 1 pop email account to push to the iphone. Sure I could forward to another account, but i dont want to.

I would love to keep this phone. But truth be told, AT&T and the I Phone suck as a paired unit. I will just keep my 8830 and ipod touch and wait for the new verizon blackberry.

| reply
peer-to-peer

jfruh
Apple syncing patent can't come soon enough

pasmith
New Twitter features borrow from 3rd party clients

Esther Schindler
Open Source Changes the Software Acquisition Process

mikelgan
How to set up continuous podcast play on the new iTunes

David Strom
Five important Windows 7 mobility features

sjvn
Guard your Wi-Fi for your own sake                        

Sandra Henry-Stocker
Grepping on Whole Words

 

Sidekick: The Good News & the Bad News
Either way you look at it Microsoft Data Center management did not follow standards or best practices in this failure. In which case it makes me wonder more about the outsourcing of corporate data much less personal data.
- mburton325

Join the conversation here

The Daily Tip

The Daily TipQuick, practical advice for IT pros. Made fresh daily.

Hot tips:

Want to cash in on your IT savvy? Send your tip to tips@itworld.com. If we post it, we'll send you a $25 Amazon e-gift card.

Newsletters

Subscribe to ITWORLD TODAY and receive the latest IT news and analysis.

I would like to receive offers via email from ITworld partners.
By clicking submit you agree to the terms and conditions outlined in ITworld's privacy policy.
Featured Sponsor

AISO founders envisioned a Web hosting company that was environmentally friendly. While the company employed energy-efficient innovations like solar panels, its infrastructure produced unacceptable power and cooling requirements. Find out how AISO leveraged AMD technology to overcome their challenge in this case study white paper.

In this whitepaper, Scalar explores the opportunity to change the landscape with respect to mission critical databases built around Oracle. Leveraging technologies such as Linux, high-end commodity processing power and Oracle RAC technology to architect, design, build and maintain database infrastructure that delivers maximum availability, reliability and performance at a fraction of traditional cost.

On a typical day, weather.com, the Web site for The Weather Channel in Atlanta, serves up between 15 million and 20 million page views. But in September 2004, when back-to-back hurricanes ransacked Florida, the peak traffic on one day more than tripled: over 70 million page views by more than 7 million unique visitors. Read the full success story now.

Marketplace