iPod mystery chip sparks DRM rumor
Gentlemen, start your tinfoil hats! Apple's new iPod Shuffle moves the control buttons from the player onto its earbud cable. Tech enthusiasts who dismantled the control unit have found a mystery chip, marked 8A83E3. What does it do?
Truth is, no one knows -- except for Apple and its manufacturing partners. But bloggers at Boing Boing and iLounge are convinced it's an "authentication chip" whose job is to verify to the iPod that the headphone cable is either from Apple, or from a licensed third-party maker such as Etymotic, whose ER-6i earbuds are a popular iPod upgrade.
If the new Shuffle really does check for the presence of an authentication chip, it will raise the prices of replacement earbuds, both by adding the authentication hardware and, presumably, by requiring earbud makers to pay a license fee to Apple that allows them to do so. In return, third-party hardware makers get to protect their profit margins by locking out cheapo competitors.
The result for Shuffle buyers -- presumably -- is that any earbuds they already own won't work with the new Shuffle, even with an adapter that contains the control buttons.
But it's hard for me to take bloggers' overreactions seriously. iLounge editor-in-chief Jeremy Horwitz says this isn't just an annoyance, it's a nightmare!
This is, in short, a nightmare scenario for long-time iPod fans: are we entering a world in which Apple controls and taxes literally every piece of the iPod purchase from headphones to chargers, jacking up their prices, forcing customers to re-purchase things they already own, while making only marginal improvements in their functionality? It's a shame, and one that consumers should feel empowered to fight.
I'm having trouble working up the foam around my mouth. I wonder how many people who buy the new Shuffle will actually have a different set of earbuds they want to plug into it? Even then, for many this will be a convenient excuse to buy newer earbuds.
Electronic Frontier Foundation lawyer Fred von Lohmann has the best take on the mystery chip: "Why have so many of the reviews of iPods failed to notice the proliferation of these Apple authentication chips?" Good question, because if Microsoft did the exact same thing, the Internet would be on fire by now.
» posted by ITworld staff
The Industry Standard
Sign up for ITworld's Daily newsletter
Follow ITworld on Twitter @IT_world
On Twitter now
ipod shuffle
Powered by TwitterOn Twitter now
ipod shuffle
Brian Proffitt
Microsoft/Novell: Breaking Down the Coupon Numbers
Esther Schindler
Drupal's Dries Buytaert on Building the Next Drupal
Tom Henderson
Top Ten General Operating Systems Rants
pasmith
PS3 motion controller delayed; goes up against Project Natal
sjvn
Neolithic Windows security hole alive and well in Windows 7
claird
Perl source code comparison makes for good reading
mikelgan
Cell phones don't create stress or interrupt much
Sandra Henry-Stocker
How to: The Unix Interview
Where Google Chrome security fails: the password
I heard mention that the Chrome OS will have some sort of encryption available a la bitlocker. If it's possible to encrypt personal data using another password or key, then it may have potential for very secure data.... And Ubuntu has an 'encrypt home directory' option, perhaps google should follow suit.
- Dann
Join the conversation here
Quick, practical advice for IT pros. Made fresh daily.
- Ubuntu advances: Why Ubuntu server installations will surge in 2010
- Social media marketing: How to make friends with benefits
- More...
Want to cash in on your IT savvy? Send your tip to tips@itworld.com. If we post it, we'll send you a $25 Amazon e-gift card.






