VMware's ESXi will cost you if not secured properly

By Edward L. Haletky, CIO.com |  Virtualization, VMware, VMware ESXi Add a new comment

Now that ESXi has been released for free, it is even more important to concentrate on how to secure this version of ESX. Lowering the cost will undoubtedly increase the number of users in small- and mid-sized companies, and in the enterprise as well.

Despite a design that calls for it to be pre-installed or embedded, I have blogged before that ESXi shouldn't be treated only as an appliance, especially as regards security. Additional hardening steps are required to make it reasonably secure.

There are very good guides out there now to harden the GNU/Linux service console specifically the Defense Information Systems Agency's Secure Technology Installation Guide ( DISA/STIG) and CIS Security Benchmark which both reference the UNIX and Linux guides respectively as a basis for ESX.

The guides concentrate on a subset of the entire virtual environment which includes ESX, and the VMs, but is not limited to them.

However, the descriptions of what the guides actually cover are imprecise enough that one reader may think they cover only ESX and others will think they cover everything about VM security. But that is another discussion.

The 'Console' for ESXi is an implementation of the Posix variant of Unix within a Busybox framework, and it has many features that you will find in the full blown GNU/Linux service console, including Pluggable Authentication Modules, usernames and passwords, and daemons like Secure Shells (SSH). While enabling SSH within ESXi is not recommended by me nor supported by VMware, I imagine it is enabled on a majority of installs.

This implies now that the hardening guidelines for SSH should be now used, as well as anything related directly to PAM modules, users, and passwords.

But since with SSH enabled users can login to the system, we now need to be concerned about file permissions, and in advertent information leakage about virtual machines, and the system itself.

While ESXi is sold as an appliance and has some hardening guidelines from VMware, the Busybox'Console' should also be hardened as well using standard GNU/Linux hardening guidelines specifically adjusted for ESXi.

Virtualization expert Edward L. Haletky is the author of "VMWare ESX Server in the Enterprise: Planning and Securing Virtualization Servers," Pearson Education (2008.) He recently left Hewlett-Packard, where he worked in the Virtualization, Linux, and High-Performance Technical Computing teams. Haletky owns AstroArch Consulting, providing virtualization, security, and network consulting and development. Haletky is also a champion and moderator for the VMware discussion forums, providing answers to security and configuration questions.

    Add a comment

    Post a comment using one of these accounts
    Or join now
    At least 6 characters

    Note: Comment will appear soon after you have activated your account.
    Obscene/spam comments will be removed and accounts suspended.
    The information you submit is subject to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

    ITworld LIVE

    VirtualizationWhite Papers & Webcasts

    White Paper

    AppAssure vs Backup Exec

    In this new Lab Report, openBench Labs examines AppAssure backup and replication software v4.7 with Symantec Backup Exec 2010 R2. AppAssure implements changed-block tracking technology to provide data protection for both virtual and physical servers in specific OS environments. In contrast, Backup Exec 2010 R2 uses traditional file-based backup to promote compatibility with the largest number of operating systems.

    White Paper

    Top 5 Requirements for Backup of Virtual and Physical Servers - Greg Shields, Microsoft MVP

    Reports by leading industry analysts like Gartner, IDC and Concentrated Technology suggest virtual servers in 2011 will eclipse physical servers in total server deployments. The majority of today's business computing environments already have both virtual and physical servers at the same time.

    White Paper

    Lab Report - Optimizing VM Backup for VMware and Hyper-V

    Data centers are becoming more difficult to manage and protect as more data and applications are moved into virtual environments. Adding fuel to the fire, CIOs must now deal with corporate mandates to build an IT infrastructure that scales to unknown demand levels and provides service assurance for fluctuating conditions that cannot be accurately projected. The solution is a transition to a private cloud characterized by a hypervisor-independent Virtual Infrastructure (VI).

    Webcast On Demand

    Managing Enterprise Mobility Costs

    Mobile employees, especially those traveling internationally, were spending time and resources finding and making connections. Roaming costs were out of control. The IT Administrator at The Hay Group tells you how he got more control over these costs, providing management with predictable budgets and insights while ensuring employee productivity.

    Sponsor: iPass

    White Paper

    Forrester Total Economic Impact (TEI) Case Study - Oracle

    In this paper, Forrester Consulting examines the total economic impact and potential return on investment (ROI) realized by three Enterprise organizations as they virtualized mission-critical Oracle databases on the VMware vSphere platform. The purpose of this study is to provide readers with a framework to evaluate the potential financial impact of VMware vSphere on their organizations.

    See more White Papers | Webcasts

    Ask a question

    Ask a Question