Broadband group: Some P-to-P blocking reasonable

Broadband providers are engaging in reasonable network management when they
slow their customers' access to P-to-P (peer-to-peer) networks, a representative
of the cable industry told U.S. lawmakers Tuesday.

"There is a legitimate issue at times of peak congestion," said Kyle
McSlarrow, president and CEO of the National
Cable and Telecommunications Association (NCTA), a trade group representing
cable television and broadband providers. "The vast majority of that traffic
is going to be peer-to-peer, and it's not irrelevant that the vast majority
of peer-to-peer traffic will, in fact, be pirated content."

One legislator asked McSlarrow whether NCTA member Comcast was engaging in
acceptable network management when it decided to slow
customer connections to P-to-P protocol BitTorrent, a practice revealed
by the Associated Press last October. Comcast has said it slowed BitTorrent
traffic during times of peak network use, but U.S. Federal Communications Commission
Chairman Kevin Martin said last month that Comcast blocking appeared to be widespread.

When cable broadband providers limit subscribers' P-to-P traffic, it is "a
reasonable method of not just managing traffic, but more importantly, ensuring
that all the other consumers you are serving get a superior experience,"
McSlarrow told the House of Representatives Subcommittee on Telecommunications
and the Internet.

For many broadband providers, a small minority of subscribers using P-to-P
services take up most of the bandwidth, McSlarrow said.

McSlarrow's comments came during a subcommittee hearing on the Internet
Freedom Preservation Act, a bill that makes net neutrality U.S. policy.
The bill says it's U.S. policy to allow Internet users to access the legal content
and devices of their choosing and to prevent "unreasonable discriminatory
favoritism for, or degradation of, content by network operators."

The bill would also require the FCC start an investigation into whether broadband
providers are following net neutrality recommendations and what rules are needed.

McSlarrow and other opponents of the bill said it's unnecessary and could discourage
broadband providers from investing in network improvements. There's enough broadband
competition in the U.S. to prevent providers from blocking or slowing Web content,
and the FCC could take action against discriminatory practices on a case-by-case
basis, some Republican members of the subcommittee said.

Sign up for ITworld's Daily newsletter
Follow ITworld on Twitter @IT_world

• Email
• Print
• Share
  • Slashdot
  • Digg
  • Stumble
  • Reddit
  • Newsvine