ICANN looks toward end of US agreement

The Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
is starting to look at how the organization might function after its current
memorandum of understanding with the U.S. Department of Commerce expires in
September 2009.

ICANN, the nonprofit group that manages the Internet domain name system, has
suggested it should become independent of Commerce Department oversight when
the current Joint Project Agreement (JPA) with the agency expires. The agency's
memorandum of understanding with ICANN has been in place since 1998, but in
recent years, representatives of some other countries have questioned why the
U.S. government should have primary oversight of the organization.

ICANN has made significant improvements in accountability, transparency and
other issues since the Commerce Department renewed the agreement in September
2006, said Paul Levins, ICANN's executive officer and vice president of corporate
affairs. ICANN's goal after the Commerce Department agreement ends, he said,
is to expand a global governance model that allows input from a broad range
of Internet communities.

"What we're trying to do is ensure that the accountablities that the organization
has now, the responsibilities to all the stakeholders, are locked in place forever,"
Levins said Friday. "We want to try to lock in the existing model over
the long term."

Some people have suggested the JPA should remain in place to provide accountability.
"The fact that ICANN is making progress toward meeting its responsibilities
does not imply that the JPA is no longer needed," Thomas Lenard, president
and senior fellow at conservative think tank iGrowthGlobal, wrote in comments
about the agreement. "Indeed, it may demonstrate the value of the JPA.
The JPA and the continuing tie to the Department of Commerce may account for
ICANN's good performance."

Questions about ICANN's future have come up during a midterm review of the
Commerce Department agreement. The public was invited
to comment on the agreement and the Department of Commerce's National Telecommunications
and Information Administration hosted a public hearing on the agreement in late
February.

As a nonprofit, ICANN operates with "almost no oversight," Lenard
added in his comments. "ICANN is a unique organization," he wrote.
"It is a nonprofit corporation under California law, but unlike literally
any other nonprofit, ICANN makes decisions of major economic and social consequence
throughout the world."

The Center for Democracy and Technology and TechNet, a trade group representing
tech senior executives, both advocated for a continued agreement with the Commerce
Department.

But the expiration of the U.S. agreement would still leave ICANN with accountability,
Levins said. ICANN still has a contract with the U.S. to operate the Internet
Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA), and its board members are elected by several
groups. The organization must follow California law governing nonprofits, Levins
said, and in a "next
steps" document, it has proposed a procedure for removing the board
if enough of the nominating groups agree on removal.

Some other people commenting on ICANN's performance have suggested the organization
hasn't made enough progress on its goals under the Commerce Department agreement.
The organization hasn't done enough work on internationalized domain names "to
empower local non-English speaking communities," wrote Khaled Fattal, chairman
and CEO of Live Multilingual Translator, a company providing online English-to-Arabic
translations. ICANN's inactivity on internationalized domain names has "seriously
damaged potential good faith, trust, and belief in ICANN's competence in the
eyes of the very people ICANN is seeking to appeal to today," Fattal wrote.

But many of the comments on ICANN during the midterm review were positive.
"It is our opinion that ICANN is living up to its mandate and that the
endeavor of transitioning ICANN into a private sector entity is taking shape,"
wrote Anthony Mugambi, chairman of the Kenya Network Information Centre. "Conclusion
of the JPA would, however, provide the next logical step toward full transition
some time in the future."

ICANN's Levins said the organization is paying attention to criticisms. ICANN
"could and should always do more," he said. "Is there even a
point where you can say ... security and stability are done?"

But the organization also wants to more toward being more autonomous, as has
been the stated goal of the agreement with the Commerce Department, he said.
ICANN will begin engaging stakeholders about how a transition should work in
the coming months, he said.

"The [Internet] addressing system is so fundamental," he said. "We
need to make sure that can't change and there isn't a point at which any one
entity is able to change that, or can reconfigure that somewhere down the track."