Musing on Cablevision's RS-DVR

By Peter Smith  2 comments

Cablevision is going to debut their Remote-Storage DVR this summer. This is a DVR with no hard drive. Instead, the content you record will be saved on Cablevision's remote servers. PC World has all the details.

It's an interesting idea. The customer has no hardware to fail, one less device quietly inflating the electric bill 24 hours a day (or at least, inflating it less with no hard drive to spin) and content would be available at every cable drop in the house. The big downside is that apparently you won't be able to fast forward past commercials. How does that work, I wonder? Can you fast forward through other parts of the show? If so, how does the thing 'know' you're in a commercial and disable the Fast Forward feature? That's a little creepy. I wonder if what is really meant is that there's no instant skip forward, a la the Tivo's hidden 30-second forward jump?

I'm also trying to imagine the server end of things. When I tell the RS-DVR to 'record' Lost what is really happening in the server farm? Is a decision made to actually record Lost, or is everything already recorded and now I'm just flagged to be able to access it? It seems ridiculous that Cablevision's servers would record a separate copy of a show for every subscriber; we could all watch the same copy. So since every show has a least some fans, virtually every show will end up recorded on their servers. And following that, if every show is already recorded, why bother to make me schedule a recording of it? And why limit how many simultaneous shows I can access? And once I can watch anything any time, why do I need the standard cable service at all?

I'm speculating, but it seems like this service almost has to have a bunch of totally arbitrary limitations put in place in order to protect 'regular' cable. And if that is the case, how long until some service comes along that doesn't include those limitations? Could this be the beginning of the end of cable TV? Instead of a show being broadcast at 8 pm on Wednesday nights, it'd uploaded to the remote servers at 8 pm on Wednesday nights. What do you think? Am I missing something in my reasoning?

Follow Peter on Google+

Peter Smith writes about personal technology for ITworld.

2 comments

    Anonymous 1 year ago
    The best part of having your own hard disk rather than streaming shows from their server is that the shows you recorded, you own them and you can keep their copy with you anytime you want. But on the other side, it will be one hardware less (perhaps the most important hardware for me) hence there will be less complains. And I do agree with your reasoning that they won't be making copies of each show for every subscriber (that would make them buy thousands terabytes of disk) so what's the logic behind doing all this? Minnetonka real estate
    Anonymous 2 years ago
    Maybe it will be one less device quietly adding to my electrical bill, but I have every confidence in the Dolan's that they will find a way to more than make up for money I may save otherrwise. They seem to have this unique talent to take money that should be in my pocket, put it into their pocket, and then use it on making the Knicks worse, defending themselves in sexual harrasment suits, and continuing to bring bad service to the citizens of New York.Even if they came up with a cable devise that broadcasts 3D holograms to my living room, it wouldn't be worth it. Cablevision has shown time and time again that they will consistently find a way to screw over the consumer

      Add a comment

      Post a comment using one of these accounts
      Or join now
      At least 6 characters

      Note: Comment will appear soon after you have activated your account.
      Obscene/spam comments will be removed and accounts suspended.
      The information you submit is subject to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

      ITworld LIVE

      Ask a question

      Ask a Question