Gartner: Don't assume SaaS is cheaper

By Leo King, Computerworld UK |  SaaS, application services 6 comments

IT managers should not assume that software-as-a-service is cheaper than on-premise software, Gartner has said.

The analyst house said there had been a "great deal of hype" around SaaS, and that businesses had misconceptions about its cost.

SaaS is cheaper during its first two years of use, Gartner said, but five year total cost of ownership would be lower for on-premise software. Part of this was from an accounting perspective, as the capital assets for on-premise software would depreciate.

Calling for businesses to have a "reality check" on SaaS, Gartner VP Robert DeSisto said: "The concern is that some companies are actually deploying SaaS solutions, based on these false assumptions."

In its report 'Fact-Checking: The Five Most-Common SaaS Assumptions', Gartner also warned that SaaS was not necessarily faster to implement. While vendors quote 30 days as the normal implementation time, some software still takes up to seven months, it said.

Businesses are equally wrong to assume they will be billed according to usage, Gartner said. In "the vast majority of cases", it explained, firms were pushed to sign pre-determined contracts with a fixed fee.

But companies also underestimated SaaS, the report stated. Many felt they could not integrate the software with on-premise applications or data sources, but data could be initially loaded to the SaaS application then updated regularly, or updated in real time using web services. Additionally, Gartner said, firms needed to remember that SaaS applications can be customised, and are no longer only for basic functions.

6 comments

    rsweeting123
    rsweeting123 9 weeks ago
    I believe small businesses would benefit from a fair usage policy.
    Anonymous 2 years ago
    I agree with Richard Stone comment above.In my experience, for on-premise implementations the devil is actually in details. Especially, in large enterprises adding a new enterprise application to the existing complex IT support context may mean steep learning curves, long lead times to procure, install and configure the necessary infrastructure components and hefty opportunity cost, exacerbating the risks and delays in launching the intended value to the organization. So, to compare apples to apples, the TCO for on-premise implementations also need to account for quantification of these risks, say the opportunity cost if the solution is delayed by six months due to delays in procuring the necessary infrastructure components multiplied by probability of the risk.While the business process standardization challenges are the same for both of these modes, I see that most of the on-premise infrastructure risks are jettisoned with SaaS, contributing to the shorter implementation times. So, when time is essence, say immediately reaching out to a underserved consumer market, in my opinion SaaS is the clear choice.More insight on this topic is at http://www.enterprise20link.com/Regards,Gopi Padakandlahttp://www.enterprise20link.com/
    Anonymous 2 years ago
    I wonder if they're comparing apples with apples? SaaS provides enterprise-class applications without the enterprise-class hassle that goes with them. Take E-Mail for instance: A 5-person SMB is subject to exactly the same FRCP (e-discovery) rules as a 5000-person enterprise, but the additional cost of archiving & compliance using in-house hw & sw is prohibitive for them. SaaS gives them the functionality they need without the spin-off costs that they don't need.
    Anonymous 2 years ago
    The other thing to keep in mind is that after five years you'll typically have to upgrade the on-premise app in a major way which will again swing the economics in favor of the SaaS app.So, there'll be breakeven points every 3-4 years or so until you have to upgrade again.
    Anonymous 2 years ago in reply to Anonymous
    It again depends on subscription cost, whether the upgrade cost makes a big enough impact. A high number of users, in the thousands for instance can still result in SaaS having a higher TCO over 5 years than on-premise (even assuming a reasonable discount).
    Anonymous 2 years ago
    I have been doing a lot of TCO work around on-premise and SaaS. The main proportion of a 5 year TCO for SaaS comes from the subscription fees (around 80% usually). Therefore, number of users and negotiated discount, have a major influence on the overall TCO. Low number of users, or a big discount means SaaS can often be cheaper beyond 2 years. I agree with the implementation time comment above. As the customisation ability of the SaaS products improves, development time increases, the product can be tailored to a greater degree. Also, in a project involving a lot of data migration and interfaces, SaaS has no implementation time advantages there, same impact as always.

      Add a comment

      Post a comment using one of these accounts
      Or join now
      At least 6 characters

      Note: Comment will appear soon after you have activated your account.
      Obscene/spam comments will be removed and accounts suspended.
      The information you submit is subject to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

      ITworld LIVE

      SaaSWhite Papers & Webcasts

      White Paper

      The Journey to the Private Cloud

      Both business and IT need the agility enabled by the private cloud. Now you can apply technologies and processes pioneered by public cloud services to your own data center.

      Webcast On Demand

      Navigating the Public Cloud

      InfoWorld contributing editor and consultant David Linthicum offers expert advice about choosing services to outsource to the public cloud providers, cloud data security and identity, integrating public cloud services, and how to avoid provider lock-in.

      Sponsor: Intel

      White Paper

      Moving Service Management to SaaS

      Today, organizations can enjoy similarly substantial benefi ts by migrating their IT service management functions to a software-as-a-service model. This paper shows how Nimsoft Service Desk enables organizations to make the most of this opportunity.

      See more White Papers | Webcasts

      Answers - Powered by ITworld

      Ask a question

      Ask a Question