Not Using 'Best' VMware Features is Expensive

By Edward L. Haletky, CIO.com |  Virtualization, VMware Add a new comment

Judging by blogs and associated discussions on CIO.com, many industry pundits and those investigating virtualization don't fully understand the direct costs associated with using virtualization software; specifically when they choose not to use enhancement tools such as VMware vMotion, VMware SVMotion, VMware HA and DRS.

In one sense they're not absolute requirements: it's possible to manage a virtual infrastructure without them; they may not be necessary in every environment.

But not using them can increase your own costs and the level of your risk.

Even considering the relatively high price of some of these options, using them will increase the stability and uptime of your virtualized systems in the long run.

Take VMware's vMotion as an example: Without vMotion, if you needed to work on a physical host for virtualized servers, you would need to turn off/shutdown all VMs, fast-migrate them to another host, and then boot them on the new host.

In general, your minimal downtime would be the length of time it takes to reboot a virtualized server (on average we could safely say this will be roughly three to five minutes per VM. With 50 VMs this adds up quickly.) However, since this is a reboot of the server, all this activity would have to happen after regular business hours or be scheduled during non-critical times.

After-hours work comes with a cost premium, mainly from overtime and comp time and other considerations for the staff involved. The cost of vendor hardware technicians or technical support is higher after hours than during normal hours of operation in your area of the world.

With vMotion it is possible to save costs by doing this work during normal business hours, eliminating both the added costs and scheduling issues involved with off-hours migrations.

VMware's SVMotion can save the same kinds of costs for the same reasons when a SAN or iSCSI server firmware needs to be upgraded. Rather than shutting anything down or keeping staff working late, you can just do the work during normal operating hours.

VMware HA automates failover of hosts so that there is no need to have extended downtimes while VMware DRS employs vMotion to move VMs to hosts with more unused capacity. Now tie in VMware DPM (Distributed Power Management), which is experimental but not for long, it is even possible to shutdown hosts on off hours, saving on power costs.

In addition, these tools will allow you to minimize downtime which could cost you penalties for not meeting your Service Level Agreements.

Before nay-saying the use of these tools, sum up the costs and see if you will benefit from them. Compare the cost of buying, learning and implementing the tools to the amount of downtime, overtime, after-hours support and power costs you can save by using them.

    Add a comment

    Post a comment using one of these accounts
    Or join now
    At least 6 characters

    Note: Comment will appear soon after you have activated your account.
    Obscene/spam comments will be removed and accounts suspended.
    The information you submit is subject to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

    ITworld LIVE

    VirtualizationWhite Papers & Webcasts

    White Paper

    AppAssure vs Backup Exec

    In this new Lab Report, openBench Labs examines AppAssure backup and replication software v4.7 with Symantec Backup Exec 2010 R2. AppAssure implements changed-block tracking technology to provide data protection for both virtual and physical servers in specific OS environments. In contrast, Backup Exec 2010 R2 uses traditional file-based backup to promote compatibility with the largest number of operating systems.

    White Paper

    Top 5 Requirements for Backup of Virtual and Physical Servers - Greg Shields, Microsoft MVP

    Reports by leading industry analysts like Gartner, IDC and Concentrated Technology suggest virtual servers in 2011 will eclipse physical servers in total server deployments. The majority of today's business computing environments already have both virtual and physical servers at the same time.

    White Paper

    Lab Report - Optimizing VM Backup for VMware and Hyper-V

    Data centers are becoming more difficult to manage and protect as more data and applications are moved into virtual environments. Adding fuel to the fire, CIOs must now deal with corporate mandates to build an IT infrastructure that scales to unknown demand levels and provides service assurance for fluctuating conditions that cannot be accurately projected. The solution is a transition to a private cloud characterized by a hypervisor-independent Virtual Infrastructure (VI).

    Webcast On Demand

    Managing Enterprise Mobility Costs

    Mobile employees, especially those traveling internationally, were spending time and resources finding and making connections. Roaming costs were out of control. The IT Administrator at The Hay Group tells you how he got more control over these costs, providing management with predictable budgets and insights while ensuring employee productivity.

    Sponsor: iPass

    White Paper

    Forrester Total Economic Impact (TEI) Case Study - Oracle

    In this paper, Forrester Consulting examines the total economic impact and potential return on investment (ROI) realized by three Enterprise organizations as they virtualized mission-critical Oracle databases on the VMware vSphere platform. The purpose of this study is to provide readers with a framework to evaluate the potential financial impact of VMware vSphere on their organizations.

    See more White Papers | Webcasts

    Ask a question

    Ask a Question