Communicating during conflicts
NOT EVERYBODY gets along. But how you approach conflicts can make all the
difference. Not all means of communication are created equal, cautions Bill Lampton,
president of consulting firm Championship Communication, in Gainsville, Ga., and author
of The Complete Communicator: Change Your Communication, Change Your Life (Hillsboro
Press, 1999). Some methods quell discord; others can aggravate it.
According to Lampton, e-mail should never be used as a tool for addressing
conflict. "The written word is cold and also can be so open to misunderstanding,"
Lampton says. Moreover, e-mail is often used to perpetuate conflict rather than to
resolve it. "Someone sends a heated [message] and the other person says, 'I'll show
them,' and they fire back," Lampton says. Finally, e-mail is not confidential, leaving
an electronic trail of exchanges your company is entitled to read.
On its own, Lampton says, no form of written communication -- be it interoffice
memo, fax, or letter -- can defuse a tense situation in the workplace. "Written
communication may help in defining the problem and eventually describing new agreements
but it is unreliable in the heat of strife," Lampton says. Written documents can be
very useful to structure debate or, after the fact, to list agreed-upon compromises.
For immediacy, using the telephone is better than sending an e-mail message, and it
has the benefit of conveying voice tone and inflection. The disadvantage is that you
don't see the other person's nonverbal signals -- gestures, expressions, and body
language -- so you may miss key emotional responses. Lampton suggests using the phone
for conflicts that involve information.
4. Face-to-face conversation
The most intimate form of communication is face-to-face conversation, which is
perhaps why so many people shy away from it when confronting uncomfortable situations.
A sit-down talk is the best option when dealing with personality conflicts or a job
evaluation, and it is the best forum for resolution, Lampton says. Trying to resolve
conflict via any other medium delivers a subliminal message that says, "I don't want to
confront you with this," according to Lampton. But seeing someone's reaction to what
you have to say can have a curative effect, even if the situation can't be remedied
immediately. Of course, careful listening is integral to the success of an in-person